Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6645|Canberra, AUS

AussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:

really, and what is "Dubya" supposed to addressing?

It was not a chain mail, and you will never read a thing in the main stream media saying anything bad about Obama if they can help it. If they can help it, i will be ignore, or just a brief article on page 3.

Look at the passes given on his cabinet full of tax cheats, and lobbyists.
It was a chain mail, that's how the story came to light. Lowing I don't think you've actually read the article you posted here.

Spark wrote:

Wow.

I'm having trouble thinking of more trivial topics over which to have a 140-post debate.
AU chat thread. 23552 posts and counting. lol
Yes but at least they don't try to paint it as anything but mindless drivel.

Spoiler (highlight to read):
dw i still love you all <3
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6622|USA

FatherTed wrote:

FatherTed wrote:

Do you know the only reason this got to 6 pages?
K, you've got a lot to reply to, so i'll answer my own question

It's because you're a fucking headcase when it come to petty shite like this. Get back to proper debating, you're quite good at that.
It would seem dressing an inexperienced Chicago politician as a God, then actually electing this socialist president based on Obamamania, who then gets his books placed under "religion", as part of the on going mass hysteria over this idiot as something to talk about.

Like I said, there must be something to this Obamamania, since it reaches farther than a bookstore.

This article was meant to be nothing more than another example as to the lunacy people express over their Messiah.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6645|Canberra, AUS

lowing wrote:

DonFck wrote:

lowing wrote:


Almost as trivial as trashing a president for 8 years for something as simple as his Texas accent. Where was your disgust then.
No, I trashed that president for about 5-6 years, after his first fuckups, then again some more after he got elected with the minority vote. Not his accent. He could talk like a fucking leprechaun, that wouldn't change my opinion. Besides, you know nothing about my opinion on the matter (which basically is that he was more or less a puppet, and the decisions were made by his staff).

You, on the other hand are crying wolf because some bookstore probably had a shitty temp doing the job of organizing books on minimum wage.
Get over yourself for a second. I wasn't talking about you. In general on this forum Bush has been made fun of because of his accent, ( something trivial) I asked YOU, where YOUR disgust was about its trivial nature? I did not say YOU did it.

Ahh I see, another excuse, had to be a dumbass employee now. It just could never be done unpurpose with the intentions of a message.
...


...









...



Honestly, who really gives a fuck what his intentions were? Oh no, books about Obama were placed on a strange shelf. Dear God, the four horseman are coming!
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6124|what

lowing wrote:

It would seem dressing an inexperienced Chicago politician as a God, then actually electing this socialist president based on Obamamania, who then gets his books placed under "religion", as part of the on going mass hysteria over this idiot as something to talk about.
Inexperienced?

He has more Presidential experience than McCain will ever have, unless of course McCain runs and wins in the next election and then stays in Office for a 2nd term...
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
DrunkFace
Germans did 911
+427|6652|Disaster Free Zone

lowing wrote:

DrunkFace wrote:

lowing wrote:


No thanks, I would rather EARN a living.
Did you EARN the roads you drive on?
Don't give me that bullshit. YOu know damn well the difference between paying taxes for infrastructure and paying for some elses way through life. Who, by the way, also drives on the roads I helped pay for.
No Lowing. They should charge you for every mile you use, just like you pay for electricity, water, gas and telecommunications by the amount you use.
DonFck
Hibernator
+3,227|6602|Finland

Those ungrateful bastards, liberal unemployed poor people are using MY road? That I paid for with MY money? Kill them I say! But let them pay for the bullets!
I need around tree fiddy.
fadedsteve
GOP Sympathizer
+266|6461|Menlo Park, CA

AussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:

It would seem dressing an inexperienced Chicago politician as a God, then actually electing this socialist president based on Obamamania, who then gets his books placed under "religion", as part of the on going mass hysteria over this idiot as something to talk about.
Inexperienced?

He has more Presidential experience than McCain will ever have, unless of course McCain runs and wins in the next election and then stays in Office for a 2nd term...
He IS inexperienced. . . .

He (Obama) has NEVER held an "executive" position in his life! I Dont like McCain for a variety of reasons, but he is way more "experienced" when it comes to Washington and its politics.  Obama is a "celebrity" pure and simple that happens to run the country now. . . . .

What is happening now i.e. the "stimulus plan" is liberalism "run a' muck", THIS COUNTRY IS SO FUCKED ITS UNBELIEVEABLE! The WORST and I mean WORST piece of legislation to EVER come out of Washington. . . . . I am so angry, I could spit! The powers at be need TO ALL be fired! Revolution is upon us people! REVOLT REVOLT REVOLT!!!
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6124|what

lowing wrote:

really, and what is "Dubya" supposed to addressing?
Yeah, well you can be accused of the same.

Obama's Speech

lowing wrote:

he still is an idiot without a teleprompter
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6124|what

fadedsteve wrote:

He IS inexperienced. . . .

He (Obama) has NEVER held an "executive" position in his life! I Dont like McCain for a variety of reasons, but he is way more "experienced" when it comes to Washington and its politics.  Obama is a "celebrity" pure and simple that happens to run the country now. . . . .

What is happening now i.e. the "stimulus plan" is liberalism "run a' muck", THIS COUNTRY IS SO FUCKED ITS UNBELIEVEABLE! The WORST and I mean WORST piece of legislation to EVER come out of Washington. . . . . I am so angry, I could spit! The powers at be need TO ALL be fired! Revolution is upon us people! REVOLT REVOLT REVOLT!!!
Never? But he does... now. Today. This instant. President of the United States is a pretty executive power imo. As for the rest of your post, it's not that bad... is it?
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6622|USA

AussieReaper wrote:

I wait with baited breath for the next thread of lowings that includes Obama in the thread title or as the subject matter.
Shouldn't be too much longer, I am sure he will appoint another criminal or lobbyist, or his agenda to strip the responsibility from private citizens ( as well as their money) will spark my attention. In the mean time, the idiots that love this guy is baffling enough to talk about.

Last edited by lowing (2009-02-20 04:42:01)

FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6471|so randum

lowing wrote:

FatherTed wrote:

FatherTed wrote:

Do you know the only reason this got to 6 pages?
K, you've got a lot to reply to, so i'll answer my own question

It's because you're a fucking headcase when it come to petty shite like this. Get back to proper debating, you're quite good at that.
It would seem dressing an inexperienced Chicago politician as a God, then actually electing this socialist president based on Obamamania, who then gets his books placed under "religion", as part of the on going mass hysteria over this idiot as something to talk about.

Like I said, there must be something to this Obamamania, since it reaches farther than a bookstore.

This article was meant to be nothing more than another example as to the lunacy people express over their Messiah.
Instead, you've ended up highlighting the lunacy some people express over Obama. Good job
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6622|USA

DonFck wrote:

Those ungrateful bastards, liberal unemployed poor people are using MY road? That I paid for with MY money? Kill them I say! But let them pay for the bullets!
Why not try putting what I say in the context of the discussion? Surely there is enough to say about me without having to resort to misquotes, and purposely taking things out of context.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6622|USA

AussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:

really, and what is "Dubya" supposed to addressing?
Yeah, well you can be accused of the same.

Obama's Speech

lowing wrote:

he still is an idiot without a teleprompter
Yeah well, I am not the one disgusted and offended and crying foul

Last edited by lowing (2009-02-20 04:49:09)

JahManRed
wank
+646|6599|IRELAND

fadedsteve wrote:

What is happening now i.e. the "stimulus plan" is liberalism "run a' muck", THIS COUNTRY IS SO FUCKED ITS UNBELIEVEABLE! The WORST and I mean WORST piece of legislation to EVER come out of Washington. . . . . I am so angry, I could spit! The powers at be need TO ALL be fired! Revolution is upon us people! REVOLT REVOLT REVOLT!!!
You are totally insane. "The worst legislation to ever come out of Washington"???? Catch a fucking grip. What about all the legislation that brought us to the finical crises? Ohh, wait that was done under the Republicans, so must be all good. That's the legislation that put us where we are. Instead you are criticising a package designed to try and repair the mistakes of the previous administrations. Your such a republican blinkered fan boy its almost unbelievable.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6622|USA

JahManRed wrote:

fadedsteve wrote:

What is happening now i.e. the "stimulus plan" is liberalism "run a' muck", THIS COUNTRY IS SO FUCKED ITS UNBELIEVEABLE! The WORST and I mean WORST piece of legislation to EVER come out of Washington. . . . . I am so angry, I could spit! The powers at be need TO ALL be fired! Revolution is upon us people! REVOLT REVOLT REVOLT!!!
You are totally insane. "The worst legislation to ever come out of Washington"???? Catch a fucking grip. What about all the legislation that brought us to the finical crises? Ohh, wait that was done under the Republicans, so must be all good. That's the legislation that put us where we are. Instead you are criticising a package designed to try and repair the mistakes of the previous administrations. Your such a republican blinkered fan boy its almost unbelievable.
No it was done because the liberal democrats insisted that ( basically entitlement at its best) that everyone shgould be able to buy a home. Little details of actually affording one not with standing.

Last edited by lowing (2009-02-20 06:20:44)

DonFck
Hibernator
+3,227|6602|Finland

lowing wrote:

JahManRed wrote:

fadedsteve wrote:

What is happening now i.e. the "stimulus plan" is liberalism "run a' muck", THIS COUNTRY IS SO FUCKED ITS UNBELIEVEABLE! The WORST and I mean WORST piece of legislation to EVER come out of Washington. . . . . I am so angry, I could spit! The powers at be need TO ALL be fired! Revolution is upon us people! REVOLT REVOLT REVOLT!!!
You are totally insane. "The worst legislation to ever come out of Washington"???? Catch a fucking grip. What about all the legislation that brought us to the finical crises? Ohh, wait that was done under the Republicans, so must be all good. That's the legislation that put us where we are. Instead you are criticising a package designed to try and repair the mistakes of the previous administrations. Your such a republican blinkered fan boy its almost unbelievable.
No it was done because the liberal democrats insisted that ( basically entitlement at its best) that everyone shgould be able to buy a home. Little details of actualkly affording one not with standing.
No lowing, that wasn't the reason. If "the damn socialist hippie liberal douches" would have wanted that, there wouldn't have been any superinflation of real-estate prices.
I need around tree fiddy.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6622|USA

DonFck wrote:

lowing wrote:

JahManRed wrote:

You are totally insane. "The worst legislation to ever come out of Washington"???? Catch a fucking grip. What about all the legislation that brought us to the finical crises? Ohh, wait that was done under the Republicans, so must be all good. That's the legislation that put us where we are. Instead you are criticising a package designed to try and repair the mistakes of the previous administrations. Your such a republican blinkered fan boy its almost unbelievable.
No it was done because the liberal democrats insisted that ( basically entitlement at its best) that everyone shgould be able to buy a home. Little details of actualkly affording one not with standing.
No lowing, that wasn't the reason. If "the damn socialist hippie liberal douches" would have wanted that, there wouldn't have been any superinflation of real-estate prices.
And why not? The market sets the prices and with EVERYONE qualifing for a loan, the inflation would go up.


and yes, that was EXACTLY the reason

Last edited by lowing (2009-02-20 06:19:48)

FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6471|so randum

FatherTed wrote:

lowing wrote:

FatherTed wrote:


K, you've got a lot to reply to, so i'll answer my own question

It's because you're a fucking headcase when it come to petty shite like this. Get back to proper debating, you're quite good at that.
It would seem dressing an inexperienced Chicago politician as a God, then actually electing this socialist president based on Obamamania, who then gets his books placed under "religion", as part of the on going mass hysteria over this idiot as something to talk about.

Like I said, there must be something to this Obamamania, since it reaches farther than a bookstore.

This article was meant to be nothing more than another example as to the lunacy people express over their Messiah.
Instead, you've ended up highlighting the lunacy some people express over Obama. Good job
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6622|USA

FatherTed wrote:

FatherTed wrote:

lowing wrote:


It would seem dressing an inexperienced Chicago politician as a God, then actually electing this socialist president based on Obamamania, who then gets his books placed under "religion", as part of the on going mass hysteria over this idiot as something to talk about.

Like I said, there must be something to this Obamamania, since it reaches farther than a bookstore.

This article was meant to be nothing more than another example as to the lunacy people express over their Messiah.
Instead, you've ended up highlighting the lunacy some people express over Obama. Good job
lunacy? I am not the one who immortized this dipshit. I am one of countless vicitms of his crusade to punish achievment and reward failure through entitlement.
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6124|what

lowing wrote:

crusade

lowing wrote:

Messiah

lowing wrote:

God
Careful, you know how your starting to sound like?
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6622|USA

AussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:

crusade

lowing wrote:

Messiah

lowing wrote:

God
Careful, you know how your starting to sound like?
Yeah, I am sounding like I live in a country full of celebrity worshippers that know more as to what is happening on LOST, than they do with their own govt. THen they elect dumbfuck to handle their affairs for them. He does this by using MY resources that I worked for to bestow entitlement on those that can not be bothered with little minor details of their own lives like actually working toward something other than my bank account.

Last edited by lowing (2009-02-20 06:42:40)

AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6124|what

Problem is that to get an informed opinion that is accurate you really have to do your own digging.

Gone are the days when media investigated the stories they presented. All they now do is is paint a picture for the viewer and then it's on to the next story.
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6622|USA

AussieReaper wrote:

Problem is that to get an informed opinion that is accurate you really have to do your own digging.

Gone are the days when media investigated the stories they presented. All they now do is is paint a picture for the viewer and then it's on to the next story.
Bullshit, the media caters to the public. The public, in their world of entitlement does not give a fuck about where it comes from, as long as they get it, and it does not affect the airing of American Idol.

This is what the public wants, so the media delivers.
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6124|what

lowing wrote:

Bullshit, the media caters to the public. The public, in their world of entitlement does not give a fuck about where it comes from, as long as they get it, and it does not affect the airing of American Idol.

This is what the public wants, so the media delivers.
No no, the media doesn't cater to the public, it caters to it's target market audience. Hence MSNBC and FoxNews can present the same story in a very different light. They are only representing the people who catch the programs, because that's how they make money.

The media hand out the shit because it rates well. If the audience really want an accurate report they have to sift through a number of independent sources on their own. The media can't be represented as a whole catering to the public because it accommodates different stances, sometimes opposing stances. That can't be considered catering the public.
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6622|USA

AussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:

Bullshit, the media caters to the public. The public, in their world of entitlement does not give a fuck about where it comes from, as long as they get it, and it does not affect the airing of American Idol.

This is what the public wants, so the media delivers.
No no, the media doesn't cater to the public, it caters to it's target market audience. Hence MSNBC and FoxNews can present the same story in a very different light. They are only representing the people who catch the programs, because that's how they make money.

The media hand out the shit because it rates well. If the audience really want an accurate report they have to sift through a number of independent sources on their own. The media can't be represented as a whole catering to the public because it accommodates different stances, sometimes opposing stances. That can't be considered catering the public.
and the fact that the vast majority of TV media sources are lberal? Whats that tell ya? The vast majority of TV viewers want to be hand fed.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard