Dude, you'll never get laid. Just kill yourself now. lolMacbeth wrote:
My last thread for awhile, promise.
So lets say a plague of some kind just wiped across Earth in a manner of days or something else completely wiped everyone but three people off the face of the Earth.
You, your friend, his beautiful sister.
Now here is the question. You are the last three people on the planet and you know it's your duty to repopulate the Earth. Now your friend has some incest fantasies about his sister. Needless to say he would love to procreate with his sister. There is no way he would ever allow you to have sex with her. The only way for you to ever create spawn with his sister would be to kill your friend. His sister knows her duty and will do whatever she needs to continue the species. You could always make his death look like an accident anyway.
Now why would you want to kill your friend and plow his sister? Genetics; the offspring have an a high chance of coming out with genetic defects. If the children don't come out with defects and grow up to be rather attractive he would still not let you touch them. So he has to die. Keep in mind your friend has a bunch of bad traits and some bad genes that should be eradicated.
I know eventually incest would have to take place in order to continue from there but if you produce enough spawn once they reproduce with each other the amount of good spawn will outweigh bad spawn and you could eradicate the bad ones tills you have a diverse enough gene pool.
So would you kill your friend to continue the species by nailing his sister or would you let humanity die out?
Spoiler (highlight to read):
I swear to god FM, don't turn this into a debate of should humanity deserve to continue.
- Index »
- Community »
- Debate and Serious Talk »
- Would you kill your friend to save humanity?
Negative. I put it her for the reason that some people in EE, never leave EE. If you want to see it spread put it in EE.Pochsy wrote:
Agreed. This should be moved.ATG wrote:
you got ee for garbage. wtf.
This shit will spread like a cancer and it needs to die now.
thank you for the baseless assumption. But there is actually a point to this thread. That you will see if you keep to the subject at hand stated in the OP.Pug wrote:
Dude, you'll never get laid. Just kill yourself now. lolMacbeth wrote:
My last thread for awhile, promise.
So lets say a plague of some kind just wiped across Earth in a manner of days or something else completely wiped everyone but three people off the face of the Earth.
You, your friend, his beautiful sister.
Now here is the question. You are the last three people on the planet and you know it's your duty to repopulate the Earth. Now your friend has some incest fantasies about his sister. Needless to say he would love to procreate with his sister. There is no way he would ever allow you to have sex with her. The only way for you to ever create spawn with his sister would be to kill your friend. His sister knows her duty and will do whatever she needs to continue the species. You could always make his death look like an accident anyway.
Now why would you want to kill your friend and plow his sister? Genetics; the offspring have an a high chance of coming out with genetic defects. If the children don't come out with defects and grow up to be rather attractive he would still not let you touch them. So he has to die. Keep in mind your friend has a bunch of bad traits and some bad genes that should be eradicated.
I know eventually incest would have to take place in order to continue from there but if you produce enough spawn once they reproduce with each other the amount of good spawn will outweigh bad spawn and you could eradicate the bad ones tills you have a diverse enough gene pool.
So would you kill your friend to continue the species by nailing his sister or would you let humanity die out?
Spoiler (highlight to read):
I swear to god FM, don't turn this into a debate of should humanity deserve to continue.
Last edited by Macbeth (2009-02-24 18:26:48)
Fixed the title to something a little less offensive. Macbeth, you need to work on your delivery.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Ok, sorry. I thought it was funny that's all.Macbeth wrote:
thank you for the baseless assumption. But there is actually a point to this thread. That you will see if you keep to the subject at hand stated in the OP.
So before I answer your question, am I gay in this post apocalyptic hypothetical?
No, bro's over ho's.
What? Someone had to say it.
What? Someone had to say it.
What the fuck is with you and killing people?
You are beginning to remind me of Trombly from Generation Kill.
You are beginning to remind me of Trombly from Generation Kill.
I tried three times to read the op, honest.
Each time I was reminded of a seven year old, hiding with a flashlight under his bed writing twisted short stories, picking his noes and wiping the bogers on the wall.
I just couldn't get through it.
To coment on the gist of it; if myself and my sister were the last two people alive I would perform self surgury to reverse my vasectomy and fuck my sister, thereby starting humanity over again. I would proceed until I had a boy and a girl, name them Adam and Eve, declare myself God and have all my descendants pay me tithing.
Each time I was reminded of a seven year old, hiding with a flashlight under his bed writing twisted short stories, picking his noes and wiping the bogers on the wall.
I just couldn't get through it.
To coment on the gist of it; if myself and my sister were the last two people alive I would perform self surgury to reverse my vasectomy and fuck my sister, thereby starting humanity over again. I would proceed until I had a boy and a girl, name them Adam and Eve, declare myself God and have all my descendants pay me tithing.
It's not your sister, it's your friend's sister.ATG wrote:
I tried three times to read the op, honest.
Each time I was reminded of a seven year old, hiding with a flashlight under his bed writing twisted short stories, picking his noes and wiping the bogers on the wall.
I just couldn't get through it.
To coment on the gist of it; if myself and my sister were the last two people alive I would perform self surgury to reverse my vasectomy and fuck my sister, thereby starting humanity over again. I would proceed until I had a boy and a girl, name them Adam and Eve, declare myself God and have all my descendants pay me tithing.
Goddamnit I aint reading the goddamned op, it sux ballz.
The question is, would you kill your friend and have sex with your sister in order to stop some dickhead nailing your sister?
Or, would you let your friend have sex with your sister, then have sex with your niece in order to add a bit of diversity to the gene pool?
Or, would you let your friend have sex with your sister, then have sex with your niece in order to add a bit of diversity to the gene pool?
Reread the OP. You misunderstood it I assume. It's not you and your sister. It's you, your friend, and his sister.ATG wrote:
I tried three times to read the op, honest.
Each time I was reminded of a seven year old, hiding with a flashlight under his bed writing twisted short stories, picking his noes and wiping the bogers on the wall.
I just couldn't get through it.
To coment on the gist of it; if myself and my sister were the last two people alive I would perform self surgury to reverse my vasectomy and fuck my sister, thereby starting humanity over again. I would proceed until I had a boy and a girl, name them Adam and Eve, declare myself God and have all my descendants pay me tithing.
btw I'm actually an 18 year old typing things on his his laptop while watching Obama give a speech on TV.
And jesus chrsit ATG, that could be used for some really good quote mining.
Last edited by Macbeth (2009-02-24 18:43:05)
C'mon these threads are more interesting than "rah rah IRAQ rah rah OBAMA rah rah ECONOMY rah rah IMMIGRATION rah rah IRAN rah rah ISLAM"ATG wrote:
Goddamnit I aint reading the goddamned op, it sux ballz.
Is my friend a doctor who can give me a sex change so I don't have to kill anyone?
Fine, just rename the section Deest
DART (Debate and Redundant Talk) would be betterATG wrote:
Fine, just rename the section Deest
Those aren't the only things in the world worth discussing in a serious matter. In fact threads like mine on morality get to the actually base of every situation. This is a morality thread. If we could go to the base of every subject deep down we would get more done then actually disccusing the semantics.ATG wrote:
Fine, just rename the section Deest
Thank you. Scorpion
Last edited by Macbeth (2009-02-24 18:51:47)
And herein lies the problem with D&ST - people don't actually want to debate anything to any depth, they just want to soapbox on whatever their latest pet-peeve is.Macbeth wrote:
Those aren't the only things in the world worth discussing in a serious matter. In fact threads like mine on morality get to the actually base of every situation. This is a morality thread. If we could go to the base of every subject deep down we would get more done then actually disccusing the schematics.ATG wrote:
Fine, just rename the section Deest
Oh, and I think you meant 'semantics', not 'schematics'.
Last edited by Scorpion0x17 (2009-02-24 18:49:45)
I support this thread.
However, I think I need a new friend since incest is wrong and his sister is a lesbian.
However, I think I need a new friend since incest is wrong and his sister is a lesbian.
OBAMA'S SPEECHES HAVE SUBLIMINAL MESSAGES CAUSING PEOPLE TO FANTASIZE INSCEST AND THE MURDER OF FRIENDS!Macbeth wrote:
btw I'm actually an 18 year old typing things on his his laptop while watching Obama give a speech on TV.
And jesus chrsit ATG, that could be used for some really good quote mining.
McBeth, if you want a real thread on morality, stop going so whacked out abstract for your hypothetical situations.
Last edited by Flecco (2009-02-24 19:02:08)
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
True. However if you add a Swan and a frog.AussieReaper wrote:
I think I threw up little.Macbeth wrote:
Now your friend has some incest fantasies about his sister. Needless to say he would love to procreate with his sister. There is no way he would ever allow you to have sex with her. The only way for you to ever create spawn with his sister would be to kill your friend. His sister knows her duty and will do whatever she needs to continue the species.
And 3 people are not enough to continue the species for what your proposing.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
If you're down to just a single man and a single woman...regardless of their relation...humanity is fucked after the first generation.
Why not just smack your friend in the head to knock him out long enough for you to break his sister's pelvis?
Why not just smack your friend in the head to knock him out long enough for you to break his sister's pelvis?
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Because after he wakes up he's going to try to kill you.FEOS wrote:
If you're down to just a single man and a single woman...regardless of their relation...humanity is fucked after the first generation.
Why not just smack your friend in the head to knock him out long enough for you to break his sister's pelvis?
Yeah, but you already nailed his sister. And while he's knocked out, you can tie him up and bravely run away.Macbeth wrote:
Because after he wakes up he's going to try to kill you.FEOS wrote:
If you're down to just a single man and a single woman...regardless of their relation...humanity is fucked after the first generation.
Why not just smack your friend in the head to knock him out long enough for you to break his sister's pelvis?
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
He will search for you and then kill both you. There is no way around it. He must die.FEOS wrote:
Yeah, but you already nailed his sister. And while he's knocked out, you can tie him up and bravely run away.Macbeth wrote:
Because after he wakes up he's going to try to kill you.FEOS wrote:
If you're down to just a single man and a single woman...regardless of their relation...humanity is fucked after the first generation.
Why not just smack your friend in the head to knock him out long enough for you to break his sister's pelvis?
Yes, nailing my friends hot sister sounds fun.
And any way genetic defects from incest is not common. So
And any way genetic defects from incest is not common. So
is completely miss leading.the offspring have an a high chance of coming out with genetic defects.
- Index »
- Community »
- Debate and Serious Talk »
- Would you kill your friend to save humanity?