ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|6953

Well that's a bummer for the taxpayer.

US President-elect Barack Obama says he will not allow the country's car industry to collapse, but any state help must come with strict conditions.

The industry and its stakeholders would have to restructure, he told NBC television's Meet the Press.

The country's struggling carmakers have asked for a $34bn (£23bn) rescue plan.

Mr Obama also warned that the US economy would get worse before it improved, but a recovery plan with strong regulations was a top priority.

He also named Japanese-American General Eric Shinseki as Veterans' Affairs chief.

He said Gen Shinseki was exactly the right person to honour returning soldiers.

The general left his former job as US Army chief of staff after disagreeing with the then Defence Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, over the number of US troops needed to control Iraq after the invasion.
Source

https://www.thereisaway.us/images/ObamaCar-thumb.jpg
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|6953

Whoever karma'd me kindly clarify your argument. Thanks.
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6833|Global Command
Whoever the karma coward was, the way that it is a bummer for the American people is that whatever funds are to be forthcoming will be borrowed funds to be repaid at interest.
The auto maker will remain hamstrung by the unions, consumer confidence you remain shattered because deep down inside, we all know that this is a rip off.
I have always been a faithful made in America guy. I own four American vehicles and they have been great. Although my Chevy van died Friday with about 400k miles on it. But if these assholes flying in private jets with their hat in their hands help saddle my children and theirs with these debts my loyalty will be ended.
The banks have taken their bailout money and stuffed it in their vaults. None of the publics debts will be forgiven despite the trillions in interest these criminals have made before the " emergency ". This is the biggest monetary crime in the history of humanity.

So ya, if they fail, they fail. If they get a pass and don't change, then they will fail anyway and take our loot with them in bonuses.

Meanwhile, hundreds of thousands of small businesses, the real economy, are dying.
If we, the people, have no money to spend, it is game over for everybody in terms of quality of life and booming business. Now all those outsourced jobs are coming back to haunt us as millions are jobless, and most of the factories are gone.

Those who are self employed and see their business closed or becoming inoperable because of lack of capital turn to a changed country.
One where construction trades are done by illegal aliens and computer jobs are done in places like India, along with tele-marketing and software design. Most manufacturing has moved to Mexico or beyond.

In short, we are fucked.
SealXo
Member
+309|6840

ATG wrote:

Those who are self employed and see their business closed or becoming inoperable because of lack of capital




BTW - all cars* (*economical ,middle- low class ,non truck or sports cars) american cars suck, and when they get a bailout, theyll still have shit cars.


Compare a VW gti to a Focus hatchback.

Last edited by SealXo (2008-12-07 10:45:30)

Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6709|North Carolina
Fuck GM, Ford, and Chrysler.  Bankruptcy will allow them to get their shit together, or they'll die from their own incompetence.  Either way, it's not the responsibility of the feds to back them up.
Hurricane2k9
Pendulous Sweaty Balls
+1,538|6006|College Park, MD
GM needs to stop doing stupid shit like taking a Chevy truck and rebranding it as GMC. We could do away with brands like GMC (at least their non-commercial line), Buick (at least in the US), Mercury, and Pontiac and nobody would shed a tear.

Ford needs to start selling the cars they have in Europe over here. Those cars, if I'm not mistaken, are actually pretty decent. Why the hell are they giving us the short end of the automotive stick?
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/36793/marylandsig.jpg
Reciprocity
Member
+721|6885|the dank(super) side of Oregon
The government doesn't think twice about giving financials trillions of dollars after they commit knowingly irresponsible, borderline illegal practices, all under the umrella of "we're too big to fail".  but with the auto industry it's a big debate.  The only mistake Detroit made was not owning enough congressmen.

Last edited by Reciprocity (2008-12-07 12:25:11)

KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,984|6936|949

It's not the responsibility of the Feds, but bailing out the auto industry makes a lot more sense than throwing money at the financial sector.  A drop in the bucket compared to the bailout Wall Street got, and it (auto bailout) will affect common people (the workers) much more than the $700 billion financial bailout.  I do not support the government propping up unprofitable companies, but I don't think it is a given that the automakers cannot become profitable.  There are many factors at play stopping the automotive industry from being profitable, and a lot of it is incompetence at the boardroom level.

When the Feds cosigned the Chrysler loans for Lee Iococca it was kind of an eye-opener for the automotive industry and that's what I am thinking will be done here.  It is a short-term (maybe) bummer for the taxpayers, but the alternative (putting hundreds of thousands of jobs at risk in an already depressed market) I think would be far worse.
topal63
. . .
+533|7022

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

It's not the responsibility of the Feds, but bailing out the auto industry makes a lot more sense than throwing money at the financial sector.  A drop in the bucket compared to the bailout Wall Street got, and it (auto bailout) will affect common people (the workers) much more than the $700 billion financial bailout.  I do not support the government propping up unprofitable companies, but I don't think it is a given that the automakers cannot become profitable.  There are many factors at play stopping the automotive industry from being profitable, and a lot of it is incompetence at the boardroom level.

When the Feds cosigned the Chrysler loans for Lee Iococca it was kind of an eye-opener for the automotive industry and that's what I am thinking will be done here.  It is a short-term (maybe) bummer for the taxpayers, but the alternative (putting hundreds of thousands of jobs at risk in an already depressed market) I think would be far worse.
Gee, an opinion that actually makes sense.

Not only what you said... but the last thing this country needs is a larger economic leak in trade deficits (currently a well-over 7 trillion dollar cumulative savings; cash on the back end; and outta this country; leak). The political grandstanding by those piece-of-shits in congress; "lets see a show of hands," blah blah blah... it's amazing how many people were taken in by such cheap and pointless self-serving tactics.

Last edited by topal63 (2008-12-08 12:28:12)

Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6709|North Carolina

Reciprocity wrote:

The government doesn't think twice about giving financials trillions of dollars after they commit knowingly irresponsible, borderline illegal practices, all under the umrella of "we're too big to fail".  but with the auto industry it's a big debate.  The only mistake Detroit made was not owning enough congressmen.
Absolutely...  unfortunately, that's how our fucked up government works.  It's been bought and sold.
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,984|6936|949

topal63 wrote:

Not only what you said... but that last thing this country needs is a larger economic leak in trade deficits (currently a well-over 7 trillion dollar cumulative savings; cash on the back end; and outta this country; leak). The political grandstanding by those piece-of-shits in congress; "lets see a show of hands," blah blah blah... it's amazing how many people were taken in by such cheap and pointless self-serving tactics.
That's a really good point that I hadn't really pondered...it would mark another pillar of American industry shut down; another bleed of industrial/manufacturing base out of the US.  In a sense a "bailout" of the auto industry could mean the reinvestment of funds into American industrial/manufacturing base.  That would be a great concept to embrace.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6709|North Carolina

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

It's not the responsibility of the Feds, but bailing out the auto industry makes a lot more sense than throwing money at the financial sector.  A drop in the bucket compared to the bailout Wall Street got, and it (auto bailout) will affect common people (the workers) much more than the $700 billion financial bailout.  I do not support the government propping up unprofitable companies, but I don't think it is a given that the automakers cannot become profitable.  There are many factors at play stopping the automotive industry from being profitable, and a lot of it is incompetence at the boardroom level.

When the Feds cosigned the Chrysler loans for Lee Iococca it was kind of an eye-opener for the automotive industry and that's what I am thinking will be done here.  It is a short-term (maybe) bummer for the taxpayers, but the alternative (putting hundreds of thousands of jobs at risk in an already depressed market) I think would be far worse.
The market has to clear though.  If we bail them out, we're just postponing an even bigger fall.  It would make more sense to nationalize the Big 3 than to bail them out.
topal63
. . .
+533|7022

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

topal63 wrote:

Not only what you said... but the last thing this country needs is a larger economic leak in trade deficits (currently a well-over 7 trillion dollar cumulative savings; cash on the back end; and outta this country; leak). The political grandstanding by those piece-of-shits in congress; "lets see a show of hands," blah blah blah... it's amazing how many people were taken in by such cheap and pointless self-serving tactics.
That's a really good point that I hadn't really pondered...it would mark another pillar of American industry shut down; another bleed of industrial/manufacturing base out of the US.  In a sense a "bailout" of the auto industry could mean the reinvestment of funds into American industrial/manufacturing base.  That would be a great concept to embrace.
The biggest mistake to be made - would be the US loosing this market-share to Japan; and the rest.

Failing to say we back our industry; our National interests at home; is what is a mistake. A deal and a plan should be hammered out immediately. The loss of manufacturing has to stop; and now. It should not be debated. What should be debated is the comprehensiveness of the plan. Americans do not need more credit. They need more savings, money and work/labor/any-manufacturing to stay in-country.

Last edited by topal63 (2008-12-08 12:28:29)

The#1Spot
Member
+105|6844|byah
It would be better if the govt just cut the workers ( not management ) a 3 to 6 months salary check to find a new job and let the failing 3 die. Same for the suppliers that go bankrupt. Far less money used and I would think that the economy would take a far less of a dive from where its at right now.
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,984|6936|949

The#1Spot wrote:

It would be better if the govt just cut the workers ( not management ) a 3 to 6 months salary check to find a new job and let the failing 3 die. Same for the suppliers that go bankrupt. Far less money used and I would think that the economy would take a far less of a dive from where its at right now.
Pay the workers to do nothing then reintroduce them into the job market, at the same time allow manufacturing/industry pillar of the US to collapse.  Yeah, doesn't sound like too good of a plan.

Also - Obama's public works plan - a valiant idea, but how about reestablishing more industrial/manufacturing in the US instead of creating jobs out of nothing?  Why not promote industry as a continuing source of economic/national security instead of (what seems to me) a short term solution?
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6709|North Carolina

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

The#1Spot wrote:

It would be better if the govt just cut the workers ( not management ) a 3 to 6 months salary check to find a new job and let the failing 3 die. Same for the suppliers that go bankrupt. Far less money used and I would think that the economy would take a far less of a dive from where its at right now.
Pay the workers to do nothing then reintroduce them into the job market, at the same time allow manufacturing/industry pillar of the US to collapse.  Yeah, doesn't sound like too good of a plan.

Also - Obama's public works plan - a valiant idea, but how about reestablishing more industrial/manufacturing in the US instead of creating jobs out of nothing?  Why not promote industry as a continuing source of economic/national security instead of (what seems to me) a short term solution?
If the Big 3 go, then something else will take their place.  The economy is restructured all the time.  Comparative advantage favors shifting car production to other countries.
The#1Spot
Member
+105|6844|byah

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

The#1Spot wrote:

It would be better if the govt just cut the workers ( not management ) a 3 to 6 months salary check to find a new job and let the failing 3 die. Same for the suppliers that go bankrupt. Far less money used and I would think that the economy would take a far less of a dive from where its at right now.
Pay the workers to do nothing then reintroduce them into the job market, at the same time allow manufacturing/industry pillar of the US to collapse.  Yeah, doesn't sound like too good of a plan.

Also - Obama's public works plan - a valiant idea, but how about reestablishing more industrial/manufacturing in the US instead of creating jobs out of nothing?  Why not promote industry as a continuing source of economic/national security instead of (what seems to me) a short term solution?
I would rather have the money go to getting rid of illegal immigration.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6955|USA
Well all I can say is THANK GOD!!! Finally, govt. is going to "save us". Nothing like huge govt. intervention into our lives to make things better with my money and its efficiency, combined big govt, can not fail
Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6853|San Diego, CA, USA
I still say its good money chasing bad...
Catbox
forgiveness
+505|7020
GM says it will be out of money by March... even with the bailout they get...
... they are going to go bankrupt then... they can't fix their problems quick enough...
i'm not worried because Barney Fwank and peloser and reidtard are gonna make everything ok...
Love is the answer
Deadmonkiefart
Floccinaucinihilipilificator
+177|7010

SealXo wrote:

ATG wrote:

Those who are self employed and see their business closed or becoming inoperable because of lack of capital




BTW - all cars* (*economical ,middle- low class ,non truck or sports cars) american cars suck, and when they get a bailout, theyll still have shit cars.


Compare a VW gti to a Focus hatchback.
Have you looked at why American cars suck?  Americans made some of the best cars for reasonable prices until the unions gained too much power.  Now, American car companies are highly regulated/restricted by the American government and they have to pay their employees ridiculous amounts of money.  My first thought was, I do not want them bailed out, but then I realized that the government put them in this position.  Of course, now I still think I don't want them bailed out, because then the government is just going to take over, and I'm more of a free-market kinda guy.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6709|North Carolina

Deadmonkiefart wrote:

SealXo wrote:

ATG wrote:

Those who are self employed and see their business closed or becoming inoperable because of lack of capital




BTW - all cars* (*economical ,middle- low class ,non truck or sports cars) american cars suck, and when they get a bailout, theyll still have shit cars.


Compare a VW gti to a Focus hatchback.
Have you looked at why American cars suck?  Americans made some of the best cars for reasonable prices until the unions gained too much power.  Now, American car companies are highly regulated/restricted by the American government and they have to pay their employees ridiculous amounts of money.  My first thought was, I do not want them bailed out, but then I realized that the government put them in this position.  Of course, now I still think I don't want them bailed out, because then the government is just going to take over, and I'm more of a free-market kinda guy.
Unions can be blamed for a lot of things, but the design of the cars isn't related here.

American car companies rested on their laurels while the Japanese caught up with our standards and went on to pass them.  Focusing on profit margin over economies of scale didn't help much either.  SUVs might be more profitable per unit, but it makes more sense to aim for the compact and sedan markets, since they are more stable and less dependent on cheap gas.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7066

yay people will still make 35 bucks an hour for holding sheet metal under a stamp.  we are saved!


fucking idiots
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6709|North Carolina
The bailout in a nutshell...

https://i34.tinypic.com/riezhv.jpg
..teddy..jimmy
Member
+1,393|6953
Usually I'd say let the free market theory take it's toll but christ that's a load of jobs at stake.

O well, Japan will now lead the way.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard