Flecco
iPod is broken.
+1,048|6967|NT, like Mick Dundee

SonderKommando wrote:

Americans being armed is supposed to prevent us from tyranny.
Your government has access to tanks, aircraft, gunships and strategic nuclear weapons.


You guys having a few pop-guns isn't going to do diddly-squat if the military sides with the government.
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6748|The Land of Scott Walker
So no one in the military will choose their families over some politician?  Pffffff.
Flecco
iPod is broken.
+1,048|6967|NT, like Mick Dundee

Stingray24 wrote:

So no one in the military will choose their families over some politician?  Pffffff.
If their families are guaranteed protection and the good life if the government is defended from any possible revolution? Probably at least some.
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
SonderKommando
Eat, Lift, Grow, Repeat....
+564|6962|The darkside of Denver

Flecco wrote:

SonderKommando wrote:

Americans being armed is supposed to prevent us from tyranny.
Your government has access to tanks, aircraft, gunships and strategic nuclear weapons.


You guys having a few pop-guns isn't going to do diddly-squat if the military sides with the government.
Look at the quagmire that has happened in Iraq with small force of insurgents.  There are over 80 million gun owners in the United States.  Even though the resistance we pose may seem at face value to be small, in conflict of attrition we would most likely overcome the seeming insurmountable odds against us.

Last edited by SonderKommando (2009-03-30 18:50:05)

Flecco
iPod is broken.
+1,048|6967|NT, like Mick Dundee

SonderKommando wrote:

Flecco wrote:

SonderKommando wrote:

Americans being armed is supposed to prevent us from tyranny.
Your government has access to tanks, aircraft, gunships and strategic nuclear weapons.


You guys having a few pop-guns isn't going to do diddly-squat if the military sides with the government.
Look at the quagmire that has happened in Iraq with small force of insurgents.  There are over 80 million gun owners in the United States.
You're forgetting that any tyrannical take-over in the USA would probably start with popular support or some sort of catastrophic event to make it seem legitimate.

It wouldn't be as simple as an invading force of soldiers showing up for you guys to take pot-shots at while throwing back a few beers. There'd be some sort of prepratory phase before takeover involving a few debilitating, highly contagious but easily curable diseases being released into the public via water-supplies/crop dusting etc via a false flag operation. and the activation of the ol' FEMA 'disaster' camps for the easy removal of possible 'accidental guerrillas' from the population. With the loyal segments of the military vaccinated against the diseases and a purge in the style of the Night of the Long Knives it wouldn't be beyond the realms of possibility. Especially if it was presented in a convenient package for the sheeple to accept as the only way to continue living the good life.

Taking out the hard core of people who seriously considered and prepared for an event like that wouldn't take long with black bag style rendition teams from the CIA being deployed internally to capture them during the aforementioned preparatory phase. After the take-over was in action/complete the deployment of ARSOC/USSOCOM or JSOC forces to eliminate any pockets of trouble would probably be all that's needed.


Good despots only ever let the public know they are fucked after they have already seized power. The best despots have a majority that is either supportive or apathetic toward them. /conspiracytheorist

Last edited by Flecco (2009-03-30 19:09:04)

Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard