173 million people and 100 nuclear weapons

2009-04-13 15:55:22

#1

ATG: Banned; +5,233|6831|Global Command

That'd be Pakistan.

2/3rds of country is out of the control of the government.

"We have to face the fact that if Pakistan collapses it will dwarf anything we have seen so far in whatever we're calling the war on terror now,"

http://www.smh.com.au/world/warning-tha … -a40u.html

2009-04-13 16:12:20

#2

Jasp: Bongabilla; +171|6964|The Outer Circle

In Afghanistan, it's easy to understand, difficult to execute. But in Pakistan, it is very difficult to understand and it's extremely difficult for us to generate any leverage, because Pakistan does not want our help.

Dont get involved then? It might sound stupid but getting involved might just make it more f**ked up!

I saw an interview with some top General of Pakistan army, he sounded like he knew what was goin on and wasnt bothered by it! reckons he can control the 'bad people' as he said. Ill try and find it somewhere.

https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/11882/holteendersig2.jpg

https://forums.bf2s.com/img/avatars/11508.gif

2009-04-14 01:54:04

#3

Flecco: iPod is broken.; +1,048|6967|NT, like Mick Dundee

The leader of the Pakistani Armed forces doesn't follow the government's orders if he doesn't feel like it TPM.

That's how fucked up the country is at the moment. The government is losing its grip.

Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.

2009-04-14 02:37:17

#4

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6455|what

This isn't new. Pakistan has nuclear weapons pointed at India, who have their own pointed back at Pakistan.

Next to terrorists, the other very real threat is a military coup.

2009-04-14 03:01:22

#5

FEOS: Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate; +1,182|6713|'Murka

AussieReaper wrote:
This isn't new. Pakistan has nuclear weapons pointed at India, who have their own pointed back at Pakistan.

Next to terrorists, the other very real threat is a military coup.

They had one of those a while back. Pakistan was much more sedate under Musharraf...for a while.

“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular

2009-04-14 03:37:00

#6

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6455|what

The thing about coups is that they usually are overthrown by another.

2009-04-14 04:53:59

#7

Commie Killer: Member; +192|6689

AussieReaper wrote:
This isn't new. Pakistan has nuclear weapons pointed at India, who have their own pointed back at Pakistan.

Next to terrorists, the other very real threat is a military coup.

Wonder whos side people would take if India decided the world would be safer if the Paki's didnt have nukes.

2009-04-14 12:34:26

#8

rammunition: Fully Loaded; +143|6163

FEOS wrote:
AussieReaper wrote:
This isn't new. Pakistan has nuclear weapons pointed at India, who have their own pointed back at Pakistan.

Next to terrorists, the other very real threat is a military coup.
They had one of those a while back. Pakistan was much more sedate under Musharraf...for a while.

lol, and who forced him out with this "so called democracy"???

2009-04-14 13:13:38

#9

M.O.A.B: 'Light 'em up!'; +1,220|6525|Escea

rammunition wrote:
FEOS wrote:
AussieReaper wrote:
This isn't new. Pakistan has nuclear weapons pointed at India, who have their own pointed back at Pakistan.

Next to terrorists, the other very real threat is a military coup.
They had one of those a while back. Pakistan was much more sedate under Musharraf...for a while.
lol, and who forced him out with this "so called democracy"???

I reckon it was Ali Baba

2009-04-14 13:22:20

#10

Turquoise: O Canada; +1,596|6707|North Carolina

rammunition wrote:
FEOS wrote:
AussieReaper wrote:
This isn't new. Pakistan has nuclear weapons pointed at India, who have their own pointed back at Pakistan.

Next to terrorists, the other very real threat is a military coup.
They had one of those a while back. Pakistan was much more sedate under Musharraf...for a while.
lol, and who forced him out with this "so called democracy"???

We actually supported Musharraf. We were giving his government billions on a monthly basis.

We're not on the best of terms with his replacement.

2009-04-14 13:23:36

#11

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5888

Turquoise wrote:
rammunition wrote:
FEOS wrote:
They had one of those a while back. Pakistan was much more sedate under Musharraf...for a while.
lol, and who forced him out with this "so called democracy"???
We actually supported Musharraf. We were giving his government billions on a monthly basis.

We're not on the best of terms with his replacement.

What the hell? They aren't happy about us supporting their former dictator?

2009-04-14 13:28:12

#12

Turquoise: O Canada; +1,596|6707|North Carolina

Macbeth wrote:
Turquoise wrote:
rammunition wrote:

lol, and who forced him out with this "so called democracy"???
We actually supported Musharraf. We were giving his government billions on a monthly basis.

We're not on the best of terms with his replacement.
What the hell? They aren't happy about us supporting their former dictator?

Eh... Musharraf wasn't really a dictator. He was too weak to be that.

Honestly, what Pakistan needs right now is either a dictator or just needs to be split into about 5 pieces.

2009-04-14 13:33:01

#13

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5888

Turquoise wrote:
Macbeth wrote:
Turquoise wrote:

We actually supported Musharraf. We were giving his government billions on a monthly basis.

We're not on the best of terms with his replacement.
What the hell? They aren't happy about us supporting their former dictator?
Eh... Musharraf wasn't really a dictator. He was too weak to be that.

Honestly, what Pakistan needs right now is either a dictator or just needs to be split into about 5 pieces.

what?
Military coup Check
Appointing himself leader Check
Suspending the Constitution Check
Not a dictator in the classical sense but certainly falls in there.

2009-04-14 13:33:48

#14

Turquoise: O Canada; +1,596|6707|North Carolina

Macbeth wrote:
Turquoise wrote:
Macbeth wrote:

What the hell? They aren't happy about us supporting their former dictator?
Eh... Musharraf wasn't really a dictator. He was too weak to be that.

Honestly, what Pakistan needs right now is either a dictator or just needs to be split into about 5 pieces.
what?
Military coup Check
Appointing himself leader Check
Suspending the Constitution Check
Not a dictator in the classical sense but certainly falls in there.

Well, maybe weak dictator is a better term.

Saddam, for example, was much more effective.

2009-04-14 13:35:38

#15

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5888

Turquoise wrote:
Macbeth wrote:
Turquoise wrote:

Eh... Musharraf wasn't really a dictator. He was too weak to be that.

Honestly, what Pakistan needs right now is either a dictator or just needs to be split into about 5 pieces.
what?
Military coup Check
Appointing himself leader Check
Suspending the Constitution Check
Not a dictator in the classical sense but certainly falls in there.
Well, maybe weak dictator is a better term.

Saddam, for example, was much more effective.

Jesus that was a quick reply.

Uh yeah he was. He probably would be your classical dictator.

2009-04-14 17:09:49

#16

FEOS: Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate; +1,182|6713|'Murka

rammunition wrote:
FEOS wrote:
AussieReaper wrote:
This isn't new. Pakistan has nuclear weapons pointed at India, who have their own pointed back at Pakistan.

Next to terrorists, the other very real threat is a military coup.
They had one of those a while back. Pakistan was much more sedate under Musharraf...for a while.
lol, and who forced him out with this "so called democracy"???

The people of Pakistan.

Or were you looking for the incorrect answer?

“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular

2009-04-15 18:40:14

#17

benefit: Member; +21|6018

pakistan's leaders will continue to hold its hands out for aid which it claims will be used for fighting terrorism

most will not be

pakistan is not ready for democracy....it seems many muslim countries only function with a dictator.....too little education for the masses and too much emphasis on a religion that is taught to the people by so called clerics with little real education themselves but a religious fervour

the taliban is what many want

in britain we have some of these same nut jobs asking for sharia law ..........and our pathetic government is entertaining the idea to keep muslims on side......they have learned nothing about appeasement and pandering

BF2S Forums 173 million people and 100 nuclear weapons

AussieReaper wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

FEOS wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

rammunition wrote:

FEOS wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

rammunition wrote:

FEOS wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

rammunition wrote:

FEOS wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

rammunition wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

rammunition wrote:

FEOS wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

Board footer