BF2S Forums Racism Or Censorship?

Man With No Name wrote:

no you havent.  its funny because Im certain you know you are wrong, you just want to keep going.  Apartheid is a very specific term lowing.  Very specific.  You are not using that word correctly.  Ive just looked up LEGAL definition of apartheid, and you still cant use that word in your argument.  quit being dense.

Wiki wrote:

The speech was also disrupted by two protesters, attired in colourful wigs, with one hurling a UFO at the President amidst cries of "racist, racist" as he was taken from the room. The BBC described the exit as a "public relations disaster" for the United Nations.

Man With No Name wrote:

lowing wrote:

Man With No Name wrote:

so lowing still doesnt know what apartheid means.  instead arguing the case for his misuse of the the term in the context in which he intended, he talks about his dog sleeping on the bed. 

stay on topic.  make your argument.  dont change the story.

you always do this lowing.  as soon as you find that youve back yourself in a corner, you change the subject by going off on a tangent or talking about how youre being insulted.  its a very common theme in your posts.

I d onot back down form arguments, and I do not change the subject. I do not go off on "tangents" and I only point out personal attacks, when I have been personally attacked.

Also, I only ask to be shown where I have said something when I have been quoted as saying it.

lol.  we must not be talking about the same lowing.  maybe you should read your post history. 

this very reply coming from you only proves my point.


please, talk about your dog some more.

lowing wrote:

Man With No Name wrote:

no you havent.  its funny because Im certain you know you are wrong, you just want to keep going.  Apartheid is a very specific term lowing.  Very specific.  You are not using that word correctly.  Ive just looked up LEGAL definition of apartheid, and you still cant use that word in your argument.  quit being dense.

a·part·heid    (ə-pärt'hīt', -hāt')   
n.   
An official policy of racial segregation formerly practiced in the Republic of South Africa, INVOLVING POLITCAL, LEGAL, and ECONOMIC DISCRIMINATION AGAINST non-whites. A policy or practice of separating or segregating groups.
The condition of being separated from others; segregation

I quoted "apartheid polices" I did not bring the term into this discussion. THe Jews in Iran are not treated as equals, they fall under Sharia Law which does not favor non-Muslims.

lowing wrote:

Man With No Name wrote:

no you havent.  its funny because Im certain you know you are wrong, you just want to keep going.  Apartheid is a very specific term lowing.  Very specific.  You are not using that word correctly.  Ive just looked up LEGAL definition of apartheid, and you still cant use that word in your argument.  quit being dense.

a·part·heid    (ə-pärt'hīt', -hāt')   
n.   
An official policy of racial segregation formerly practiced in the Republic of South Africa, INVOLVING POLITCAL, LEGAL, and ECONOMIC DISCRIMINATION AGAINST non-whites. A policy or practice of separating or segregating groups.
The condition of being separated from others; segregation

I quoted "apartheid polices" I did not bring the term into this discussion. THe Jews in Iran are not treated as equals, they fall under Sharia Law which does not favor non-Muslims.

Mekstizzle wrote:

The Jews and Arabs/Persians/Muslims are equally racist, surely. The fact that there is such animosity between the two, it isn't only because of one party. To blame it all on the Muslims or the Jews would be wrong, it's racism on both sides. Not necessarily Racism as Judaism and Islam are religions not races, but ....bigotry or whatever the word is.

To say that Israel is simply a victim is just plain wrong, and to say that the Arabs are just victims of Israeli aggression is also wrong. It's that kind of narrow minded shit that I hate, and I have to admit, it's always the pro-Israeli people who have the narrowest of minds and refuse to believe in faults in the state of Israel.

If there is any "apartheid policies", it is against Israel by the Arab and Islamic nations, and it would be so, if it were not for Israel's ability to defend itself and fend off any such action.

Bollocks, this is exactly what I'm talking about. Refusal to acknowledge any blame on the part of Israel and lay it all on the Muslims, sure enough,  you make a point about the Arabs and Muslims in their treatment towards Israel, but to just ignore the fact that Israel can also be seen as equally racist is just ridiculous. What the fuck is the difference between you and someone from Hamas who just likes to blame it all on one party. Fucking people that can't see both sides of the story when it comes to Israel/Arab conflict pisses me off. And I hate to say it, but on this forum it's the die hard pro-Israeli people like lowing and FEOS that consistently refuse to believe that Israel is ever at fault, moreso than their own country the USA.

And I never understood why right wingers tend to be pro-Israeli and left-wingers pro-Arab. But it always falls into that pattern everywhere you go.

lowing wrote:

I am not pro Israel

Bertster7 wrote:

lowing wrote:

Man With No Name wrote:

no you havent.  its funny because Im certain you know you are wrong, you just want to keep going.  Apartheid is a very specific term lowing.  Very specific.  You are not using that word correctly.  Ive just looked up LEGAL definition of apartheid, and you still cant use that word in your argument.  quit being dense.

a·part·heid    (ə-pärt'hīt', -hāt')   
n.   
An official policy of racial segregation formerly practiced in the Republic of South Africa, INVOLVING POLITCAL, LEGAL, and ECONOMIC DISCRIMINATION AGAINST non-whites. A policy or practice of separating or segregating groups.
The condition of being separated from others; segregation

I quoted "apartheid polices" I did not bring the term into this discussion. THe Jews in Iran are not treated as equals, they fall under Sharia Law which does not favor non-Muslims.

They fall under the protection of the Iranian constitution which grants them equal rights.

Under law, Jews in Iran have the same rights as Muslims.

The Jews in Iran are not treated as equals, they fall under Sharia Law which does not favor non-Muslims.

Man With No Name wrote:

white seperatists usually make that assumption