What are your thoughts on this?
Edit: Vic was killed in a roadside bomb last July, his real name was Mike.
Last edited by MAGUIRE93 (2009-01-28 12:39:44)
Last edited by MAGUIRE93 (2009-01-28 12:39:44)
Last edited by CameronPoe (2009-01-28 14:32:03)
Well all of them have to be out by 2011.Turquoise wrote:
I understand your viewpoint, Cam, but let's face it... We have a lot of bases in Iraq. It's not like we're just going to leave tomorrow.
This is probably going to be like a lot of other conflicts we've had. We'll keep a certain amount of troops in Iraq for the long haul.
The real question will be how long we'll maintain current troop levels. Drawing down levels to their necessary minimums would take something like 15 months. I'm not even sure if that process has begun yet.
Where did you see that?CameronPoe wrote:
Well all of them have to be out by 2011.Turquoise wrote:
I understand your viewpoint, Cam, but let's face it... We have a lot of bases in Iraq. It's not like we're just going to leave tomorrow.
This is probably going to be like a lot of other conflicts we've had. We'll keep a certain amount of troops in Iraq for the long haul.
The real question will be how long we'll maintain current troop levels. Drawing down levels to their necessary minimums would take something like 15 months. I'm not even sure if that process has begun yet.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008 … 344224.htmTurquoise wrote:
Where did you see that?CameronPoe wrote:
Well all of them have to be out by 2011.Turquoise wrote:
I understand your viewpoint, Cam, but let's face it... We have a lot of bases in Iraq. It's not like we're just going to leave tomorrow.
This is probably going to be like a lot of other conflicts we've had. We'll keep a certain amount of troops in Iraq for the long haul.
The real question will be how long we'll maintain current troop levels. Drawing down levels to their necessary minimums would take something like 15 months. I'm not even sure if that process has begun yet.
Last edited by CameronPoe (2009-01-28 14:49:43)
Hmm... We should definitely get started now then. Emptying out the bases is gonna be a bitch.CameronPoe wrote:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008 … 344224.htmTurquoise wrote:
Where did you see that?CameronPoe wrote:
Well all of them have to be out by 2011.
http://www.militaryspot.com/news/us-ira … l-pact/528
Passed in the Iraqi parliament. Done and dusted.
Next stop Hollywood for that promising director.zeidmaan wrote:
wow that soooo melodramatic
Correct... biased, badly edited horseshit.ghettoperson wrote:
I started watching that, saw the bit about 'traitors' and showing Pelosi and Reid, and it promptly needed to buffer, so I left it at that. I'm assuming the rest was similar crap.