So honestly. Who here believes that there's a possibility that Iran might one day decide to nuke a European country? Or any country for that matter?
ƒ³
cuz they threatened to wipe a country off the map already???????? duroug wrote:
So honestly. Who here believes that there's a possibility that Iran might one day decide to nuke a European country? Or any country for that matter?
They haven't said that. Read the proper translation.cuz they threatened to wipe a country off the map already????????
lulzDilbert_X wrote:
They haven't said that. Read the proper translation.cuz they threatened to wipe a country off the map already????????
Take a look at the Cold War, about 40 years worth of possibility there.oug wrote:
So honestly. Who here believes that there's a possibility that Iran might one day decide to nuke a European country? Or any country for that matter?
So your missiles must be made by Revell if you say the are better than Iranian's.Braddock wrote:
They have about as much reason to hit us with missiles as we have to hit them... and ours are waaaaaay better.
/thread.
UK?rammunition wrote:
with the help of Russian military technology Iran can now defend itself from oversea's terrorists who want to attack them
That same argument applies to the US- Common and/or external enemy to take away from domestic failings. The US and Iran feed off each other's rhetoric.S.Lythberg wrote:
My thoughts exactly, this kind of thinking dominates the middle east, they need an external foe to distract the people from their own crippling failure as a government.Kmarion wrote:
They are getting desperate. The Bush attack hasn't happened and he's almost out. That's bad news for leaders of Iran. They need a great Satan to explain away all of their own failings. If Obama dispels the notion of a common enemy they are up shit creek. The future looks bright from where I standing.
The missile malfunctioned in flight didn't it?
And we're all too happy to fill that role.
The problem is, without a unifying enemy, will the middle east degrade into an African style anarchy, I believe so, they have a similar tribal and religious mentality, but have been to occupied hating the west to resume hating each other.
But when they threaten their neighbors? Wonder what would happen if Iran threatens Saudi Arabia? Or because Iran has a nuke other countries that have the money (and they do), want nukes too - welcome to Nuclear Proliferation.Dilbert_X wrote:
Everyone should be bothered when a crime is committed.USM wrote:
why would anyone in ireland be bothered about the coalition being in iraq?
Iran having nukes and missiles is not a crime.
You saying it's a crime doesn't make it one.Dilbert_X wrote:
Everyone should be bothered when a crime is committed.USM wrote:
why would anyone in ireland be bothered about the coalition being in iraq?
Iran having nukes and missiles is not a crime.
Last edited by FEOS (2008-11-13 19:02:42)
Those AA batties from Russia didn't help Syria against Israel. From the account the Israeli Electronic Countermeasures pretty much rendered the Russian technology useless.rammunition wrote:
with the help of Russian military technology Iran can now defend itself from oversea's terrorists who want to attack them
Thats their neighbours problem.But when they threaten their neighbors?
Why would they do that?Wonder what would happen if Iran threatens Saudi Arabia?
Perhaps you should look at what other countries in the ME think about Iran's activities. They're more worried than anyone else and are lobbying the EU and US hard to put a stop to what Iran's doing. That and working on their own arms to counter what Iran is doing.Dilbert_X wrote:
Thats their neighbours problem.But when they threaten their neighbors?Why would they do that?Wonder what would happen if Iran threatens Saudi Arabia?
Its the US who is running around the ME threatening and bombing everyone.
If the US hadn't been meddling with the ME and Iran particularly for the last half century I very much doubt we would be in this situation now.
America/Israel you retardusmarine wrote:
UK?rammunition wrote:
with the help of Russian military technology Iran can now defend itself from oversea's terrorists who want to attack them
Great, so leave them to it.FEOS wrote:
Perhaps you should look at what other countries in the ME think about Iran's activities. They're more worried than anyone else and are lobbying the EU and US hard to put a stop to what Iran's doing. That and working on their own arms to counter what Iran is doing.
...or Hiroshima or Nagasaki... even when they're full of innocent civilians and the Japanese army are no longer a threat.Warhammer wrote:
Any nuke from a threatening nation is an issue. If you use one nuke right you can take out the US...
UK said a nuke iran was unacceptable. and UK has been eveywhere the US has recently.rammunition wrote:
America/Israel you retardusmarine wrote:
UK?rammunition wrote:
with the help of Russian military technology Iran can now defend itself from oversea's terrorists who want to attack them
its not the UK that wants to "annihilate" Iran.usmarine wrote:
UK said a nuke iran was unacceptable. and UK has been eveywhere the US has recently.rammunition wrote:
America/Israel you retardusmarine wrote:
UK?
so again......... UK retard?
lol...that has little to do with anything. good job reverting back to that same old line. Bwap! Bwap! Bwap! want a cracker?rammunition wrote:
and remind me what country if the only nation to use nukes????
so you don't like facts???usmarine wrote:
lol...that has little to do with anything. good job reverting back to that same old line. Bwap! Bwap! Bwap! want a cracker?rammunition wrote:
and remind me what country if the only nation to use nukes????