When you posted that there was 2 people taking my side, I doubt it was directed at Surgeons or Jens. Isn't hard to directly call me Ignorant, come on it's not even a warnable offence...AussieReaper wrote:
I simply stated that one would have to be ignorant to believe that F@H was solely directed at Cancer research. Something you easily disputed as not in fact believing yourself and thus not in fact being one of those said ignorant persons.andy12 wrote:
Care to address the questions? Where you trying to indirectly insult me or are you just going to be a smart ass?AussieReaper wrote:
Weird, it was you who first sent me a pm, 24 hour boy. I'd be genuinely shocked if you could tell me how many days were in a month, for any month of the year, or even how many minutes are in an hour. Your concept of time is truly unique among even the Theoretical physicists of the world.
I don't know why you've taken it so personally. I didn't label you as ignorant, because as you said, you think F@H is so much more than just Cancer research and is a real worthwhile cause (well, maybe you were in that much support of it. But there you go).
crap, post deleted
inb4 AWM which will probably lead to a ban as i've been banned liek, 3 times in the last 2 weeks and i'm getting threatened with perms
o shi-
inb4 AWM which will probably lead to a ban as i've been banned liek, 3 times in the last 2 weeks and i'm getting threatened with perms
o shi-
So andy why do you care?
Obviously you weren't AWMed. And obviously you weren't banned.JoshP wrote:
crap, post deleted
inb4 AWM which will probably lead to a ban as i've been banned liek, 3 times in the last 2 weeks and i'm getting threatened with perms
o shi-
But knock it off with the retarded spam or else you'll receive both very quickly.
So Sup why do you care why Andy cares?.Sup wrote:
So andy why do you care?
Seriously though, children, if you can't play nice then don't play at all.
And if you refuse to play nice, then I'll just refuse to let you play.
And if you refuse to play nice, then I'll just refuse to let you play.
Furthermore, why has Andy returned to the realms of Internet to pick this one particular bone?
But seriously, FAH's fanboys do fail epically.
But seriously, FAH's fanboys do fail epically.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
So.....
What was this thread about again?
What was this thread about again?
Why? If Ollie or Jens believe F@H is for Cancer research only they too are ignorant. Ignorant isn't even an insult, it is simply stating that one is unaware of the facts of the matter. But go ahead and take it personally that I am picking on poor little you, who really does think that F@H is a waste and that recycling that pepsi can is so much more important than scientific research.andy12 wrote:
When you posted that there was 2 people taking my side, I doubt it was directed at Surgeons or Jens. Isn't hard to directly call me Ignorant, come on it's not even a warnable offence...
Wait, that wasn't even your argument. Your just pissed because it won a poll.
He wasn't even saying F@H is bad. He was just saying it wasn't the best thread of the year. Then Finray came in here all up in arms and decided to declare war against...Jenspm wrote:
So.....
What was this thread about again?
...yeah.
Whatever. AWMs/Bans are lying in wait.
I don't, I'm just asking. So TMo tell me why do you care if I care what Andy cares? (which as I said I don't care)ThomasMorgan wrote:
So Sup why do you care why Andy cares?.Sup wrote:
So andy why do you care?
You are comparing real scientific research to running a program while you're downloading the new Lady Gaga song? Okay lol...AussieReaper wrote:
Why? If Ollie or Jens believe F@H is for Cancer research only they too are ignorant. Ignorant isn't even an insult, it is simply stating that one is unaware of the facts of the matter. But go ahead and take it personally that I am picking on poor little you, who really does think that F@H is a waste and that recycling that pepsi can is so much more important than scientific research.andy12 wrote:
When you posted that there was 2 people taking my side, I doubt it was directed at Surgeons or Jens. Isn't hard to directly call me Ignorant, come on it's not even a warnable offence...
Wait, that wasn't even your argument. Your just pissed because it won a poll.
Last edited by andy12 (2009-02-15 08:46:42)
Concept good. Thread bad.
/Thread.
/Thread.
Because that post is nearly spam..Sup wrote:
I don't, I'm just asking. So TMo tell me why do you care if I care what Andy cares? (which as I said I don't care)ThomasMorgan wrote:
So Sup why do you care why Andy cares?.Sup wrote:
So andy why do you care?
Why do you care if TMo cares if you care what Andy cares, which you said you didn't care wat..Sup wrote:
I don't, I'm just asking. So TMo tell me why do you care if I care what Andy cares? (which as I said I don't care)ThomasMorgan wrote:
So Sup why do you care why Andy cares?.Sup wrote:
So andy why do you care?
Delete it as I'm not in a mood to argue with you. You are the law, do what you wan't.ThomasMorgan wrote:
Because that post is nearly spam..Sup wrote:
I don't, I'm just asking. So TMo tell me why do you care if I care what Andy cares? (which as I said I don't care)ThomasMorgan wrote:
So Sup why do you care why Andy cares?
What? Please try to make sense. I think there's an attempt at an insult there, yet the syntax is all wrong. Maybe rephrase and try again?andy12 wrote:
You are comparing real scientific research to running a program while you're downloading the new Lady Gaga song? Okay lol...AussieReaper wrote:
Why? If Ollie or Jens believe F@H is for Cancer research only they too are ignorant. Ignorant isn't even an insult, it is simply stating that one is unaware of the facts of the matter. But go ahead and take it personally that I am picking on poor little you, who really does think that F@H is a waste and that recycling that pepsi can is so much more important than scientific research.andy12 wrote:
When you posted that there was 2 people taking my side, I doubt it was directed at Surgeons or Jens. Isn't hard to directly call me Ignorant, come on it's not even a warnable offence...
Wait, that wasn't even your argument. Your just pissed because it won a poll.
ThomasMorgan wrote:
Then Finray came in here all up in arms and decided to declare war...
He insulted f@h, it wasn't unprovoked.andy12 wrote:
not to mention the concept is flawed.
Also
12. Use the Edit button to make spelling corrections, add information, or otherwise change your posts. Duplicate posting only serves to further muddle up threads with more posts than are necessary.
You're reaching.AussieReaper wrote:
What? Please try to make sense. I think there's an attempt at an insult there, yet the syntax is all wrong. Maybe rephrase and try again?andy12 wrote:
You are comparing real scientific research to running a program while you're downloading the new Lady Gaga song? Okay lol...AussieReaper wrote:
Why? If Ollie or Jens believe F@H is for Cancer research only they too are ignorant. Ignorant isn't even an insult, it is simply stating that one is unaware of the facts of the matter. But go ahead and take it personally that I am picking on poor little you, who really does think that F@H is a waste and that recycling that pepsi can is so much more important than scientific research.
Wait, that wasn't even your argument. Your just pissed because it won a poll.
It was pretty easy to understand.
"You're comparing real scientific research as opposed to running a computer program in the background while you talk to your buddies on AIM" or whatnot.
Wait, so me criticising a thread that is posted in by under 5 people(may as well just make a irc chat room) is an insult to you? I'm hardly saying your religion is flawed and going to great lengths to insult you.Finray wrote:
ThomasMorgan wrote:
Then Finray came in here all up in arms and decided to declare war...He insulted f@h, it wasn't unprovoked.andy12 wrote:
not to mention the concept is flawed.
Also
12. Use the Edit button to make spelling corrections, add information, or otherwise change your posts. Duplicate posting only serves to further muddle up threads with more posts than are necessary.
Also edit thing I agree with, some people struggle not to attention seek and post every minute though, see Jensen.
Three different posts about three completely different topics being directed at three different people.Finray wrote:
ThomasMorgan wrote:
Then Finray came in here all up in arms and decided to declare war...He insulted f@h, it wasn't unprovoked.andy12 wrote:
not to mention the concept is flawed.
Also
12. Use the Edit button to make spelling corrections, add information, or otherwise change your posts. Duplicate posting only serves to further muddle up threads with more posts than are necessary.
Though, with 95 moderator actions against you, perhaps you'd be better served if you read over the rules more carefully so you'd more closely understand them.
But, I'm not. lolThomasMorgan wrote:
You're reaching.AussieReaper wrote:
What? Please try to make sense. I think there's an attempt at an insult there, yet the syntax is all wrong. Maybe rephrase and try again?andy12 wrote:
You are comparing real scientific research to running a program while you're downloading the new Lady Gaga song? Okay lol...
It was pretty easy to understand.
"You're comparing real scientific research as opposed to running a computer program in the background while you talk to your buddies on AIM" or whatnot.
If he somehow has to make the assertion that I'm downloading Lady Gage when I'm not, to make himself feel superior when he is losing an argument than fine. But it has zero relevance to anything other than his shrinking ego.
lol, I wonder what would've happened if he insulted you mother.Finray wrote:
ThomasMorgan wrote:
Then Finray came in here all up in arms and decided to declare war...He insulted f@h, it wasn't unprovoked.andy12 wrote:
not to mention the concept is flawed.
Don't you have a better argument?andy12 wrote:
Jensen.
Moreso I took it as him saying you're simply running a program while doing other things...not as though you're sitting in a lab doing actual research.AussieReaper wrote:
But, I'm not. lolThomasMorgan wrote:
You're reaching.AussieReaper wrote:
What? Please try to make sense. I think there's an attempt at an insult there, yet the syntax is all wrong. Maybe rephrase and try again?
It was pretty easy to understand.
"You're comparing real scientific research as opposed to running a computer program in the background while you talk to your buddies on AIM" or whatnot.
If he somehow has to make the assertion that I'm downloading Lady Gage when I'm not, to make himself feel superior when he is losing an argument than fine. But it has zero relevance to anything other than his shrinking ego.
But if you can't get past the reference to you downloading a song, well, that's your own problem. Would it make you feel better if he had said Led Zeppelin?