BF2S Forums Would you kill your friend to save humanity?

Ok here goes:
1. humanity is gone so incest is no longer taboo.
2. humanity is gone and so are the best and the brightest scientist and doctors to combat this plague.
3. three retards are left.
Final option kill every one, including self to spare humanity of future retards and mutated midgets.

This is way to hypothetical to be a good debate ... let's get back to killing animals for fun ...

you and girl have kids.  friend has sex and makes babies with girl children.  you have sex with your friend's girl children.  grandparent incest ftw amirite?

If he fuck his sister, it will make a generation of stupid baby, if i bang her, perfect kids...Choice not hard tbh

Roger Lesboules wrote:

If he fuck his sister, it will make a generation of stupid baby, if i bang her, perfect kids...Choice not hard tbh

Then what Roger?


You gonna fuck your kids? Get her to fuck them too?


This situation always leads back to incest.

Macbeth wrote:

rdx-fx wrote:

Here's a mod thread idea:

Would you Ban MacBeth to prevent another Would you <X> to <Y> morality thread

Just an amusing thought

Right, posting internet articles and debating them is much better then having a discussion on ethics.

How about one thread with all of your various morality questions in the original post?

Like;

1) Fuck a Duck?
2) For a Buck?
3) In a Truck?

As far as morality goes, i fear that a good percentage of the 11-21 year old age group here has no moral compass beyond "for t3h lulz"

rdx-fx wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

rdx-fx wrote:

Here's a mod thread idea:

Would you Ban MacBeth to prevent another Would you <X> to <Y> morality thread

Just an amusing thought

Right, posting internet articles and debating them is much better then having a discussion on ethics.

How about one thread with all of your various morality questions in the original post?

Like;

1) Fuck a Duck?
2) For a Buck?
3) In a Truck?

As far as morality goes, i fear that a good percentage of the 11-21 year old age group here has no moral compass beyond "for t3h lulz"

Add up all the various morality threads I made then try to make that into one long OP people would understand. Beside they are deal with different moral issues.

It's nice to see if the 11-21 actually do have any moral compass beyond that rather then assuming they don't. Judging from the responses to the threads, I would say that they do have some sort of moral base.

Flecco wrote:

Already stated why I think your threads go off the rails.

Yeah, I read it. It'll get worse Friday. But rather then giving the low would you kick a puppy for $10. Why not go for the extreme and go all the way into it? Would decapitate an animal for money? It's nice seeing what boundaries people have and how far down they would go in order to get what they want or to do what they think is best. Extremes are good. Beside that the thread I got the idea from on another forum is right now debating would they kill a pedo with a drill saw, so this isn't that bad.

Macbeth wrote:

Flecco wrote:

Already stated why I think your threads go off the rails.

Yeah, I read it. It'll get worse Friday. But rather then giving the low would you kick a puppy for $10. Why not go for the extreme and go all the way into it? Would decapitate an animal for money? It's nice seeing what boundaries people have and how far down they would go in order to get what they want or to do what they think is best. Extremes are good. Beside that the thread I got the idea from on another forum is right now debating would they kill a pedo with a drill saw, so this isn't that bad.

Yeah fair enough. That's the thing though.

Kicking a puppy for $10 = simple, straight forward and no other implications.

I wouldn't kick a puppy for $10, who would? It serves no logical purpose and is just an act of random cruelty for money. If you would, then you're a sick/desperate/cruel person.


I would kill a swan depending on a whole number of circumstances, as with any other animal depending on what happens to the carcass.