Let's run your little test using, oh lets say Google.lowing wrote:
Yup sure do, but the real answer just couldn't be because there are in fact a shit load more examples of Islamic terrorism over Hindu terrorism in the worlc could it?
Exactly. Buy try explaining to lowing why Islamic terrorism has more hits is futile. The fact that we create more threads about Islam than we do about Hindi has nothing to do with it in his mind.Vilham wrote:
gotta put the words in quotes to actually search that term, otherwise its looking for the word, hindu and then the word terrorism, even if the article doesnt have both.
Actually I just picked one, I never woulda guessed the results. You can go a decade without hearing the word Hindu on the news in the papers or on the net ( if you were not looking for it). SO what is the explaination for this?TheAussieReaper wrote:
Let's run your little test using, oh lets say Google.lowing wrote:
Yup sure do, but the real answer just couldn't be because there are in fact a shit load more examples of Islamic terrorism over Hindu terrorism in the worlc could it?
Hindu terrorism. Vs Islamic terrorism.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v83/r … rorism.png
Well done lowing.
So you knew your results were bullshit and you posted them anyway?? Not sure I get thatTheAussieReaper wrote:
Exactly. Buy try explaining to lowing why Islamic terrorism has more hits is futile. The fact that we create more threads about Islam than we do about Hindi has nothing to do with it in his mind.Vilham wrote:
gotta put the words in quotes to actually search that term, otherwise its looking for the word, hindu and then the word terrorism, even if the article doesnt have both.
Weird. I would have thought after the Mumbai attacks, that was a lot of media involving Hindu's and what their response would be to the attacks.lowing wrote:
Actually I just picked one, I never woulda guessed the results. You can go a decade without hearing the word Hindu on the news in the papers or on the net ( if you were not looking for it). SO what is the explaination for this?
I knew you wouldn't pick up on it. Even after saying you knew how search engines work.lowing wrote:
So you knew your results were bullshit and you posted them anyway?? Not sure I get thatTheAussieReaper wrote:
Exactly. Buy try explaining to lowing why Islamic terrorism has more hits is futile. The fact that we create more threads about Islam than we do about Hindi has nothing to do with it in his mind.Vilham wrote:
gotta put the words in quotes to actually search that term, otherwise its looking for the word, hindu and then the word terrorism, even if the article doesnt have both.
Yeah that is it, my eyes are closedTheAussieReaper wrote:
Weird. I would have thought after the Mumbai attacks, that was a lot of media involving Hindu's and what their response would be to the attacks.lowing wrote:
Actually I just picked one, I never woulda guessed the results. You can go a decade without hearing the word Hindu on the news in the papers or on the net ( if you were not looking for it). SO what is the explaination for this?
I guess if you close your eyes and don't read anything it's easy to miss the word Hindu in the news also.
Well with your correction my point is even more validated. Appreciate the lessonTheAussieReaper wrote:
I knew you wouldn't pick up on it. Even after saying you knew how search engines work.lowing wrote:
So you knew your results were bullshit and you posted them anyway?? Not sure I get thatTheAussieReaper wrote:
Exactly. Buy try explaining to lowing why Islamic terrorism has more hits is futile. The fact that we create more threads about Islam than we do about Hindi has nothing to do with it in his mind.
Guess you were shooting blanks with that statement, huh?
Last edited by [TUF]Catbox (2009-01-11 19:48:00)
You've failed to pick up on it, actually. Search engines pick up on all sources, as shown with Hindu terrorism. It will search any site with the words Hindu and terrorism, and then search for them separately.lowing wrote:
Well with your correction my point is even more validated. Appreciate the lesson
Yeah I am, best hting Aussie did for me was show me how search engines work, now it is even easier to cite this religion for what it is[TUF]Catbox wrote:
lowing... are you picking on the religion of peace...? lol
I know how search engines work
http://searchenginewatch.com/2168031
really, as Christians are outraged over stem cell research, Muslims are outraged over cartoons. And your point is what again?TheAussieReaper wrote:
You've failed to pick up on it, actually. Search engines pick up on all sources, as shown with Hindu terrorism. It will search any site with the words Hindu and terrorism, and then search for them separately.lowing wrote:
Well with your correction my point is even more validated. Appreciate the lesson
Search for Islamic terrorism and you aren't limited to the number of instances of it that have occurred, or just the sites reporting it. You pick up forums and every piece of shit irrelevant article you can think of.
Where's the worlds media focused on at the moment? What is the more debated topics? And search engines ignore this do they?
And yet you think a search engine is proof that Muslim outrage is different to Christian outrage? Have a look at what the Muslims are outraged about.
Christians are outraged about the use of stem cell research. You'll pull everything that is included with your search.
Your logic is quite simply astounding.
Click on the advanced button and you can choose even more cool features!!lowing wrote:
Yeah I am, best hting Aussie did for me was show me how search engines work, now it is even easier to cite this religion for what it is
That a search engines results have fuck all to do with:lowing wrote:
really, as Christians are outraged over stem cell research, Muslims are outraged over cartoons. And your point is what again?
lowing wrote:
anyway wanna comment on the fact that islamic terrorism hits more than double than the other hits
I will try it, it is like Christmas again.TheAussieReaper wrote:
Click on the advanced button and you can choose even more cool features!!lowing wrote:
Yeah I am, best hting Aussie did for me was show me how search engines work, now it is even easier to cite this religion for what it is
Fixed: Next time don't vote for Hamas or let an institution like Hamas take over your government.TheAussieReaper wrote:
Voting is the best way to change govts. I suggest they DO vote.Harmor wrote:
OP: Next time don't vote or let Hamas take over your government.
Yeah, thought that was what you had meant.Harmor wrote:
Fixed: Next time don't vote for Hamas or let an institution like Hamas take over your government.TheAussieReaper wrote:
Voting is the best way to change govts. I suggest they DO vote.Harmor wrote:
OP: Next time don't vote or let Hamas take over your government.
/sarcasm I don't see your pointlowing wrote:
Hmmmmmm try the same thing with "Muslim outrage" and "Christian outrage"
Seems Muslims are quite busy being outraged all over the world more than anyone else... Kinda funny coming from such a peace loving and tolerant culture
