Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5889

I've been thinking about writing something like this for awhile and since I could post it somewhere like bf2s and have people comment on it I've decided to post it. I know I'll probably be flamed for this, be it my poor writing skills or backwards logic but nobody here knows me in the real world so I could live with that. Also mods if anyone flames me I don't care don't punish them please.

Keep in mind I'm an atheist. But this is not meant to bash religion this is actually meant to defend it. I'm not going to respond to the thread I just want to hear others thoughts on it.

Ok

So I love watching debates especially debates regarding religion's role in the world. Though I agree with most of the atheist argument's except for one that I never really understood.

I've never been able to understand the "Religion has killed more people in history then anything else". I'm not going to argue that fact either way but instead go into how the death caused from religion benefited the world.

"Religion have been the cause of more wars then anything else". Not really. Yes it can be argued that every war had a religious factor not many wars have been caused primarily because of religion. It's exactly because of that religious factor that the victors were able to push on through hard times and win. Sometimes. Unless you live in the middle of nowhere and your people have not communicated with the outside world in the last 5000 years you shouldn't complain about religion. Especially if you live in the West.

Lets start with the Greeks. Despite their philosophical differences each city state had two things in common. Race and religion. It was because of these two things that they were able to unite several times to defeat invading Persians or to in fact invade Persia later on. Without religion to push them to fight harder or sacrifice a little more who's to say Alexander the Great would have never conquered most of Persia and founded cities like Alexandria which was a cultural learning center for years. Or the Greeks who fought the Persians at Thermopylae and saved at least Greece from Persian dominance.  If those mean knew or thought that nothing happened after death would they have stayed to fight? Would the world know Greek democracy or Persian theocracy?

The Romans. Same religion as the Greeks just with different names. Same ideas, stories, and thoughts. Having their religion as a booster they were able to conquer most of Europe and spread the language of Latin. Of Latin we get French, Spanish, Italian, and Portuguese. Because of their dominance Civilization spread throughout Europe.

After the collapse of the Romans, Europe stagnated for several centuries in a period called the Dark Ages. The dominant power to rise out of this period was the Pope. With the power to excommunicate leaders from Christianity and to called upon entire nations to do it's bidding the world saw just a bit of stabilization.

Now before we talk about the Crusades. Yes I would say it was needless bloodshed and yes it did poison relations between Muslims and Christians till this day.  But if it wasn't for the Crusades how would the world be different? Out of the Crusades Europe saw a period of peace between nations that had been pretty hostile for a long time. Also there was a nice exchange of technology between both sides which raised the standard of life for the survivors. Also had it not been for the coming together of Muslims and the experience of war with other advanced powers the Mamluk's would have never been able to defeat the Mongol armies after the destruction of Baghdad.

Forward a bit to invasion of the America's by the Europeans. The pilgrims were spurred by religion to escape to The New World. When they finally settled they were able to push the Native off their lands and set up the conditions for the American Revolution. Which of course led to the United States. So yes my fellow Atheist, I will concede that America was not founded on the basis of religion but it was founded by the religious.

Because of their perceived moral, racial, and spiritual superiority as well as greed the Spanish were able to defeat the Aztecs and take control of huge part of the Americas. Well that and their technology. But it was their religion and greed which kept them motivated enough to commit genocide. Yes I'll say the Spanish did commit genocide on the natives. But it was so long ago that nobody here can say they knew a single Aztec or other south American group's member and the progress in the Americas which followed out weighed the harm of the genocide hundreds of years before. But NO it is not ok to commit genocide. Nowadays.

So just these few examples which I'm going to list because I don't have time to post every single war of religion in Europe or the New World from the year 200 BC to the year 1912 AD and then use it to point out how it shaped the world. Keep in mind had the ball bounced a little differently. Nobody on this forum would be here. People of mixed race in Europe have a common religious background to thank for that. American's have to thank the genocidal lunatic Spanish and the fanatical Pilgrims for the founding of their nations.

Had there not been a war here or there wiping out thousands of people we would have not been born. At least not the way we are. Had there not been a war that killed 100,000 of Germans would your ancestors have married and had children with different people? Would the full blooded German who was on his way back from  failed Crusade have not reached a village somewhere far away from his home and not seen a young woman and fell in love and started your bloodline?

So Americans and Europeans should never use the "wars by religion killed millions of ancient people" line because had it not been for those millions of deaths caused by and helped by religion the world we know and the life you know would be vastly different.

I read something ATG once posted about Obama and McCain. went something like-
"The evil you know is better then the evil you don't."
I know it wasn't his original quote but it's good for this situation. We wouldn't know what would have happened without religion but considering the circumstances, we all have access to high speed internet, live in countries with high standards, could afford to pour hundreds if not thousands of hours into a video game, it is better the way this turned out then to roll the dice and to have never had religion.

Done.
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6456|what

uevjHEYFFQ wrote:

Had there not been a war here or there wiping out thousands of people we would have not been born. At least not the way we are. Had there not been a war that killed 100,000 of Germans would your ancestors have married and had children with different people? Would the full blooded German who was on his way back from  failed Crusade have not reached a village somewhere far away from his home and not seen a young woman and fell in love and started your bloodline?
So we should be thankful that there were millions of deaths in wars before we were born, because without them we wouldn't be here?

GTFO.

That's one of the most selfish reasons for war I've heard yet.

These people didn't fight and die so that by some fated chance you could be born centuries after the fact. That's an unbelievable assertion and I think you have no understanding whatsoever about religion, or any religion at all.

You start with the Greeks? You could have gone way back before them, take Zoroastrianism for a start. That's one of the earliest religions to have the concept of good vs evil, light against darkness. It was they who first developed these ideas, religion then applied the non-believers to the dark side which is where religion became an "excuse" to kill your evil neighbouring empires.

The Persian were more unified under one God, Ahura Mazda than the Greeks were with many so forget your claim about religion being the factor that one the Greco-Persian wars.

The Greeks were not unified by that religion anyway. They were independent city states, they acted together only in times of great threat. That threat being invasion by Persians. Otherwise they went back to the independent city states as normal.

Not until the city state Kings fought for dominance and the emergence of Alexander did the Greeks truly become a single "nation" - and to think the Romans were the same as the Greeks in terms of deities is further emphasis you know nothing.

The Romans were polytheistic and allowed freedom of religion in all but very few cases, Judaism for example. They adopted and integrated many religions and adapted religions from all over the Mediterranean, Middle East, Africa, India and North Europe. Soldiers would worship completely different Gods to farmers and completely different Gods to women. Look up Mithraism - the Persian religion adapted for soldiers and how to evolved under the Roman military.

And after the Roman empire collapsed it wasn't suddenly lights out. The Germanic tribes of the north unified together after decades of fighting themselves and then fighting against the common enemy of Rome and swept through Italy. They were not unified by religion. For the most part each tribe spoke a unique dialect and worshiped independently a number of varied deities.

I'll stop there cause your whole post is just too ignorant. The religious wars throughout the last three thousand years have brought about nothing but death. No unity, unless through conquest.

Last edited by TheAussieReaper (2009-01-21 18:56:16)

https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
blademaster
I'm moving to Brazil
+2,075|6949

TheAussieReaper wrote:

uevjHEYFFQ wrote:

Had there not been a war here or there wiping out thousands of people we would have not been born. At least not the way we are. Had there not been a war that killed 100,000 of Germans would your ancestors have married and had children with different people? Would the full blooded German who was on his way back from  failed Crusade have not reached a village somewhere far away from his home and not seen a young woman and fell in love and started your bloodline?
So we should be thankful that there were millions of deaths in wars before we were born, because without them we wouldn't be here?

GTFO.

That's one of the most selfish reasons for war I've heard yet.

These people didn't fight and die so that by some fated chance you could be born centuries after the fact. That's an unbelievable assertion and I think you have no understanding whatsoever about religion, or any religion at all.

You start with the Greeks? You could have gone way back before them, take Zoroastrianism for a start. That's one of the earliest religions to have the concept of good vs evil, light against darkness. It was they who first developed these ideas, religion then applied the non-believers to the dark side which is where religion became an "excuse" to kill your neighbouring empires.

The Greeks were not unified by religion either. They were independent city states, they acted together only in times of great threat. Not until the city state Kings fought for dominance and the emergence of Alexander did the Greeks truly become a single "nation" - and to think the Romans were the same as the Greeks in terms of deities is further emphasis you know nothing.

The Romans were polytheistic and allowed freedom of religion in all but very few cases, Judaism for example. They adopted and integrated many religions and adapted religions from all over the Mediterranean, Middle East, Africa, India and North Europe. Soldiers would worship completely different Gods to farmers and completely different Gods to women. Look up Mithraism and how to evolved under the Roman military.

I'll stop there cause your whole post is just too ignorant. The religious wars throughout the last three thousand years have brought about nothing but death. No unity, unless through conquest.
"The Romans were polytheistic and allowed freedom of religion in all but very few cases, Judaism for example." hmm you are wrong there they did not allow freedom of Religion "In 64 A.D. the Roman Emperor Caesar Nero attempted to systematically exterminate all people who professed faith in the newfound Christian religion.

Many factors played a major part in promoting this Empire wide genocide. Nero needed a scape goat of his own, so he chose to blame the Christians; a new 'Jewish' sect that was hated by the Roman people.  Christians and others were hated because they refused to worship the Emperor, and refused the traditions, and gods of the Roman people. The Roman Government, by law, could not torture Roman citizens.

Although Nero's persecution may not have killed as many people as Hitler did, or as many people as died in the crusades, or in the Spanish Inquisition - the sheer brutality made this a true disaster of the worst kind. No person ought to be subject to the tortures that these men and women had to go through. These people did not merely have to die for their faith, they had to experience the worst kind of suffering that this world has to offer.

source
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6456|what

blademaster wrote:

"The Romans were polytheistic and allowed freedom of religion in all but very few cases, Judaism for example." hmm you are wrong there they did not allow freedom of Religion "In 64 A.D. the Roman Emperor Caesar Nero attempted to systematically exterminate all people who professed faith in the newfound Christian religion.

Many factors played a major part in promoting this Empire wide genocide. Nero needed a scape goat of his own, so he chose to blame the Christians; a new 'Jewish' sect that was hated by the Roman people.  Christians and others were hated because they refused to worship the Emperor, and refused the traditions, and gods of the Roman people. The Roman Government, by law, could not torture Roman citizens.

Although Nero's persecution may not have killed as many people as Hitler did, or as many people as died in the crusades, or in the Spanish Inquisition - the sheer brutality made this a true disaster of the worst kind. No person ought to be subject to the tortures that these men and women had to go through. These people did not merely have to die for their faith, they had to experience the worst kind of suffering that this world has to offer.

source
I don't know what part of "in all but a few cases, Judaism for example" you took me to saying that Christianity was an accepted faith. Maybe you thought when I said a few cases I didn't mean Christianity.

But please, keep putting words into my mouth and arguing against my imaginary stance anyway...
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6804|so randum
Thats actually a good OP for debate, jobz
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
topthrill05
Member
+125|6882|Rochester NY USA
I think the main issue with your argument is the infinite possibilities that are associating in the making of your reality and your present reality. Spend some time thinking about that and.... well I think you will see that your argument covers very little ground and meaning. But at its core yes religion has greatly influenced everything for the past 10-20k years or so. But one might say the evolution of religion is one that occurs naturally in the set of genetic and pure fucking luck that got us here today.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,817|6409|eXtreme to the maX
Can't think of anything positive to come out of religion.
Handy for keeping people in line I guess, so you can brainwash them for battle.
Fuck Israel
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6978|Canberra, AUS

Dilbert_X wrote:

Can't think of anything positive to come out of religion.
Handy for keeping people in line I guess, so you can brainwash them for battle.
That's a shame. I can think of plenty - mainly at the grassroots level.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6456|what

Spark wrote:

That's a shame. I can think of plenty - mainly at the grassroots level.
Religion isn't the cause for morality and ethics, in either our or the ancient cultures.

It has been used to turn away from those principals however.
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|6978|Canberra, AUS

TheAussieReaper wrote:

Spark wrote:

That's a shame. I can think of plenty - mainly at the grassroots level.
Religion isn't the cause for morality and ethics, in either our or the ancient cultures.

It has been used to turn away from those principals however.
No, but it can motivate people. That's extremely important. Perhaps it's not religion I'm think of but religious people.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|7069|Cambridge (UK)

Spark wrote:

TheAussieReaper wrote:

Spark wrote:

That's a shame. I can think of plenty - mainly at the grassroots level.
Religion isn't the cause for morality and ethics, in either our or the ancient cultures.

It has been used to turn away from those principals however.
No, but it can motivate people. That's extremely important. Perhaps it's not religion I'm think of but religious people.
Never seen any stats, but I'd have thought the proportion of do-gooding atheists/agnostics would be roughly the same as the proportion of do-gooding theists.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,817|6409|eXtreme to the maX
In my experience theists do less, because they think they don't need to.
Fuck Israel
LividBovine
The Year of the Cow!
+175|6683|MN

Dilbert_X wrote:

In my experience theists do less, because they think they don't need to.
I would disagree.  In my experience religous people (at least all the Christians I know) are much more giving of their time and resources than atheist.
"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation" - Barack Obama (a freshman senator from Illinios)
13/f/taiwan
Member
+940|6002
Without religion we wouldn't be this advanced in terms of science and technology.
Agent_Dung_Bomb
Member
+302|7040|Salt Lake City

12/f/taiwan wrote:

Without religion we wouldn't be this advanced in terms of science and technology.
Yeah, I was also a bit perplexed.  Religion has often stifled science when their findings/hypothesis ran counter to religious dogma.
Hakei
Banned
+295|6299
Religion gave people a reason for existance, hence gave people a drive to survive - hence how cities were formed.

Egypt is a prime example, religion gave them a meaning for existance and gave a reason to survive together.
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6833|Global Command

Hakei wrote:

Religion gave people a reason for existance, hence gave people a drive to survive - hence how cities were formed.

Egypt is a prime example, religion gave them a meaning for existance and gave a reason to survive together.
Oh please.
Cities were established at places where springs provided for water for animals, and at cross roads for trade.

Food is the primary reason people grouped together.

Religion may be many things positive, but it also the second oldest profession.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6709|North Carolina
As much as I dislike religion, I do believe it is a necessary evil.

If logic alone could keep most people compassionate, I'd be all for the disintegration of religion, but something I definitely agree with Christians on is that our innate natures are flawed.  Humans are simply too selfish to be compassionate on a mass scale without some element of religion being involved.  Even highly secular societies have some religious heritage to connect to the morals they currently follow.

For example, the Czech Republic is one of the most secular societies in the world, but they have a long history of Christianity to draw from culturally.

Of course, as Dilbert mentioned, religion also has a long history of brainwashing people.  It's a double-edged sword in that it promotes order, but it also can be used to promote conflict.

For the most part, religion is not needed on an individual basis for people that are highly logical, but for the less logical, it's a useful way to keep them from being too selfish.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6709|North Carolina

ATG wrote:

Hakei wrote:

Religion gave people a reason for existance, hence gave people a drive to survive - hence how cities were formed.

Egypt is a prime example, religion gave them a meaning for existance and gave a reason to survive together.
Oh please.
Cities were established at places where springs provided for water for animals, and at cross roads for trade.

Food is the primary reason people grouped together.

Religion may be many things positive, but it also the second oldest profession.
He's right though.  Some people just aren't content to accept life for what it is...  In fact, I'd wager a guess that most people aren't.

Religion tended to be stronger when science was primitive, because so many questions were left unanswered by our senses.  Humans do have a natural tendency to question their surroundings and desire answers for deep questions.

Unfortunately, this curiosity is rarely tempered with an equal capacity for logical analysis.
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5889

Said I wouldn't post but I think people missed the point.

Atheist in debates cite religious wars as a major reason why there shouldn't be religion. They cite these wars even though their countries haven't been in a religious war for several hundred years. They also seem to not realize how these wars no matter their outcome have affected their country positively to this day and had a part in their own existence.

Like the crusader coming back starting your bloodline or your country being founded by religious zealots who destroyed the natives or the spread of the base language which lead to your own or the crusade which stabilized relations between your countries or the crusade which brought back new technology and ideas to your country.

No matter how many people died in a religious war, way before your great great grandfather was born, if you live in the west you benefited from it.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6709|North Carolina

uevjHEYFFQ wrote:

Said I wouldn't post but I think people missed the point.

Atheist in debates cite religious wars as a major reason why there shouldn't be religion. They cite these wars even though their countries haven't been in a religious war for several hundred years. They also seem to not realize how these wars no matter their outcome have affected their country positively to this day and had a part in their own existence.

Like the crusader coming back starting your bloodline or your country being founded by religious zealots who destroyed the natives or the spread of the base language which lead to your own or the crusade which stabilized relations between your countries or the crusade which brought back new technology and ideas to your country.

No matter how many people died in a religious war, way before your great great grandfather was born, if you live in the west you benefited from it.
Your argument works for certain cultures, but for many indigenous cultures...  not so much.
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5889

Turquoise wrote:

uevjHEYFFQ wrote:

Said I wouldn't post but I think people missed the point.

Atheist in debates cite religious wars as a major reason why there shouldn't be religion. They cite these wars even though their countries haven't been in a religious war for several hundred years. They also seem to not realize how these wars no matter their outcome have affected their country positively to this day and had a part in their own existence.

Like the crusader coming back starting your bloodline or your country being founded by religious zealots who destroyed the natives or the spread of the base language which lead to your own or the crusade which stabilized relations between your countries or the crusade which brought back new technology and ideas to your country.

No matter how many people died in a religious war, way before your great great grandfather was born, if you live in the west you benefited from it.
Your argument works for certain cultures, but for many indigenous cultures...  not so much.
Well at least you understood the short version and didn't get angry after misunderstanding the long version. That is why I said live in the west. It seems like the most vocal atheist come from Western countries and don't realize that without all those religious wars they wouldn't exist or be able to proclaim their atheism.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6709|North Carolina

uevjHEYFFQ wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

uevjHEYFFQ wrote:

Said I wouldn't post but I think people missed the point.

Atheist in debates cite religious wars as a major reason why there shouldn't be religion. They cite these wars even though their countries haven't been in a religious war for several hundred years. They also seem to not realize how these wars no matter their outcome have affected their country positively to this day and had a part in their own existence.

Like the crusader coming back starting your bloodline or your country being founded by religious zealots who destroyed the natives or the spread of the base language which lead to your own or the crusade which stabilized relations between your countries or the crusade which brought back new technology and ideas to your country.

No matter how many people died in a religious war, way before your great great grandfather was born, if you live in the west you benefited from it.
Your argument works for certain cultures, but for many indigenous cultures...  not so much.
Well at least you understood the short version and didn't get angry after misunderstanding the long version. That is why I said live in the west. It seems like the most vocal atheist come from Western countries and don't realize that without all those religious wars they wouldn't exist or be able to proclaim their atheism.
Eh...  sort of.  The moderation of religion does occur over time due to conflict, but saying that religion is the reason they have the freedom of speech is a bit...  problematic in a logical sense.

It would be more accurate to say that conflict is part of why freedoms currently exist, but this does not require religion.  More often than not, economics are the real reason a war is fought.  Religion is often just a cover story for the conflict to engender a "moral dilemma."
Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5889

Turquoise wrote:

uevjHEYFFQ wrote:

Turquoise wrote:


Your argument works for certain cultures, but for many indigenous cultures...  not so much.
Well at least you understood the short version and didn't get angry after misunderstanding the long version. That is why I said live in the west. It seems like the most vocal atheist come from Western countries and don't realize that without all those religious wars they wouldn't exist or be able to proclaim their atheism.
Eh...  sort of.  The moderation of religion does occur over time due to conflict, but saying that religion is the reason they have the freedom of speech is a bit...  problematic in a logical sense.

It would be more accurate to say that conflict is part of why freedoms currently exist, but this does not require religion.  More often than not, economics are the real reason a war is fought.  Religion is often just a cover story for the conflict to engender a "moral dilemma."
Yeah I know freedom of speech doesn't come from religion but countries which have the most free speech where started either by the extremely religious or another nation of extremely religious.

Yes most wars are due to economic or social issues and religion is just used as an excuse but you can't say that of the few religious wars that there wasn't some long term benefit.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6709|North Carolina

uevjHEYFFQ wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

uevjHEYFFQ wrote:


Well at least you understood the short version and didn't get angry after misunderstanding the long version. That is why I said live in the west. It seems like the most vocal atheist come from Western countries and don't realize that without all those religious wars they wouldn't exist or be able to proclaim their atheism.
Eh...  sort of.  The moderation of religion does occur over time due to conflict, but saying that religion is the reason they have the freedom of speech is a bit...  problematic in a logical sense.

It would be more accurate to say that conflict is part of why freedoms currently exist, but this does not require religion.  More often than not, economics are the real reason a war is fought.  Religion is often just a cover story for the conflict to engender a "moral dilemma."
Yeah I know freedom of speech doesn't come from religion but countries which have the most free speech where started either by the extremely religious or another nation of extremely religious.

Yes most wars are due to economic or social issues and religion is just used as an excuse but you can't say that of the few religious wars that there wasn't some long term benefit.
Well, everything has pros and cons, yes.  Still, there is one problem with this line of discussion.  It's all hypothetical.  There is no way of knowing what exactly would have happened without all this war.

Only a few things can be logically assumed.  One, the world's population would likely be much larger today than it currently is.  Two, the distribution of this population would likely be very different than the current arrangement.  The Age of Exploration might have turned out differently without religion.

Beyond that, it's mostly conjecture.  There does seem to be a correlation between societal conflicts driven by religious disputes and the development of social progress.  However, many countries have had long religious feuds without advancing much socially.

For example, there is a vast difference in how things turned out for Europe socially through religious conflict and how the Middle East turned out from religious conflict.  Europe went through a period of enlightenment and an industrial revolution, whereas the Middle East had its own enlightenment period but never quite experienced the same industrial advancement until very recently.

One could argue that technology actually has a greater bearing on social progress than religion.

For example, when people understood the concept of microbes, this forever changed the nature of medicine.  Superstitions dwindled away while careful analyses replaced them.

For the societies that did not experience medical advancements until later on, social customs remained heavily affected by superstitions concerning disease -- which were often religious in nature.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard