is "rocket" your dingle and "uranus" some guy's anus?usmarine wrote:
i know. and i have a rocket that can reach uranusLord_Palm-Of_Doom wrote:
That is bad.....
Your defence systems should do the job at intercepting well
It is true. And you've missed the point. It was true long before Bush and Iraq.BN wrote:
Um Iraq is just an example.FEOS wrote:
Um...they were developing nukes long before Bush came into office, BN. It has nothing to do with Iraq.BN wrote:
having a nuke and wanting to use it are very different things.
What are the US's nukes? Deterrents.
IF THIS IS TRUE, then its merely a form of saying "i wont be invaded like iraq"
IF THIS IS TRUE, then its merely a form of saying "I don't want to be on the receiving end of USA's 'spreading of democracy'."
Silly monkey. You can't start a post in this forum about US foreign policy without it turning into a Bush and/or Israel-bashing thread.Lord_Palm-Of_Doom wrote:
This post wasn't intended to attack Bush.
Don't tell me what my argument is about thank you.FEOS wrote:
It is true. And you've missed the point. It was true long before Bush and Iraq.BN wrote:
Um Iraq is just an example.FEOS wrote:
Um...they were developing nukes long before Bush came into office, BN. It has nothing to do with Iraq.
IF THIS IS TRUE, then its merely a form of saying "I don't want to be on the receiving end of USA's 'spreading of democracy'."
It...has...nothing...to...do...with...Bush...or...Iraq.
Your argument is based on Bush's actions and rhetoric. nK's actions are not.
Last edited by BN (2009-02-26 16:49:52)
Then perhaps you could be consistent in your argument.BN wrote:
Don't tell me what my argument is about thank you.FEOS wrote:
It is true. And you've missed the point. It was true long before Bush and Iraq.BN wrote:
Um Iraq is just an example.
IF THIS IS TRUE, then its merely a form of saying "I don't want to be on the receiving end of USA's 'spreading of democracy'."
It...has...nothing...to...do...with...Bush...or...Iraq.
Your argument is based on Bush's actions and rhetoric. nK's actions are not.
I'm pretty sure you didn't. The closest you came was "Um Iraq is just an example". As an example, then it would be part of your argument.BN wrote:
Its not about Bush or Iraq and I am pretty sure i stated that.
QED.BN wrote:
IF THIS IS TRUE, then its merely a form of saying "i wont be invaded like iraq"
ORLY? And just what "spreading of democracy" that would be viewed as a threat by nK has occurred? The only invasions ("invaded" being the word you used, btw) that have ostensibly been about "spreading democracy" occurred under Bush. Those would be Afghanistan and Iraq, with Iraq being the most controversial.BN wrote:
Its about American foreign policy for the last 50 years.
Here's something from a hard-to-find source:BN wrote:
Edit: I havent seen any source for the claims that NK has capability of hitting US. Please provide.
And another:It has been estimated to be able to reach 4600 miles, enough to hit the western states of the U.S.
And another:The Taep'o-dong-2 (TD-2) is said to be a two or three stage missile with a range estimated at approximately 3,650-3,750 km with a 700-1,000 kg payload. Other sources credit the TD-2/NKSL-X-2** with a range in excess of 4,000-4,300 km.
There's this website. It's called Google. Give it a whirl.The Taepodong-2 long-range missile is estimated to have a range of between 5,000 and 6,000 km, putting Alaska, Hawaii and parts of the west coast of the US within range.
Yea well guess what? http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ar … 4Oct5.htmlFlecco wrote:
The French.Kmarion wrote:
I can imagine some responding with a strongly worded letter of disapproval.usmarine wrote:
that's most peoples policy...for those who can that is
That's because they knew it was bullshit.Flecco wrote:
Hey that's interesting. Pity they didn't come along for the rather costly ride like the rest of us.
you know, that's not actually what the article said, ATG.ATG wrote:
That's because they knew it was bullshit.Flecco wrote:
Hey that's interesting. Pity they didn't come along for the rather costly ride like the rest of us.
The Iraq war was unneeded. It was founded on lies and bush should be tried and dealt with like what he is.
Don't make me say it.
Or they could just blow up any major CBD within reach...Warhammer wrote:
If a country had a nuke. They would be using it to nuke in mid-air and use the EMP to get rid of the United States for the long turn. If it aimed at us.
Central Business DistrictFEOS wrote:
And what is a CBD in this context?
I'm sure it's not Christian Book Distributor
or Common Bile Duct
or Convention on Biological Diversity
just going with the first few google hits here...
You can get that too of what I said previously. The EMP will effect everything in America if shot at right.FatherTed wrote:
Central Business DistrictFEOS wrote:
And what is a CBD in this context?
I'm sure it's not Christian Book Distributor
or Common Bile Duct
or Convention on Biological Diversity
just going with the first few google hits here...
sorry, geog terminology
?Warhammer wrote:
You can get that too of what I said previously. The EMP will effect everything in America if shot at right.FatherTed wrote:
Central Business DistrictFEOS wrote:
And what is a CBD in this context?
I'm sure it's not Christian Book Distributor
or Common Bile Duct
or Convention on Biological Diversity
just going with the first few google hits here...
sorry, geog terminology
It would have to hit power station grids and substations, at more than one location. No EMP in existence or well into the future could do that.Warhammer wrote:
You can get that too of what I said previously. The EMP will effect everything in America if shot at right.
an EMP only has a certain effective distance...Warhammer wrote:
You can get that too of what I said previously. The EMP will effect everything in America if shot at right.FatherTed wrote:
Central Business DistrictFEOS wrote:
And what is a CBD in this context?
I'm sure it's not Christian Book Distributor
or Common Bile Duct
or Convention on Biological Diversity
just going with the first few google hits here...
sorry, geog terminology
lol, right.Warhammer wrote:
Read the quotes from the EMP Commission this was awhile back.
http://www.newsmax.com/timmerman/iran_n … 17217.html
lol at what newsmax or Dr. William Graham?FatherTed wrote:
lol, right.Warhammer wrote:
Read the quotes from the EMP Commission this was awhile back.
http://www.newsmax.com/timmerman/iran_n … 17217.html