They release a new one every year, now they start rehashing their big hits.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 Revealed
gg, I now dislike your company.
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 Revealed
gg, I now dislike your company.
Just be ready for games like
Petraeus 2008
Or
Patton 1943
just like Madden.
Petraeus 2008
Or
Patton 1943
just like Madden.
Might be good
Don't be so quick to judge
I bet you guys cross to the other side of the street when you see a black guy walking your way
Don't be so quick to judge
I bet you guys cross to the other side of the street when you see a black guy walking your way
who doesn't?Hurricane2k9 wrote:
Might be good
Don't be so quick to judge
I bet you guys cross to the other side of the street when you see a black guy walking your way
and to be honest, CoD4 was a huge disappointment, so if they rush out another game to capitalize on the popularity of CoD4 it will probably be even worse, but still sell billions.
That did. It was called Cod5.Miggle wrote:
and to be honest, CoD4 was a huge disappointment, so if they rush out another game to capitalize on the popularity of CoD4 it will probably be even worse, but still sell billions.
- Superior Mind
- (not macbeth)
- +1,755|6905
What? I only cross the street if my destination is on the other side. I won't buy another CoD game after playing that horrid CoD3.Hurricane2k9 wrote:
Might be good
Don't be so quick to judge
I bet you guys cross to the other side of the street when you see a black guy walking your way
CoD4 was Spoiler (highlight to read):
good
But it was only Spoiler (highlight to read):
good because they finally went from WW2 to Modern.
Now that they have gone from WW2 to Modern to WW2 then back to Modern it seems like they can't make up their minds.
But whats really happening is them trying to find out which war makes more money.
good
But it was only Spoiler (highlight to read):
good because they finally went from WW2 to Modern.
Now that they have gone from WW2 to Modern to WW2 then back to Modern it seems like they can't make up their minds.
But whats really happening is them trying to find out which war makes more money.
CoD4 was pretty good thoughSuperior Mind wrote:
What? I only cross the street if my destination is on the other side. I won't buy another CoD game after playing that horrid CoD3.Hurricane2k9 wrote:
Might be good
Don't be so quick to judge
I bet you guys cross to the other side of the street when you see a black guy walking your way
I mean cmon guys. This could be to CoD4 what BF2 was to Desert Combat. Desert Combat was modern war, as was BF2... but BF2 executed it even better.
Superior Mind wrote:
What? I only cross the street if my destination is on the other side. I won't buy another CoD game after playing that horrid CoD3.Hurricane2k9 wrote:
Might be good
Don't be so quick to judge
I bet you guys cross to the other side of the street when you see a black guy walking your way
Ever heard of treyarch?TheAussieReaper wrote:
That did. It was called Cod5.Miggle wrote:
and to be honest, CoD4 was a huge disappointment, so if they rush out another game to capitalize on the popularity of CoD4 it will probably be even worse, but still sell billions.
Yes.Miggle wrote:
Ever heard of treyarch?TheAussieReaper wrote:
That did. It was called Cod5.Miggle wrote:
and to be honest, CoD4 was a huge disappointment, so if they rush out another game to capitalize on the popularity of CoD4 it will probably be even worse, but still sell billions.
They were the guys who decided to
Miggle wrote:
rush out another game to capitalize on the popularity of CoD4 it will probably be even worse, but still sell billions.
afaik they were working on it while cod4 was being worked on, but yeah, it's success was entirely due to cod4.TheAussieReaper wrote:
Yes.Miggle wrote:
Ever heard of treyarch?TheAussieReaper wrote:
That did. It was called Cod5.
They were the guys who decided toMiggle wrote:
rush out another game to capitalize on the popularity of CoD4 it will probably be even worse, but still sell billions.
Miggle wrote:
afaik they were working on it while cod4 was being worked on, but yeah, it's success was entirely due to cod4.TheAussieReaper wrote:
Yes.Miggle wrote:
Ever heard of treyarch?
They were the guys who decided toMiggle wrote:
rush out another game to capitalize on the popularity of CoD4 it will probably be even worse, but still sell billions.
http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/callo … id=6198170GS: After Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare made the leap to modern combat, it was somewhat of a surprise to learn that you were taking the franchise back to the World War II setting. What was your inspiration for this blast-from-the-past decision?
CS: Treyarch actually starting [working on] Call of Duty: World at War a year before Modern Warfare hit the shelves. I doubt that many people would have been very surprised back then, since all the titles in the COD series up to that point were set in WWII. So we set out to create the best of that genre. As surprises go, I think you will like this one.
sorry. i just have to poke in. they worked on it "a year before MW hit the shelves." not a year before development of MW started. development of MW was probably already a year ahead of them.firebolt5 wrote:
Miggle wrote:
afaik they were working on it while cod4 was being worked on, but yeah, it's success was entirely due to cod4.TheAussieReaper wrote:
Yes.Miggle wrote:
Ever heard of treyarch?
They were the guys who decided tohttp://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/callo … id=6198170GS: After Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare made the leap to modern combat, it was somewhat of a surprise to learn that you were taking the franchise back to the World War II setting. What was your inspiration for this blast-from-the-past decision?
CS: Treyarch actually starting [working on] Call of Duty: World at War a year before Modern Warfare hit the shelves. I doubt that many people would have been very surprised back then, since all the titles in the COD series up to that point were set in WWII. So we set out to create the best of that genre. As surprises go, I think you will like this one.
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
yeah... and?haffeysucks wrote:
sorry. i just have to poke in. they worked on it "a year before MW hit the shelves." not a year before development of MW started. development of MW was probably already a year ahead of them.firebolt5 wrote:
Miggle wrote:
afaik they were working on it while cod4 was being worked on, but yeah, it's success was entirely due to cod4.http://www.gamespot.com/pc/action/callo … id=6198170GS: After Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare made the leap to modern combat, it was somewhat of a surprise to learn that you were taking the franchise back to the World War II setting. What was your inspiration for this blast-from-the-past decision?
CS: Treyarch actually starting [working on] Call of Duty: World at War a year before Modern Warfare hit the shelves. I doubt that many people would have been very surprised back then, since all the titles in the COD series up to that point were set in WWII. So we set out to create the best of that genre. As surprises go, I think you will like this one.
I think the point trying to be reached hear is that MW is the prime factor in W@W's success.
as I said...Stimey wrote:
I think the point trying to be reached hear is that MW is the prime factor in W@W's success.
I enjoyed CoD4's SP, but I never got into the MP.
Maybe it'll change this time around.
I'll reserve judgement until I actually see screenshots/a trailer though.
Maybe it'll change this time around.
I'll reserve judgement until I actually see screenshots/a trailer though.
however, I'm not expecting much.Poseidon wrote:
I enjoyed CoD4's SP, but I never got into the MP.
Maybe it'll change this time around.
I'll reserve final judgement until I actually see screenshots/a trailer though. play the game
Heres exactly how the game will be:
It will be Call of Duty 4 with an optimized engine.
It will have new maps; but the favorites will be rehashes of old maps.
It will have new guns; but everyone will use the guns that were good in CoD4.
It will have new perks; but everyone will still use 3x Nade, Juggernaut, and Martyr.
New Campaign, but no one I know played CoD4 just for the campaign.
Also: Nades will still be over powered.
Campaign will not have the same awe factor as CoD4, i.e. the YOU GOT HIT BY A NUKE AND YOU ARE DYING level.
It will be Call of Duty 4 with an optimized engine.
It will have new maps; but the favorites will be rehashes of old maps.
It will have new guns; but everyone will use the guns that were good in CoD4.
It will have new perks; but everyone will still use 3x Nade, Juggernaut, and Martyr.
New Campaign, but no one I know played CoD4 just for the campaign.
Also: Nades will still be over powered.
Campaign will not have the same awe factor as CoD4, i.e. the YOU GOT HIT BY A NUKE AND YOU ARE DYING level.
Last edited by Stimey (2008-12-03 19:25:13)
Yes, that's why I didn't say "final".
Which is why WaW was based of the same game engine that had already been built for MW.haffeysucks wrote:
sorry. i just have to poke in. they worked on it "a year before MW hit the shelves." not a year before development of MW started. development of MW was probably already a year ahead of them.
TheAussieReaper wrote:
Which is why WaW was based of the same game engine that had already been built for MW. quake 3haffeysucks wrote:
sorry. i just have to poke in. they worked on it "a year before MW hit the shelves." not a year before development of MW started. development of MW was probably already a year ahead of them.
why are we surprised to see a call of duty 6 in production? did anyone think it wouldn't happen?
It'll be out by fall...S.Lythberg wrote:
why are we surprised to see a call of duty 6 in production? did anyone think it wouldn't happen?
CoD4 was out in the fallMiggle wrote:
It'll be out by fall...S.Lythberg wrote:
why are we surprised to see a call of duty 6 in production? did anyone think it wouldn't happen?
CoD5 was out in the fall
and...
CoD6 will be out in the fall!
omg