oh gee. because i wont talk about the same fucking thing that has been discussed for three years now? shut up.destruktion_6143 wrote:
ive also determined that USmarine doesnt know how to debate lol
according to u im a retard... u expected me to know this? do it for me while i drool and shit myself. kthnxbyeGod Save the Queen wrote:
search the forums tarddestruktion_6143 wrote:
source? and nice, u called me a retard. congrats.God Save the Queen wrote:
Im laughing at the retard who is still using the 655000 number, two years after the survey was already shown to be full of shit.
I guess people stopped dying in 2006.
fucking retard.
dude, if u would at least talk in a respectful manner, then i would shut up. I shouldve known better.usmarine wrote:
oh gee. because i wont talk about the same fucking thing that has been discussed for three years now? shut up.destruktion_6143 wrote:
ive also determined that USmarine doesnt know how to debate lol
you know how to google. or are you that much of a tard that you couldnt figure that?
no i wont. not when you post the same dumb fuck numbers as people have been doing.destruktion_6143 wrote:
dude, if u would at least talk in a respectful manner, then i would shut up. I shouldve known better.
tards usually dontdestruktion_6143 wrote:
I shouldve known better.
you didnt exactly prove me wrong though. so u arent successful at debating my point.usmarine wrote:
no i wont. not when you post the same dumb fuck numbers as people have been doing.destruktion_6143 wrote:
dude, if u would at least talk in a respectful manner, then i would shut up. I shouldve known better.
Yeah I know that the number is hugely inflated. I've read a fair bit about it and what the figures really resemble. But just googling debunking onto it, you'll find most commentary saying it wasn't the US who are responsible.Kmarion wrote:
No it's not. Example:TheAussieReaper wrote:
That "debunking" is just arguing that the deaths were not caused directly from Americans.Kmarion wrote:
Your whole argument relies on a random google search. Watch what one word can do.You miss my point though.The man responsible for compiling some of the Lancet study is the very same propagandist employed by Sadam Hussein to claim that U.N. was killing innocent Iraqi children when sanctions were imposed after the 1990 liberation of Kuwait.
It was a full of shit estimate in all respects though.
ok fine.destruktion_6143 wrote:
you didnt exactly prove me wrong though. so u arent successful at debating my point.
"this topic has previously been discussed. search."
/win
why are you the way u are? everytime i try to do something fun, you make it..not..that way. i hate SO much about what you choose to be...God Save the Queen wrote:
tards usually dontdestruktion_6143 wrote:
I shouldve known better.
/lose. thats all it took. was it that hard? im just tired of all the hating.usmarine wrote:
ok fine.destruktion_6143 wrote:
you didnt exactly prove me wrong though. so u arent successful at debating my point.
"this topic has previously been discussed. search."
/win
talking about a shitwad number about iraqis that arent dead is fun? weird
its a rough world young man.destruktion_6143 wrote:
im just tired of all the hating.
Debunked isn't a word the mainstream media likes to use. I was making a simple point. If I was going to go in depth I would point to the numerous other studies (from varying nations) that have the death toll much lower. But tbh I figured most of us had already figured it out..lol.TheAussieReaper wrote:
Yeah I know that the number is hugely inflated. I've read a fair bit about it and what the figures really resemble. But just googling debunking onto it, you'll find most commentary saying it wasn't the US who are responsible.Kmarion wrote:
No it's not. Example:TheAussieReaper wrote:
That "debunking" is just arguing that the deaths were not caused directly from Americans.You miss my point though.The man responsible for compiling some of the Lancet study is the very same propagandist employed by Sadam Hussein to claim that U.N. was killing innocent Iraqi children when sanctions were imposed after the 1990 liberation of Kuwait.
It was a full of shit estimate in all respects though.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
i enjoy debating. so yes. it doesnt matter if im right about that fact or not, thats why its called debating.God Save the Queen wrote:
talking about a shitwad number about iraqis that arent dead is fun? weird
All but one of us I think,Kmarion wrote:
Debunked isn't a word the mainstream media likes to use. I was making a simple point. If I was going to go in depth I would point to the numerous other studies (from varying nations) that have the death toll much lower. But tbh I figured most of us had already figured it out..lol.
i dont think a concrete number will ever exist though.Kmarion wrote:
Debunked isn't a word the mainstream media likes to use. I was making a simple point. If I was going to go in depth I would point to the numerous other studies (from varying nations) that have the death toll much lower. But tbh I figured most of us had already figured it out..lol.TheAussieReaper wrote:
Yeah I know that the number is hugely inflated. I've read a fair bit about it and what the figures really resemble. But just googling debunking onto it, you'll find most commentary saying it wasn't the US who are responsible.Kmarion wrote:
No it's not. Example:
You miss my point though.
It was a full of shit estimate in all respects though.
i resent thatTheAussieReaper wrote:
All but one of us I think,Kmarion wrote:
Debunked isn't a word the mainstream media likes to use. I was making a simple point. If I was going to go in depth I would point to the numerous other studies (from varying nations) that have the death toll much lower. But tbh I figured most of us had already figured it out..lol.
Last edited by destruktion_6143 (2008-10-30 22:58:11)
You are one of the best trolls on the net.destruktion_6143 wrote:
i enjoy debating. so yes. it doesnt matter if im right about that fact or not, thats why its called debating.God Save the Queen wrote:
talking about a shitwad number about iraqis that arent dead is fun? weird
god save the queen is a very good troll indeed.NateWiese wrote:
You are one of the best trolls on the net.destruktion_6143 wrote:
i enjoy debating. so yes. it doesnt matter if im right about that fact or not, thats why its called debating.God Save the Queen wrote:
talking about a shitwad number about iraqis that arent dead is fun? weird