That is by far one of my favorite videos of the past few months.Kmarion wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-lZqEMHMlk
Fucking great.
Fucking great.
I would be pretty happy if both the jews and arabs kept fighting over what ever they are fighting and all died.
aerodynamic wrote:
I would be pretty happy if both the jews and arabs kept fighting over what ever they are fighting and all died.
If it was someone else who was saying that maybe it wouldn't be so bad, the fact that it's bloody Iranian Ahmedinijad that's saying it just takes the cake
thats the issue, no one else has the balls to say this, apart from Hugo Chavez but he is trying to mend U.S relations so he won't say it at this present time.Mekstizzle wrote:
If it was someone else who was saying that maybe it wouldn't be so bad, the fact that it's bloody Iranian Ahmedinijad that's saying it just takes the cake
hilarious isn't it?Mekstizzle wrote:
If it was someone else who was saying that maybe it wouldn't be so bad, the fact that it's bloody Iranian Ahmedinijad that's saying it just takes the cake
and his supporters keep on saying it is just freedom of speech.....yet the muslim lobby wanted the UN to make it a crime to criticise islam....and as we know they find almost anything that isn't completely pro-islam offensive
it seems they want the freedom to say whatever they like...but no one else is allowed the same privileges....hypocrites
dude, this statement is a bit lame to say the least. Firstly Jews is not equal to Arabs, Jews = Muslims, Arabs = Israelis, period. Second, you saying that like Christians live on another planet. Its all connected dude.aerodynamic wrote:
I would be pretty happy if both the jews and arabs kept fighting over what ever they are fighting and all died.
Edit: Thirdly, i get what your saying and i like you so i'm trying really hard not to be condescending.
Last edited by mafia996630 (2009-04-20 14:59:58)
whats this got to do with muslims and islam???benefit wrote:
hilarious isn't it?Mekstizzle wrote:
If it was someone else who was saying that maybe it wouldn't be so bad, the fact that it's bloody Iranian Ahmedinijad that's saying it just takes the cake
and his supporters keep on saying it is just freedom of speech.....yet the muslim lobby wanted the UN to make it a crime to criticise islam....and as we know they find almost anything that isn't completely pro-islam offensive
it seems they want the freedom to say whatever they like...but no one else is allowed the same privileges....hypocrites
read the post numpty
do you know the background to the boycott?rammunition wrote:
whats this got to do with muslims and islam???benefit wrote:
hilarious isn't it?Mekstizzle wrote:
If it was someone else who was saying that maybe it wouldn't be so bad, the fact that it's bloody Iranian Ahmedinijad that's saying it just takes the cake
and his supporters keep on saying it is just freedom of speech.....yet the muslim lobby wanted the UN to make it a crime to criticise islam....and as we know they find almost anything that isn't completely pro-islam offensive
it seems they want the freedom to say whatever they like...but no one else is allowed the same privileges....hypocrites
read the post numpty
do some research.....it was always about the muslims wanting to criticise israel and also to try to implement a law making it illegal to ctiticise islam.......
it is a current event .......odd you missed those facts.....lol
Agreed. It would have been far more effective if Dinnerjacket did not attend and this was instead distributed amongst the attendees:Mekstizzle wrote:
If it was someone else who was saying that maybe it wouldn't be so bad, the fact that it's bloody Iranian Ahmedinijad that's saying it just takes the cake
... among other literature.
careful your bias is in danger of showing....lolCameronPoe wrote:
Agreed. It would have been far more effective if Dinnerjacket did not attend and this was instead distributed amongst the attendees:Mekstizzle wrote:
If it was someone else who was saying that maybe it wouldn't be so bad, the fact that it's bloody Iranian Ahmedinijad that's saying it just takes the cake
http://counterpunch.org/walt.JPG ... among other literature.
Says Mr. 'Lack of Bias'... I'm biased against racism, bigotry, the subjugation of others, territorial expansionism through military endeavour (a la Hitler), etc.benefit wrote:
careful your bias is in danger of showing....lol
Last edited by CameronPoe (2009-04-20 15:37:22)
Silly Cam, its not bad if Israel does it.CameronPoe wrote:
Says Mr. 'Lack of Bias'... I'm biased against racism, bigotry, the subjugation of others, territorial expansionism through military endeavour (a la Hitler), etc.benefit wrote:
careful your bias is in danger of showing....lol
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
Great, just what the forum needs... another 14 year old who hates Muslims and thinks they know the inner workings of the United Nations.benefit wrote:
yes that's itBraddock wrote:
You sound like a conspiracy theorist. Are you claiming the United Nations put together a forum on racism with the tacit intention of having an anti-Israeli love-in?
And I don't see how criticizing a nation can be seen as racism - or are you one of these people who can't separate Israel from Jewishness? Israel wants to be part of the developed, civilised world... well I'm afraid they're going to have to put up with free speech and people questioning their apartheid policies in that case.
it is just a conspiracy theory and the iranian nut job and his hench men would not dream of using the UN as a forum to push their anti-israel hatred
and of course they wouldn't be looking for special treatment for islam ...making it a crime to criticise this faith .......
and free speech isn't the issue ......it is just an opportunity for the iranian bloke to make himself look important in the eyes of the muslim nations by slagging off israel, the US and Europe......a great start to a forum against racism..lol
The United Nations is a representative body for the whole world, it is not in the business of pandering to one mindset or special interest group. We've discussed the cumbersome, inefficient nature of the UN in countless threads on here in the past and the notion that it has the ability to slickly put together an anti-semitic conference and push a pro-Islamic agenda under the noses of the world's media is quite frankly laughable.
To give your argument any sort of weight could you at least point out when exactly Ahmedinijad called for International laws to be passed banning criticism of Islam, and once you've done that you can point out any evidence showing that the UN has actually implemented these supposed laws.
What Ahmedinijad seeks to get out of his grandstanding is neither here nor there to be honest, but as long as he is talking about racial inequality and not actually advocating racial intolerance himself he is entitled to his free speech. I'm no fan of the guy but I have only ever heard him criticizing the Israeli regime... not Jews.
"Bias"... some people have no sense of irony.benefit wrote:
careful your bias is in danger of showing....lolCameronPoe wrote:
Agreed. It would have been far more effective if Dinnerjacket did not attend and this was instead distributed amongst the attendees:Mekstizzle wrote:
If it was someone else who was saying that maybe it wouldn't be so bad, the fact that it's bloody Iranian Ahmedinijad that's saying it just takes the cake
http://counterpunch.org/walt.JPG ... among other literature.
Only he didn't.JahManRed wrote:
Powell used the UN to show falsified slides of imaginary WMD factories which resulted in a war which killed thousands. This is a discussion. Chill.
Incorrect analysis =/= "falsified" anything.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Okay... Ahmedinijad was just incorrectly analysing the Israeli regime then!FEOS wrote:
Only he didn't.JahManRed wrote:
Powell used the UN to show falsified slides of imaginary WMD factories which resulted in a war which killed thousands. This is a discussion. Chill.
Incorrect analysis =/= "falsified" anything.
I'm just joking, but seriously this was a debate on racism and people wouldn't even hear this guy out. I disagree with this de facto muzzling of free speech that is becoming all too common these days, all it does is give ammunition to the Islamic extremists who will turn around now and say the Western world considers it okay to bash Islam but not Zionism. Think of the message that this sends out to the Middle East.
The likes of Benefit are on here talking about "bloody Mooslims" who demand that no one say anything bad against their faith and yet can't see the irony in simultaneously supporting the idea that no one should be allowed to say anything bad against Zionism. The hypocrisy is laughable.
How's about this for an idea Israel: send a delegate of your own to raise issue with the comments made by Ahmedinijad if you perceive them to be racist... it's called free speech.
Last edited by Braddock (2009-04-21 03:41:01)
It seems you want everyone to have the right to criticize islam but get your knickers in a twist when someone wants to do the same with Israel.benefit wrote:
hilarious isn't it?Mekstizzle wrote:
If it was someone else who was saying that maybe it wouldn't be so bad, the fact that it's bloody Iranian Ahmedinijad that's saying it just takes the cake
and his supporters keep on saying it is just freedom of speech.....yet the muslim lobby wanted the UN to make it a crime to criticise islam....and as we know they find almost anything that isn't completely pro-islam offensive
it seems they want the freedom to say whatever they like...but no one else is allowed the same privileges....hypocrites
You're just as hypocritical as the Muslim extremists you claim to be so adamantly against.
UN is fail. It always was bound to be fail after Woodrow Wilson's also failed interbellum initiative.
Oh, it is undoubtedly a failure... but accusations of it being some sort of agent for one exclusively anti-semitic point of view are absolute nonsense.Lai wrote:
UN is fail. It always was bound to be fail after Woodrow Wilson's also failed interbellum initiative.
Last edited by Braddock (2009-04-21 07:07:16)