Sorry, you ain't that luckydeeznutz1245 wrote:
I am hoping for the best, but preparing for the worst. I feel like a passenger on the plane that landed in the Hudson River.TheAussieReaper wrote:
Hopefully you'll have 8 years to reach that number.deeznutz1245 wrote:
We have to catch up to all of the Anti Bush threads. 4,038 to go.
Sure, just like all republicans are neo con war mongers. You know, how McCain was labeled by the Democratic party.FatherTed wrote:
Soo liberals all lie chronically?lowing wrote:
Because like a true liberal, they say one thing and no something else, hypocrisy. They set a standard that they themselves have no intention of following, double standards. They feel they are in a position of power that should be immune ( until they get caught) entitlement.TheAussieReaper wrote:
Then what's your problem? Why create a thread about tax cheats and lobbyists?
NOT to even mention this is what Nobama said he would not tolerate. a liar.
Liberalism abound
Malloy must go
Oh shut up about liberalism.
Cybargs wrote:
Oh shut up about liberalism.
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Shut up about the war on terror....oh wait that didn't work before.FatherTed wrote:
Cybargs wrote:
Oh shut up about liberalism.
Malloy must go
It's ok. Thats the kind of response I expect from your kind.Cybargs wrote:
Oh shut up about liberalism.
Malloy must go
Timezones? Never heard of it.TheAussieReaper wrote:
It's a thing called timezones. I won't get into the details of it, but I can't post at the same time you can.lowing wrote:
Why don't you get back into that other thread that you abandoned when you couldn't pin racism on me with your demographics comment? YOu left so abruptly after you asked a question and I answered it. Whats the problem?TheAussieReaper wrote:
Hopefully you'll have 8 years to reach that number.
This may surprise you but I watched the superbowl live from about 10am in the morning on Monday.
What is it called when you post in every other thread except the one in question? Is that this timezone thing you are speaking of??
It's called liberal debate tactic.lowing wrote:
Timezones? Never heard of it.TheAussieReaper wrote:
It's a thing called timezones. I won't get into the details of it, but I can't post at the same time you can.lowing wrote:
Why don't you get back into that other thread that you abandoned when you couldn't pin racism on me with your demographics comment? YOu left so abruptly after you asked a question and I answered it. Whats the problem?
This may surprise you but I watched the superbowl live from about 10am in the morning on Monday.
What is it called when you post in every other thread except the one in question? Is that this timezone thing you are speaking of??
Malloy must go
My kind? wtf do you mean "My Kind".deeznutz1245 wrote:
It's ok. Thats the kind of response I expect from your kind.Cybargs wrote:
Oh shut up about liberalism.
Hell, I supported McCain during his campaign, I personally like him better than Obama.
I would have expected you to be more mature about this debate rahter than turn this thread into a Libs vs Cons.
wtf is with all these labels lately, just cause you're a liberal you support this, just cause you're a conservative you support that.
This thread has been completley derailed GG guys.
Deez: I am pissed at Obama for his stimulus package and the fact that the inauguration costed so much. Just don't bash liberalism because of him, that's like stooping down to bashing all conservatives because of bush.
Until Obama invades another country, starts suspending civil rights or torturing POWs I think I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt.
I mean really, he's been in office how many days and the Neo-cons are already wetting their knickers?
I mean really, he's been in office how many days and the Neo-cons are already wetting their knickers?
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2009-02-03 04:51:47)
Fuck Israel
Right. Its a Lowing thread buddy, it was derailed when he clicked submit.Cybargs wrote:
This thread has been completley derailed GG guys.
I don't like anything about liberalism and I do believe that the members of this forum of left persuasion have done plenty of conservative bashing and labeling over the last few years, no?Cybargs wrote:
Just don't bash liberalism because of him, that's like stooping down to bashing all conservatives because of bush.
Malloy must go
This thread is about the liberals in power, Nobama is supposed t obring change, yet he fills the govt. with tax cheats and lobbists AFTER he says ethics will be at the fore front of his nominations....You all give him a pass for this, the same group that blamed Bush for the wind directionCybargs wrote:
My kind? wtf do you mean "My Kind".deeznutz1245 wrote:
It's ok. Thats the kind of response I expect from your kind.Cybargs wrote:
Oh shut up about liberalism.
Hell, I supported McCain during his campaign, I personally like him better than Obama.
I would have expected you to be more mature about this debate rahter than turn this thread into a Libs vs Cons.
wtf is with all these labels lately, just cause you're a liberal you support this, just cause you're a conservative you support that.
This thread has been completley derailed GG guys.
Deez: I am pissed at Obama for his stimulus package and the fact that the inauguration costed so much. Just don't bash liberalism because of him, that's like stooping down to bashing all conservatives because of bush.
YOu all scream, give him a change he has only been in office for a few weeks, yet look at what he has done in that short of time.
Last edited by lowing (2009-02-03 04:54:33)
Which is ironic because the country he invaded tortured just about everybody and had zero civil rights. Plenty of rights for women too I believe.Dilbert_X wrote:
Until Obama invades another country, starts suspending civil rights or torturing POWs I think I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt.
I mean really, he's been in office how many days and the Neo-cons are already wetting their knickers?
Malloy must go
Don't stoop down to their level, they just hatin.deeznutz1245 wrote:
Right. Its a Lowing thread buddy, it was derailed when he clicked submit.Cybargs wrote:
This thread has been completley derailed GG guys.I don't like anything about liberalism and I do believe that the members of this forum of left persuasion have done plenty of conservative bashing and labeling over the last few years, no?Cybargs wrote:
Just don't bash liberalism because of him, that's like stooping down to bashing all conservatives because of bush.
I see a lot of the left posting anti-israel shit calling them baby killers and calling servicemen serving in Iraq baby killers and shit. I personally find it a disgrace.
I don't trust Barry O that much personally, don't mean you have to bash liberals because of that. Bash Obama because of his policies, don't bash all liberals because of him.
But I don't like liberals, it has zip to do with Nobama. Liberals want me to pay for social services that I believe enable a society into further laziness.Cybargs wrote:
I don't trust Barry O that much personally, don't mean you have to bash liberals because of that. Bash Obama because of his policies, don't bash all liberals because of him.
Malloy must go
Sorry, I can't do that. It is that sense of entitlement and govt. taking care of them that put Obama in office. So yes, it is that liberal attitude that is at fault.Cybargs wrote:
Don't stoop down to their level, they just hatin.deeznutz1245 wrote:
Right. Its a Lowing thread buddy, it was derailed when he clicked submit.Cybargs wrote:
This thread has been completley derailed GG guys.I don't like anything about liberalism and I do believe that the members of this forum of left persuasion have done plenty of conservative bashing and labeling over the last few years, no?Cybargs wrote:
Just don't bash liberalism because of him, that's like stooping down to bashing all conservatives because of bush.
I see a lot of the left posting anti-israel shit calling them baby killers and calling servicemen serving in Iraq baby killers and shit. I personally find it a disgrace.
I don't trust Barry O that much personally, don't mean you have to bash liberals because of that. Bash Obama because of his policies, don't bash all liberals because of him.
I just find it funny how most of the news is talking about how he's black and all. He's the first black pres, he's gonna do fine kekekes guise ^^. I think he's gonna put the US more indebt tbh...
Nobody but Dilbert has responded to the OP.
Dilbert: He hoodwinked everyone and he is proving a lot of us naysayers correct. I am not reveling in this, I was actually hoping for the best.
Dilbert: He hoodwinked everyone and he is proving a lot of us naysayers correct. I am not reveling in this, I was actually hoping for the best.
"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation" - Barack Obama (a freshman senator from Illinios)
That doesn't make the torture you subjected Iraqi's to as forgivable.deeznutz1245 wrote:
Which is ironic because the country he invaded tortured just about everybody and had zero civil rights. Plenty of rights for women too I believe.Dilbert_X wrote:
Until Obama invades another country, starts suspending civil rights or torturing POWs I think I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt.
I mean really, he's been in office how many days and the Neo-cons are already wetting their knickers?
Good god, what is the purpose of these threads? To show that some of the liberals on this forum are guilty of double standards? Doesn't the absence of threads like these authored by conservatives during the Bush administration prove that precisely the same is applicable to them?
You guys are having fist fights with hand grenades. Whatever you're trying to prove, you inadvertently prove yourselves guilty of the same.
We all know there are hypocrites on both sides of the political spectrum. We don't need dozens of threads pointing this out by going "Nyah nyah!"
You guys are having fist fights with hand grenades. Whatever you're trying to prove, you inadvertently prove yourselves guilty of the same.
We all know there are hypocrites on both sides of the political spectrum. We don't need dozens of threads pointing this out by going "Nyah nyah!"
No but it seems to make what Saddam did non existent apparently.TheAussieReaper wrote:
That doesn't make the torture you subjected Iraqi's to as forgivable.deeznutz1245 wrote:
Which is ironic because the country he invaded tortured just about everybody and had zero civil rights. Plenty of rights for women too I believe.Dilbert_X wrote:
Until Obama invades another country, starts suspending civil rights or torturing POWs I think I'm going to give him the benefit of the doubt.
I mean really, he's been in office how many days and the Neo-cons are already wetting their knickers?
Malloy must go
What Saddam did still does not warrant the use of torture.deeznutz1245 wrote:
No but it seems to make what Saddam did non existent apparently.TheAussieReaper wrote:
That doesn't make the torture you subjected Iraqi's to as forgivable.deeznutz1245 wrote:
Which is ironic because the country he invaded tortured just about everybody and had zero civil rights. Plenty of rights for women too I believe.
do you have a cousin named buballoo (sp)? lolTheAussieReaper wrote:
What Saddam did still does not warrant the use of torture.deeznutz1245 wrote:
No but it seems to make what Saddam did non existent apparently.TheAussieReaper wrote:
That doesn't make the torture you subjected Iraqi's to as forgivable.
Love is the answer
Gasp! How did you know? lol[TUF]Catbox wrote:
do you have a cousin named buballoo (sp)? lol
I think the US is even more partisan than here in Northern Ireland. It seams you can't have a mixture or liberal and conservative views. You must fit in a box, you must be one or the other. Its bullshit. I couldn't fit myself into either of them. I pride myself on having an open view on my countries politics. I don't simply listen to Liberal news stations and take them as gospel and rubbish conservative news stations. Because there are no liberal or conservative news stations. Some news stations have a back ground addenda, it doesn't make them a lib of a con, it makes them a news station with an addenda. A spade is a spade and so on.Cybargs wrote:
wtf is with all these labels lately, just cause you're a liberal you support this, just cause you're a conservative you support that.
I remember how the "libs" critized Bush at every turn and the cons defended him in every thread. Seams the same is happening now in reverse. The ppl who defended everything Bush done are now attacking Obama and visa versa. I wish ppl would just admit that that is they way it is.
Personally I am going to give Obama a few months and if he is fucking up in my opinion, I shall say it. But I am giving him a chance.
Last edited by JahManRed (2009-02-03 06:23:30)