Full story: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-p … 812875.stmBBC website wrote:
An Australian woman has appeared in court in Adelaide charged with murdering her husband by setting fire to his penis.
lolaustralians
Full story: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-p … 812875.stmBBC website wrote:
An Australian woman has appeared in court in Adelaide charged with murdering her husband by setting fire to his penis.
Slarty wrote:
Full story: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-p … 812875.stmBBC website wrote:
An Australian woman has appeared in court in Adelaide charged with murdering her husband by setting fire to his penis.
EDIT: LOLSlarty wrote:
lolaustralians
Mrs Narayan told the court she had not intended to kill her husband but to punish him for his alleged infidelity.
Last edited by henno13 (2009-01-06 09:21:23)
lolSlarty wrote:
Full story: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-p … 812875.stmBBC website wrote:
An Australian woman has appeared in court in Adelaide charged with murdering her husband by setting fire to his penis.
lolaustralians
I fucking loved R v Brown! That's the sado-masochistic case concerned in the area of offences against the person and consent, right? Fucking haha, definitely one of the best parts of studying law are reading the actual facts of certain cases concerned and seeing the utter stupidity of the common people. Cases with burglars getting stuck in windows part-way into 'entering' someone elses property, genital torture for kinky fun, coincidence of actus reus and mens rea when some geezer refuses to move his car that accidentally rolls onto a policeman's foot... could go on, fucking hilarious...teddy..jimmy wrote:
lolSlarty wrote:
Full story: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-p … 812875.stmBBC website wrote:
An Australian woman has appeared in court in Adelaide charged with murdering her husband by setting fire to his penis.
lolaustralians
there was a case in England..R v Brown if I remember correctly.
Basically one man poured boiling tar down the urethra of another man's penis.
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Case_law
CrazeD wrote:
How exactly does that kill you?
I mean, yeah, it would hurt like a bitch, but how would that kill you?
It said he "spread the fire"....surely your penis can not contain enough flammable liquid to spread far enough to kill you.
Also,Rajini Narayan, 44, is alleged to have doused her husband, Satish, with a flammable liquid while he was sleeping.
When she set him alight, Mr Narayan jumped out of bed and knocked over the substance, causing the fire to spread.
I think the outcome of that assessment is pretty obvious lol.She has been held in police custody pending the results of a psychological assessment.
Meh. I only skim read.Slarty wrote:
CrazeD wrote:
How exactly does that kill you?
I mean, yeah, it would hurt like a bitch, but how would that kill you?
It said he "spread the fire"....surely your penis can not contain enough flammable liquid to spread far enough to kill you.Also,Rajini Narayan, 44, is alleged to have doused her husband, Satish, with a flammable liquid while he was sleeping.
When she set him alight, Mr Narayan jumped out of bed and knocked over the substance, causing the fire to spread.I think the outcome of that assessment is pretty obvious lol.She has been held in police custody pending the results of a psychological assessment.
Yeah there are some pretty funny cases that exist within the common law but especially within criminal law. The cases get A LOT duller in other areas like contract although I do recall the case brought against Nestle where empty chocolate wrappers in addition to a payment of cash were required for consideration to occur. Very odd but kinda funny.Uzique wrote:
I fucking loved R v Brown! That's the sado-masochistic case concerned in the area of offences against the person and consent, right? Fucking haha, definitely one of the best parts of studying law are reading the actual facts of certain cases concerned and seeing the utter stupidity of the common people. Cases with burglars getting stuck in windows part-way into 'entering' someone elses property, genital torture for kinky fun, coincidence of actus reus and mens rea when some geezer refuses to move his car that accidentally rolls onto a policeman's foot... could go on, fucking hilarious...teddy..jimmy wrote:
lol
there was a case in England..R v Brown if I remember correctly.
Basically one man poured boiling tar down the urethra of another man's penis.
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Wikisource:Case_law
Last edited by ..teddy..jimmy (2009-01-06 12:00:07)
WTF"I just wanted to burn his penis so it belongs to me and no one else, I didn't mean this to happen," Ms Boord quoted Mrs Narayan as saying.
lol.Sup wrote:
mine is fireproof so no worries at this end
tazz. wrote:
Cut it off and give the ol sausage to the dingos.start a successful porn carer. Ala John Wayne Bobbit.