So what you're saying is Iran could legitimately invade Israel given that there has been years of fruitless resolutions against them? ...and yet the US continually cites Iran's threatening posture towards Israel as a reason for the world to be annoyed at them, mmmm.lowing wrote:
Um I think the consistency is there, it took over 10 years of bullshit UN resolution bombardment until the US said fuck it, the US tried diplomacy and is not given credit for it. It is rediculous and down right stupid to think that only one more UN resolution was needed to get Iraq to comply.Braddock wrote:
And yet Iran have to satisfy their every inquiry? Good consistency there lowing. And by the way, the UN are not based in New York, there HQ is on International soil... it is not considered property of the US.lowing wrote:
It might appear that way and I can definately see your point. However if you think I am going to support the US having to answer to, and get permission from the UN for all of its affairs, I will not. IF the UN does not like it, then they are free to excuse themselves from the state of NY and move on down the road. The US does not need them.
I beleive the UN did nothing but stall for as long as possible to keep the money flowing into and out of Iraq by the UN members.
Tell ya what, the UN is free to move their sorry asses to any other country they choose. Do not give that "technically" bullshit.
The US has embassies in other countries and the UN is in the US. You can call the soil it sits on whatever you like.
And I'm afraid you're wrong lowing, the UN HQ stands on International soil and is surrounded by US soil I'm afraid!