FEOS wrote:
Irrelevant
But a good example of macro failure though, the guy who planned and funded 9/11 still not caught?
"Alive and well"? You really need to read more.
They are gaining ground in Pakistan, and will retake Afghanistan as soon as the occupying forces leave - see also the point on 'unwinnable wars'.
What does that have to do with the military situation on the ground in Afghanistan? Oh, that's right...nothing.
Its an example of a big fat fuck up which will take years to recover, compared with one minor ambush.
FEOS wrote:
I forgot the OP was descriptive of the entire war...except it is.
Did you mean this bit?
Fight by fight, the infantryman’s war in Afghanistan is often waged on the Taliban’s terms. Insurgents ambush convoys and patrols from high ridges or long ranges and slip away as the Americans, weighed down by equipment, return fire and call for air and artillery support.
Or maybe this?
It was one of hundreds of firefights that have occurred in the Korangal Valley, an isolated region where local insurgents and the Americans have been locked in a bitter stalemate for more than three years.
Waged on the Taliban's terms, stalemate, is that what you meant?
Last week a patrol from the First Infantry Division reversed the routine.
Sounds like one engagement, a few days ago, like you said, need a few hundred more to mean something.
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2009-04-24 06:23:43)