I wonder if our police will figure out the link between AQ and Vietnam like you all have...
- Index »
- Community »
- Debate and Serious Talk »
- More European appeasement of radical islam
Who's ignoring anything? Didn't the Belgian security services foil this terror plot? That's a fucking success; a terror plot foiled without the need to invade a random country... take note America.usmarine wrote:
anyone want to join an "ignore pact" with me? my list will be in my sig shortly. dogbert is numero unolowing wrote:
WHAT!!?? One of the captured terrorists SAID Belgium was the site of one of their targets...How much more proof do ya want? Or is the only way to prove it is to actually let it happen?Dilbert_X wrote:
Not proven at this point.
Get back to the basis of my posts instead of dismissing it because you need proof they were going to attack Belgium before you comment. Lets just assume the admittion by the terrorist they were going to attack Belgium is proof enough for now.
Honestly guys, it's like you want there to be loads of catastrophic terrorist attacks involving innocent people just so as you can say "I told you so".
Last edited by Braddock (2008-12-15 07:36:40)
Yeah, this photo of him had zero impact didn't it?Dilbert_X wrote:
Doesn't really compare with McNamara TBH.MOAB wrote:
Heard of Ngyuen Ngoc Loan? Without Wiki-ing it?
swing and a missBraddock wrote:
Who's ignoring anything? Didn't the Belgian security services foil this terror plot? That's a fucking success; a terror plot foiled without the need to invade a random country... take note America.usmarine wrote:
anyone want to join an "ignore pact" with me? my list will be in my sig shortly. dogbert is numero unolowing wrote:
WHAT!!?? One of the captured terrorists SAID Belgium was the site of one of their targets...How much more proof do ya want? Or is the only way to prove it is to actually let it happen?
Get back to the basis of my posts instead of dismissing it because you need proof they were going to attack Belgium before you comment. Lets just assume the admittion by the terrorist they were going to attack Belgium is proof enough for now.
Honestly guys, it's like you want there to be loads of catastrophic terrorist attacks involving innocent people just so as you can say "I told you so".
Somewhat less impact than the Vietnam war itself - which McNamara was a key architect of - and the basic strategy of the Vietnam war.MOAB wrote:
Yeah, this photo of him had zero impact didn't it?
Doesn't really compare with shooting one guy in the head.
Fuck Israel
Get back to me when we miss another big attack... I see we foiled one in Paris the other day too! Close but no cigar. Diligent policing ftw!usmarine wrote:
swing and a missBraddock wrote:
Who's ignoring anything? Didn't the Belgian security services foil this terror plot? That's a fucking success; a terror plot foiled without the need to invade a random country... take note America.usmarine wrote:
anyone want to join an "ignore pact" with me? my list will be in my sig shortly. dogbert is numero uno
Honestly guys, it's like you want there to be loads of catastrophic terrorist attacks involving innocent people just so as you can say "I told you so".
Hmm yes, wasn't that this photo massively affected public opinion toward the war.Dilbert_X wrote:
Somewhat less impact than the Vietnam war itself - which McNamara was a key architect of - and the basic strategy of the Vietnam war.MOAB wrote:
Yeah, this photo of him had zero impact didn't it?
Doesn't really compare with shooting one guy in the head.
Since when did public opinion really matter anyway?M.O.A.B wrote:
Hmm yes, wasn't that this photo massively affected public opinion toward the war.Dilbert_X wrote:
Somewhat less impact than the Vietnam war itself - which McNamara was a key architect of - and the basic strategy of the Vietnam war.MOAB wrote:
Yeah, this photo of him had zero impact didn't it?
Doesn't really compare with shooting one guy in the head.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Well since it helped finalise Nixon's decision I'd say it did. You cannot say that this photo was not a significant point of the Vietnam war, even though many never knew the actual backstory of it.Uzique wrote:
Since when did public opinion really matter anyway?M.O.A.B wrote:
Hmm yes, wasn't that this photo massively affected public opinion toward the war.Dilbert_X wrote:
Somewhat less impact than the Vietnam war itself - which McNamara was a key architect of - and the basic strategy of the Vietnam war.
Doesn't really compare with shooting one guy in the head.
This photo, along with Nick Ut's and Hubert Van Es' have become the most famous images to come from that war and shaped a lot of opinion.
- Index »
- Community »
- Debate and Serious Talk »
- More European appeasement of radical islam