Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6905|132 and Bush

Lockheed Martin tests “Multiple Kill Vehicle” missile fleet defense technology
August 28, 2007 The Cold War might be over, but the underlying strategy that arose with Reagan’s Star Wars missile defense program in the 1980s lives on as the threat of long-range missile attack remains a global concern. Lockheed Martin have just announced successful testing of part of the Missile Defense Agency's “Multiple Kill Vehicle” program designed to be a single-launch platform to neutralize an entire fleet of incoming enemy missiles.

https://i36.tinypic.com/2pqomf8.png

Once America had successfully developed the ability to shoot a missile out of the sky, military researchers quickly realized that a clever enemy would simply have to launch one nuclear missile together with a bunch of decoy missiles in order to fool or overwhelm the missile defense system into uselessness.

To combat this simple tactic, the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) came up with the idea of a “Multiple Kill Vehicle,” or MKV, a large rocket that could be launched at a fleet of incoming missiles in their mid-course stage of flight. Upon approaching the swarm of attacking missiles at thousands of miles per hour, a number of smaller kill vehicles would be dispatched from the MKV to identify and destroy all credible threat objects identified by an onboard sensor system.

It is thus an economical single-launch platform to counter a number of simultaneous threats approaching from the same direction – and economics is an important factor in missile defense theory; with the defense systems frequently being much more expensive to deploy than the missiles themselves, there is a theoretical possibility that the defense systems could be overcome by a wealthy opponent willing to continue launching projectiles until the cost of the defense systems overwhelmed the target country’s resources.

Lockheed Martin, in charge of the MKV development effort on behalf of the MDA, recently announced the successful testing of a key element of the MKV payload at Edwards Air Force Base's National Hover Test Facility. An extended duration demonstration of the carrier vehicle's divert and attitude control system, built by Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne, met performance objectives established by the MDA.

During an engagement with the enemy, this high-performance propulsion system maneuvers the carrier vehicle and its cargo of kill vehicles into the threat complex to intercept the targets. With tracking data from the Ballistic Missile Defense System and its own heat detecting sensor, the carrier vehicle dispenses and guides the kill vehicles to destroy targets in the complex using their own individual maneuver rockets.

The Multiple Kill Vehicle adds volume kill capability for the war fighter and is a force multiplier for all of the land- and sea-based weapons of the integrated mid-course missile defense system. In the event of an enemy launch, a single interceptor equipped with this payload destroys not only the re-entry vehicle but also all credible threat objects; including countermeasures the enemy deploys to try to spoof the defenses. This many-on-many strategy eliminates the need for extensive pre-launch intelligence while leveraging the Ballistic Missile Defense System's discrimination capability, ensuring a robust and affordable solution to emerging threats.


Dec 4, 2008. Lockheed Martin Corporation announced today that its team successfully conducted a free-flight hover test of the U.S. Missile Defense Agency's Multiple Kill Vehicle-L. Conducted Dec. 2 at the National Hover Test Facility at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., the test met all objectivesThe full-scale prototype flew at an altitude of approximately 23 feet (7 meters) for 20 seconds, maneuvering while simultaneously tracking a target. "This test demonstrated the integrated operation of the MKV-L in near-earth flight," said Rick Reginato, Multiple Kill Vehicle program director, Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company. "This represents a major step forward for the earliest operational payload designed to destroy multiple threat objects with a single missile defense interceptor."
Xbone Stormsurgezz
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7066

i like the idea, but i fear it will be cut out of the budget soon.
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6842|Long Island, New York
If I enlist, there's a very good chance I'll be working with it (if it goes into action).
SEREMAKER
BABYMAKIN EXPERT √
+2,187|6872|Mountains of NC

hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm so thats what a couple billion looks like
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/17445/carhartt.jpg
Catbox
forgiveness
+505|7020
Don't let Bawney Fwank see that....lol
Love is the answer
Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|6774
Cool concept.

Star Wars program always pretty intriguing.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
BVC
Member
+325|6999
Looks like a sweet bit of tech!
Snake
Missing, Presumed Dead
+1,046|6870|England

Warzone 2100 anybody?

One thing I dont get: if it is, indeed, to ever go operational, then the missile needs to be fired from the defence system at a speed to catch up with the enemy missile.

What if that missile is launched from, say, Cuba (or any of the Caribbean islands) and aimed at the nearest US city? Would it ever make it in time?
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6804|so randum
So can't they just throw up even more missiles to counter this?
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6905|132 and Bush

FatherTed wrote:

So can't they just throw up even more missiles to counter this?
Can't they just throw up more mkv's? ..lol. MKV's are much cheaper. I think the idea is to limit offensive capability. I don't think you will ever be able to completely eliminate a missile threat, but if you can slow it long enough while you are returning fire it's gg.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Braddock
Agitator
+916|6594|Éire

Kmarion wrote:

FatherTed wrote:

So can't they just throw up even more missiles to counter this?
Can't they just throw up more mkv's? ..lol. MKV's are much cheaper. I think the idea is to limit offensive capability. I don't think you will ever be able to completely eliminate a missile threat, but if you can slow it long enough while you are returning fire it's gg.
Can't we all just get along?






















...no!
SgtHeihn
Should have ducked
+394|6791|Ham Lake, MN (Fucking Cold)
Fucking Skynet! I was reading about this last night and then I flip over here and first thing I see is about Terminator 4 lol
blah
macaroni with cheeseeee
+111|6052|Croatia

Snake wrote:

Warzone 2100 anybody?



What if that missile is launched from, say, Cuba (or any of the Caribbean islands) and aimed at the nearest US city? Would it ever make it in time?
lol Cuba?
SEREVENT
MASSIVE G STAR
+605|6411|Birmingham, UK

blah wrote:

Snake wrote:

Warzone 2100 anybody?



What if that missile is launched from, say, Cuba (or any of the Caribbean islands) and aimed at the nearest US city? Would it ever make it in time?
lol Cuba?
The Cuban Missile Crisis...

Ever heard of it? Sure it was the Soviets that put the missiles there, but who's to say someone else won't?
Switch
Knee Deep In Clunge
+489|6767|Tyne & Wear, England
Jesus that video is like something straight out of Terminator 3, scary stuff when you think about it.

https://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k5/Murta44/Pics/TFH.jpg

Last edited by Switch (2008-12-11 12:41:46)

Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known.
Commie Killer
Member
+192|6691

Switch wrote:

Jesus that video is like something straight out of Terminator 3, scary stuff when you think about it.

http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k5/Mu … cs/TFH.jpg
To tell the truth I thought I was looking at a animation. I had no clue they had the ability to do turn down the thrusters to the point that it could hover, and also fire them so fast.
mtb0minime
minimember
+2,418|6959

Speaking of Star Wars, that thing looks like a drone. Now add some lazerzzzzzzzzz!
Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|6774

SEREVENT wrote:

blah wrote:

Snake wrote:

Warzone 2100 anybody?



What if that missile is launched from, say, Cuba (or any of the Caribbean islands) and aimed at the nearest US city? Would it ever make it in time?
lol Cuba?
The Cuban Missile Crisis...

Ever heard of it? Sure it was the Soviets that put the missiles there, but who's to say someone else won't?
I think his point is that Cuba don't have the capability nowadays, what with the Soviet bloc being long-dead... not that he lacks understanding of modern history.

I would think they're designing the system for that sorta efficacy, Snake. I mean Russia->Alaska isn't such a great distance compared to Caribbean->Southern US city, no? They'd be insane to spend all that money on a system that lacked the capability.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6905|132 and Bush

Switch wrote:

Jesus that video is like something straight out of Terminator 3, scary stuff when you think about it.

http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k5/Mu … cs/TFH.jpg

Xbone Stormsurgezz
Switch
Knee Deep In Clunge
+489|6767|Tyne & Wear, England

Kmarion wrote:

Switch wrote:

Jesus that video is like something straight out of Terminator 3, scary stuff when you think about it.

http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k5/Mu … cs/TFH.jpg

That film had better be awesome after the pile of shite that T3 was.

They could not have picked a better person for John Connor imo.  Unlike T3 which was terribly cast.
Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known.
Ridir
Semper Fi!
+48|7068

Snake wrote:

Warzone 2100 anybody?

One thing I dont get: if it is, indeed, to ever go operational, then the missile needs to be fired from the defence system at a speed to catch up with the enemy missile.

What if that missile is launched from, say, Cuba (or any of the Caribbean islands) and aimed at the nearest US city? Would it ever make it in time?
If launched from say Cuba or that region I think they would try for a skin to skin kill with a anti-air missile defense platform. It's about the only thing that makes sense. They won't make it to orbit because they don't need to, what somewhere in the range of 120 to 250 miles as opposed to 1500 to 4500 miles. I don't really know though, that's way above my head and I'm just talking out of my ass.
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6842|Long Island, New York
To whoever karma'd me: Yup, I sure will. Sarcasm failure @ you!

Switch wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

Switch wrote:

Jesus that video is like something straight out of Terminator 3, scary stuff when you think about it.

http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k5/Mu … cs/TFH.jpg

That film had better be awesome after the pile of shite that T3 was.

They could not have picked a better person for John Connor imo.  Unlike T3 which was terribly cast.
Agreed...althought Kristanna Loken was fucking .
13rin
Member
+977|6783

SEREVENT wrote:

blah wrote:

Snake wrote:

Warzone 2100 anybody?



What if that missile is launched from, say, Cuba (or any of the Caribbean islands) and aimed at the nearest US city? Would it ever make it in time?
lol Cuba?
The Cuban Missile Crisis...

Ever heard of it? Sure it was the Soviets that put the missiles there, but who's to say someone else won't?
Pretty sure McCain was there and as president he'd......  Oh wait... It doesn't matter anymore Obie's on point!  He'll get some of Bill's peopl... er um.  He'll settle it all with a 1 on 1 basketball game with Castro! CHANGE!!!!!
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
13rin
Member
+977|6783

Poseidon wrote:

To whoever karma'd me: Yup, I sure will. Sarcasm failure @ you!.
Twas me.  And I'd bet you on that kid.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6842|Long Island, New York

DBBrinson1 wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

To whoever karma'd me: Yup, I sure will. Sarcasm failure @ you!.
Twas me.  And I'd bet you on that kid.
ROFL

I love how you tried to mask your writing style. Pretty pathetic. Still butthurt over the election, huh? So called "adults" on these forums sure love to act like little children.

Considering my recruiter has someone working with ICBMs from a high school near me and who has similar grades to me, and the fact that if I enlist I'd go for missile defense/missile systems/space systems/nuclear weapons, I'd say I'd atleast be working around it or be in the same field as it.

But if you wanna try and shoot me down just because you don't like that I'm an Obama fan, that's cool. Again - really shows a lot about you.

Last edited by Poseidon (2008-12-11 20:26:43)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard