Pages: 1

 

2006-03-16 03:07:16
TodErnst
It's not a bug, it's a feature
+38|6884|Muenster, Germany
I think the Leo II and the Challenger are in real life not so high; or am i wrong ?
In the game these tank have 1+1/2 the height of the MEC-Tank !

Did someone other than Dice do the programmers work ?
2006-03-16 03:13:51
w00tson
Member
+0|6882|Schmuckland
heights
T-90: 2.2m - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-90
Leo2: 3.0m - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leopard_2
Challenger2: 2.5m - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Challenger_2

so I think they have overdone the Challenger 2, but the Leo2 seems about right?

Last edited by w00tson (2006-03-16 03:18:19)

2006-03-16 03:22:55
HellHead
The fantastic Mr. Antichrist
+336|6965|Germany

TodErnst wrote:

I think the Leo II and the Challenger are in real life not so high; or am i wrong ?
In the game these tank have 1+1/2 the height of the MEC-Tank !

Did someone other than Dice do the programmers work ?
Maybe the european legs are shorter and it just "seems" like the tanks are bigger...
2006-03-16 03:39:27
w00tson
Member
+0|6882|Schmuckland
Look! A midget tank!
https://img73.imageshack.us/img73/2536/screen0195nf.jpg

Last edited by w00tson (2006-03-16 14:04:17)

2006-03-16 15:44:32
dubbs
Member
+105|6887|Lexington, KY
It could be to correct the amount of damage a tank takes when it rolls over an ant hill in the game.  They gave them more clearnce, so now it take less damage when rolling over the said ant hill.

 

Pages: 1

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard