Amen To That !
what unit you inThe Bartenders Son wrote:
As an American and serving in the U.S Army I say Bring it on!
100% Grade A American! Born in The US of A
So just to clarify, you'd be prepared to fight and die to protect a war criminal in the theoretical situation that Bush got found guilty of breaking human and chemical weapons treaties?
Let me ask you somthing, Where were you when 911 hit??????????? where .... huh? REMEMBER THAT!!!!
Lets Clarify what your trying to ask... I AM PREPARED, and I HAVE PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS! ANY EVERY OTHER @#$@#$@ AMERICAN THAT POST STUPID @#$@ LIKE THIS!
LIKE I SAID.... BRING IT!
i was at a .50 cal range on september 11th, 2001. They locked it down when it happened then we got sent to our CP and everyone was locked down.
Last edited by GunSlinger OIF II (2006-03-09 00:29:56)
Im in D 3-43 ADA
... so true.. but we have a dumb enough pres to have one finger on the red button and one up his tush; so be careful.cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
dont fuck w/ USA... Norad has tons of nukes... If US feels like to... they can invade the whole of europe, and england is the USA's bitch so they'll help the US... oh dont forget the B2 bombers , if u hear it, ur dead. if u dont, pray that it wont come over to ur house
where at?
Ft. Bliss TX right now....
hey my old unit was moved to ft bliss when we got back...2-7 cav
YA all of the CAV is coming back very sooon man.. we are building house's and stuff 4 you guys
LOL bro I would normally stay out of such an out of space thread but I have to reply to this one.jord wrote:
America would probobly win because the european countries would wait for an enemy country to be weakened and attack them e.g:england would attack france but if europe worked together then it would be close.Bring china into this and america would easily lose.
CHINA bring China in would do say nothing, outside of maybe adding more ground troops to there side. Europe would have to give them some training on URBAN war because they would be clueless. IF and only IF Eurpoe could trust them long enough to try and pull this off. China would turn on them, no question.
People like it or not the US in still in power and always, YES always will be. We have to many power hungry people to let anything less happen. Even with 2 counties teaming up the US wins hands down. It would take just a simple thought of an attack happening on American land and all troops would be home like that. Then if this was to become a harsh reality evey and I do mean evey male American would be standing ready to fight.
Hmm. I hadn't considered that. Maybe we would lose...those Swedish chicks are pretty hot, so I know I'd fall for it.I.8.u.2 wrote:
EU against USA...
The most obvious first move should be to send a couple of 1000 Swedish babes to the US.
The should then f"ck your brains out, it should not take long, just a couple of month..
And when your dicks and brains has finally recovered it should be all over.
Wow, After reading the first 4 pages of this thread, I got bored and just skipped to the end.
In an unlikely war with the US vs Europe/Russia, it would be interesting to say the least. The last resort attack would be both sides using not just any nukes, but their Hydrogen Thermonuclear Bombs.
If it were to come down to "conventional" warfare, the U.S. can be very self-sufficient and let's not forget, "The Right To Bare Arms". A very big majority of the U.S. population own firearms of some sort. From Hunting Rifles to shotguns to pistols. Some even have military firearms in personal possession. So, technically, any ground attack against the U.S. would face not only the Military, but also civilian aspect.
For a good idea on how we’d fight, check out the movie “Red Dawn”. The US citizens would fight like we did during the Revolutionary War; we’d use guerilla warfare tactics, and would have the advantage of knowing the lands layout along with the U.S. Military.
And let use not forget that the U.S Military may have even stronger aircraft and weapons in production or in prototype that the world doesn’t even know of. Call me a dreamer, but I do believe that Area 51 does exist and that we may have the next generation (black) aircraft sitting out there. One of them, the switchblade (a.k.a. Bird of Prey) is rumored to replace the F-111. It’s rumored to be a MACH 3 fighter-bomber. Never discount the rumor mill sites because they let us know about the stealth aircrafts before the government ever acknowledged their existence.
Even if Europe/Russia were to win in this scenario, it would be with catastrophic loses of both life and machinery. Which would then be the perfect time for North Korea or some other country to try to become the next world dominating power because there would very little left of Europe/Russia’s forces to stand up to them.
But, like said earlier, the original post is of something that I’d highly doubt would ever happen, or at least not in our lifetime.
In an unlikely war with the US vs Europe/Russia, it would be interesting to say the least. The last resort attack would be both sides using not just any nukes, but their Hydrogen Thermonuclear Bombs.
If it were to come down to "conventional" warfare, the U.S. can be very self-sufficient and let's not forget, "The Right To Bare Arms". A very big majority of the U.S. population own firearms of some sort. From Hunting Rifles to shotguns to pistols. Some even have military firearms in personal possession. So, technically, any ground attack against the U.S. would face not only the Military, but also civilian aspect.
For a good idea on how we’d fight, check out the movie “Red Dawn”. The US citizens would fight like we did during the Revolutionary War; we’d use guerilla warfare tactics, and would have the advantage of knowing the lands layout along with the U.S. Military.
And let use not forget that the U.S Military may have even stronger aircraft and weapons in production or in prototype that the world doesn’t even know of. Call me a dreamer, but I do believe that Area 51 does exist and that we may have the next generation (black) aircraft sitting out there. One of them, the switchblade (a.k.a. Bird of Prey) is rumored to replace the F-111. It’s rumored to be a MACH 3 fighter-bomber. Never discount the rumor mill sites because they let us know about the stealth aircrafts before the government ever acknowledged their existence.
Even if Europe/Russia were to win in this scenario, it would be with catastrophic loses of both life and machinery. Which would then be the perfect time for North Korea or some other country to try to become the next world dominating power because there would very little left of Europe/Russia’s forces to stand up to them.
But, like said earlier, the original post is of something that I’d highly doubt would ever happen, or at least not in our lifetime.
Have you heard of the Abram M1A1????? Apache????? F-15????? B2 Stealth Bomber????? We have technology that makes our soldiers better then what is natural. The last major war, Britian (and the rest of Europe) could not even defeat their enemy and had to have help from us.elite wrote:
britian has best trained pilots in the world, best fighter planes (eurofighter), europe has best tanks (challenger 2, leapord tank), a huge navy britain has 3 aircraft carrier then germany etc, britian has best trained soldiers in the world and the most advanced choppers ever built.
Edit: Also, if the US dropped out of the UN, it would break apart. Have you all heard of League of Nations??? It fell about because the US did not join. We support a majority of the UN's finances.
Last edited by dubbs (2006-03-10 21:59:53)
if you have to be sooooo patriotic then maybe you should go and argue with some one who have the same opinions as you, and by the waydubbs wrote:
Have you heard of the Abram M1A1????? Apache????? F-15????? B2 Stealth Bomber????? We have technology that makes our soldiers better then what is natural. The last major war, Britian (and the rest of Europe) could not even defeat their enemy and had to have help from us.elite wrote:
britian has best trained pilots in the world, best fighter planes (eurofighter), europe has best tanks (challenger 2, leapord tank), a huge navy britain has 3 aircraft carrier then germany etc, britian has best trained soldiers in the world and the most advanced choppers ever built.
Edit: Also, if the US dropped out of the UN, it would break apart. Have you all heard of League of Nations??? It fell about because the US did not join. We support a majority of the UN's finances.
ever heard of challenger 2 the leopard 2 and the leclerc.
tiger attack helicopter and the mangusta ka-50 black shark.
the eurofighter-typhoon. jas-gripen, tornado
if not do your look into it you will soon find out that the US doesnt have superior equipment
just superior results then???herrr_smity wrote:
if you have to be sooooo patriotic then maybe you should go and argue with some one who have the same opinions as you, and by the waydubbs wrote:
Have you heard of the Abram M1A1????? Apache????? F-15????? B2 Stealth Bomber????? We have technology that makes our soldiers better then what is natural. The last major war, Britian (and the rest of Europe) could not even defeat their enemy and had to have help from us.elite wrote:
britian has best trained pilots in the world, best fighter planes (eurofighter), europe has best tanks (challenger 2, leapord tank), a huge navy britain has 3 aircraft carrier then germany etc, britian has best trained soldiers in the world and the most advanced choppers ever built.
Edit: Also, if the US dropped out of the UN, it would break apart. Have you all heard of League of Nations??? It fell about because the US did not join. We support a majority of the UN's finances.
ever heard of challenger 2 the leopard 2 and the leclerc.
tiger attack helicopter and the mangusta ka-50 black shark.
the eurofighter-typhoon. jas-gripen, tornado
if not do your look into it you will soon find out that the US doesnt have superior equipment
<quote>"if you have to be sooooo patriotic then maybe you should go and argue with some one who have the same opinions as you."
LMAO............kinda pointless to argue with someone that agrees with me.........but hey.........whatever ya say.
superior results because the united stats has a ability to attack small shit country's.
not other industrialized countries
not other industrialized countries
the other industrial countries have allot to gain by maintaining peace, also allot to loose by going to war, the same as us.....The real threats are these little "small shit" countries that are full of insane radicals who have nothing to loose.......Nobody is worried China is going to drop a bomb on anybodyherrr_smity wrote:
superior results because the united stats has a ability to attack small shit country's.
not other industrialized countries
mosquitoes kill more people than lions
Last edited by lowing (2006-03-11 12:42:17)
But dude! What isn't " a small shit country " compared to the USA Militarily ?herrr_smity wrote:
superior results because the united stats has a ability to attack small shit country's.
not other industrialized countries
ChinaHorseman 77 wrote:
But dude! What isn't " a small shit country " compared to the USA Militarily ?herrr_smity wrote:
superior results because the united stats has a ability to attack small shit country's.
not other industrialized countries
Britain
Germany
France
India
i wouldnt put france or germany in that equation
Ummmmm, the US is allies with the largest armies in Europe. e.g. the UK, etc... You think the United Armies of Bulgaria could make a dent in our country? I'm not exactly sure how the US has gone too far by fighting against terror. But if Europe wanted to take us on, then I would join the Marines and kill some pathetic french people. Stupid post....
snickerherrr_smity wrote:
ChinaHorseman 77 wrote:
But dude! What isn't " a small shit country " compared to the USA Militarily ?herrr_smity wrote:
superior results because the united stats has a ability to attack small shit country's.
not other industrialized countries
Britain
Germany
France
India
Sorry I read the first few pages and skipped ahead. There a few things preventing this. The first and foremost is economic grounds. Unless something extremely drastic happened it would not happen because the world economy depends on the US. Not entirely but a good part of it.
Second, if the US was invaded it wouldn't be just the current army you would be facing. You can bet your ass every abled bodied person in the US would strape on a rifle and start getting busy. Now your facing the biggest army in the world... Yes alot wouldn't be trained but I'll tell you this, what we would lack in training we would more than make up for in conviction...Suicide bombers my ass...you can bet we would pull out all the stops...
We wouldn't nuke because it would be on our own ground. As far as allies go I would count england, Canada, japan (because they own half of the US anyway), Canada, and possible China. The reason I say China is because I'm sure the US would make heavy trade offers to them in exchange for help. China is a fast growing child and the fall of the US would drastically stunt its growth.
Second, if the US was invaded it wouldn't be just the current army you would be facing. You can bet your ass every abled bodied person in the US would strape on a rifle and start getting busy. Now your facing the biggest army in the world... Yes alot wouldn't be trained but I'll tell you this, what we would lack in training we would more than make up for in conviction...Suicide bombers my ass...you can bet we would pull out all the stops...
We wouldn't nuke because it would be on our own ground. As far as allies go I would count england, Canada, japan (because they own half of the US anyway), Canada, and possible China. The reason I say China is because I'm sure the US would make heavy trade offers to them in exchange for help. China is a fast growing child and the fall of the US would drastically stunt its growth.
you seem to forget the fact that it wold be in china's "best interest" that the US were to fall, that wold leave them i control much like the US after the second world war.sfg-Ice__ wrote:
Sorry I read the first few pages and skipped ahead. There a few things preventing this. The first and foremost is economic grounds. Unless something extremely drastic happened it would not happen because the world economy depends on the US. Not entirely but a good part of it.
Second, if the US was invaded it wouldn't be just the current army you would be facing. You can bet your ass every abled bodied person in the US would strape on a rifle and start getting busy. Now your facing the biggest army in the world... Yes alot wouldn't be trained but I'll tell you this, what we would lack in training we would more than make up for in conviction...Suicide bombers my ass...you can bet we would pull out all the stops...
We wouldn't nuke because it would be on our own ground. As far as allies go I would count england, Canada, japan (because they own half of the US anyway), Canada, and possible China. The reason I say China is because I'm sure the US would make heavy trade offers to them in exchange for help. China is a fast growing child and the fall of the US would drastically stunt its growth.
China has a HUGE trade surplus with the US. It is in their interest for the US economy to remain strong...hell, their currency was entirely pegged to ours until recently. After much pressure by the US and other countries, it is now pegged to a basket of currencies, but still the Dollar is the one that matters most to it. Nope, it is NOT in their best interests for the US to 'fall', and they know it.herrr_smity wrote:
you seem to forget the fact that it wold be in china's "best interest" that the US were to fall, that wold leave them i control much like the US after the second world war.