Miss California: I lost because of homos

2009-04-22 02:15:16

#51

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6455|what

Choclot wrote:
Ps- wtf is with all the homophobes on this forums? Sure you can express yourself but quotes such as "they should sit at the back of the bus" and wishing them to die is pretty fucked up.

There life style is pretty fucked up and god hates fags.

There I said it.

2009-04-22 02:23:37

#52

Flecco: iPod is broken.; +1,048|6967|NT, like Mick Dundee

AussieReaper wrote:
Choclot wrote:
Ps- wtf is with all the homophobes on this forums? Sure you can express yourself but quotes such as "they should sit at the back of the bus" and wishing them to die is pretty fucked up.
There life style is pretty fucked up and god hates fags.

There I said it.

God hates bigots too.

wait wut

Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.

2009-04-22 02:37:42

#53

Bradt3hleader: Care [ ] - Don't care [x]; +121|6238

{B-T}<babacanosh> wrote:
I totally agree for what she said
and why the hell is perez alive, why is he a judge

i remember a time when homosexuality was silent and kept in dark corners of society
good ol days

Yeah

fuck perrez, I mean come on, this guy is such a cock sucker.

2009-04-22 03:32:22

#54

FEOS: Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate; +1,182|6713|'Murka

Bradt3hleader wrote:
fuck perrez, I mean come on, this guy is such a cock sucker.

^

“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular

2009-04-22 08:35:43

#55

rdx-fx: ...; +955|6893

Spearhead wrote:
rdx-fx wrote:
So, that judge is all for freedom of speech, and freedom of expression, just as long as your views are exactly the same as his Politically Correct party line.

Asshole.

Doubleplusungood.
I assume you're talking to me?

Nope.

Not in the slightest.

Was talking about the hypocrisy of that judge, Perez Hilton(?).

2009-04-22 09:30:29

#56

Pug: UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate; +652|6844|Texas - Bigger than France

I glad they are asked hard hitting questions on politics, the economy and the environment because we all look to beauty queens to make policy.

Shouldn't it just be about imagining them naked? If the mouth is moving, I'm certainly not hearing anything they are saying anyway.

Congrats on getting any media coverage this year Miss USA pageant.

2009-04-22 10:48:43

#57

lowing: Banned; +1,662|6953|USA

Bradt3hleader wrote:
I'm Christian, God bless her and America. Hope that guy got ass raped by his BF after.

Oh how very, typical, Christian of you. Hypocrisy abound.

2009-04-22 13:47:44

#58

Bell: Frosties > Cornflakes; +362|6851|UK

BN wrote:
I cant believe some people are so anti gay.

To me: someones sexuality is not even on my radar, just like their gender, just like their hair colour, etc

Who are we judge other peoples lifestyles?

Did you read his blog about her?

2009-04-22 17:00:27

#59

BN: smells like wee wee; +159|7070

Bell wrote:
BN wrote:
I cant believe some people are so anti gay.

To me: someones sexuality is not even on my radar, just like their gender, just like their hair colour, etc

Who are we judge other peoples lifestyles?
Did you read his blog about her?

No, I don't even know who this guy is.

2009-04-22 19:59:05

#60

Stingray24: Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy; +1,060|6747|The Land of Scott Walker

Bell wrote:
BN wrote:
I cant believe some people are so anti gay.

To me: someones sexuality is not even on my radar, just like their gender, just like their hair colour, etc

Who are we judge other peoples lifestyles?
Did you read his blog about her?

I heard he called her some choice words. From what I read of her statement, seems she was very balanced by expressing her personal views, but allowing for the views of others. But that's not enough, we must celebrate da gayness don't ya know.

2009-04-22 20:02:45

#61

ATG: Banned; +5,233|6831|Global Command

Funny how she's the one with balls and Perez Hilton is a little bitch.

2009-04-22 20:04:39

#62

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5887

Thinking about it it wouldn't have surprised me if Hilton was going to pull some shit out of it to get into the papers by calling her a liar or saying she was being PC if she said she supported it.

2009-04-22 20:18:18

#63

Hurricane2k9: Pendulous Sweaty Balls; +1,538|6003|College Park, MD

Choclot wrote:
Ps- wtf is with all the homophobes on this forums? Sure you can express yourself but quotes such as "they should sit at the back of the bus" and wishing them to die is pretty fucked up.

It's satire. You want my real opinion?

The government should remove all legal recognition of 'marriage.' Those joint tax filing benefits? Those hospital visit things? They'd be benefits from what are called by the legal name of 'civil unions.' Heterosexual and homosexual couples would be able to get these 'civil unions.' If people want a marriage ceremony, then they can go to a church for that.

That way, gays could get the same rights that heterosexual couples currently have. And the extreme right couldn't bitch about it "destroying the sacred institution of marriage" because it wouldn't be marriage. It would be civil union.

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/36793/marylandsig.jpg

2009-04-22 20:19:36

#64

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6839|Long Island, New York

Hurricane2k9 wrote:
Choclot wrote:
Ps- wtf is with all the homophobes on this forums? Sure you can express yourself but quotes such as "they should sit at the back of the bus" and wishing them to die is pretty fucked up.
It's satire. You want my real opinion?

The government should remove all legal recognition of 'marriage.' Those joint tax filing benefits? Those hospital visit things? They'd be benefits from what are called by the legal name of 'civil unions.' Heterosexual and homosexual couples would be able to get these 'civil unions.' If people want a marriage ceremony, then they can go to a church for that.

That way, gays could get the same rights that heterosexual couples currently have. And the extreme right couldn't bitch about it "destroying the sacred institution of marriage" because it wouldn't be marriage. It would be civil union.

Now this, I like. And completely agree with.

Would solve a lot of problems.

Too bad it'll never happen.

2009-04-22 20:20:31

#65

Hurricane2k9: Pendulous Sweaty Balls; +1,538|6003|College Park, MD

Poseidon wrote:
Too bad it'll never happen.

And I have no idea why. It would shut everybody up.

2009-04-22 20:26:11

#66

ATG: Banned; +5,233|6831|Global Command

Because people pay a marriage license, i.e. tax.

Also because government parasites don't like effort.

2009-04-22 20:28:55

#67

Hurricane2k9: Pendulous Sweaty Balls; +1,538|6003|College Park, MD

Turn it into a civil union license then.

2009-04-22 23:06:08

#68

Kmar: Truth is my Bitch; +5,695|6903|132 and Bush

She's got the same position as our president.

Xbone Stormsurgezz

2009-04-23 06:07:05

#69

TeamZephyr: Maintaining My Rage Since 1975; +124|6831|Hillside, Melbourne, Australia

Meh, nothing but a case of sour grapes. Lets all move on and talk about something worthwhile.

2009-04-23 17:46:03

#70

Spark: liquid fluoride thorium reactor; +874|6976|Canberra, AUS

Holyfuckingshit there are a few homophobes around here.

The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
^{~ Richard Feynman}

2009-04-23 18:38:50

#71

Noobpatty: ʎʇʇɐdqoou; +194|6656|West NY

AussieReaper wrote:
god
hate

wut

2009-04-23 18:47:46

#72

BN: smells like wee wee; +159|7070

Reminds me of the Dave Chappelle sketch. - "black bush"

"you are always trying to distract motherF$^rs with things like the war and scurry all the real issues. Gay people are getting married folks!"

2009-04-24 09:43:37

#73

Bradt3hleader: Care [ ] - Don't care [x]; +121|6238

So again why is Paris Hilton a judge? Oups I misspelled "Perrez Hilton".

Coincidence? I think not!

2009-04-24 09:53:10

#74

loubot: O' HAL naw!; +470|6880|Columbus, OH

Ghandi767 wrote:
CC-Marley wrote:
Perez Hilton is what's wrong with this world.
Marley hit the nail on the head.

exactly!

She answered the question honestly and as decent as she could. Honesty & Decency should hold a lot more merit than being politically correct.
After listening to Perez Hilton's after-thoughts, his arguments are purely subjective.
Oh well, it is a trivial contest to begin with.

2009-04-24 10:39:01

#75

CC-Marley: Member; +407|7130

Trump is loving all this!

BF2S Forums Miss California: I lost because of homos

Choclot wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

Choclot wrote:

{B-T}<babacanosh> wrote:

Bradt3hleader wrote:

Spearhead wrote:

rdx-fx wrote:

Bradt3hleader wrote:

BN wrote:

Bell wrote:

BN wrote:

Bell wrote:

BN wrote:

Choclot wrote:

Hurricane2k9 wrote:

Choclot wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

Ghandi767 wrote:

CC-Marley wrote:

Board footer