MrAnderson
Ghost Town T90/Apache Whore
+99|6000|Aberdeen, Scotland
Wasn't attacking you, I was attacking the POS that is CoD4 multiplayer, which so many people rave about
Mint Sauce
Frighteningly average
+780|6287|eng

MrAnderson wrote:

Wasn't attacking you, I was attacking the POS that is CoD4 multiplayer, which so many people rave about
Meh, I don't think it's shit. Take time to learn about it and get into it properly and it's pretty good, still not as good as BF2 though.

It's also more popular than BF2. #_#
#rekt
MrAnderson
Ghost Town T90/Apache Whore
+99|6000|Aberdeen, Scotland
Yeah, it's not shit really, I just got bored of it quickly

It has to be more popular being a newer game too...
Mint Sauce
Frighteningly average
+780|6287|eng

MrAnderson wrote:

Yeah, it's not shit really, I just got bored of it quickly

It has to be more popular being a newer game too...
On PS3 alone, there are over 3 million accounts. Not even 1 million on BF2.
#rekt
Icleos
Member
+101|6743

Mint Sauce wrote:

MrAnderson wrote:

Yeah, it's not shit really, I just got bored of it quickly

It has to be more popular being a newer game too...
On PS3 alone, there are over 3 million accounts. Not even 1 million on BF2.
BF2 on the console is a very different game compared to the PC.

It's shit.  Almost as bad a fuel for war...  And that game was a crap in a nice looking box.

Last edited by Icleos (2008-10-21 10:46:30)

H3RB4L ABU53
+45|5868|123 | 456 | 789 | Δ
I've always hated COD4 I bought it because of all the hype, played single player for a few missions and thought yea it's good, but I hate single player against bots who pretend to not know where you are, multiplayer is the ONLY way to play any game in my opinion, so I went into MP and was shocked at grenade spams, puny levels, and the speed of the whole game is just unrealistic, and when I see the choppers it just frustrates me that I can't get in 1, let alone a jet. Everything, apart from the graphics, makes me want to play BF2- COD4= sniper rifles are pointless, no vehicles (apart from the stupid choppers that the player racks up kills for but doesn't have to do anything), controls are stupid because you move around fast and arcadey, and then when you want to go prone you can't because it's blocked it's so random I haven't got time to figure out if my prone is going to be blocked or not with all the bullets flying through the walls, I think that if you want a run and gunner like COD4, then you might as well play UT3, UT3 has pretty much the same speed controls, more game modes, more gore, good weapons, better graphics, bigger and better maps, better mods, vehicles etc... And BF2 IMO is better than all because the maps are huge, vehicles to suit all tastes, good weapon set and there is a good learning curve (bullet drop, different guns and vehicles etc) that isn't in many games (and you don't rank up every second like COD), and because of the big maps, 64 player servers, vehicles, and noobs and pros, so much random stuff happens in every game that it's always funny and obviously it's not always a joke you can play the game how you like and work with your team/squad or on your own you can do what you like, that's why I like BF2 and I will probably play it until I get bored of games because I know full well that it won't be beat by any other shooter (in my opinion), even with some of the glitches and that, when you get used to it it just becomes a part of the game and for some reason I think it makes it better lol it sort of adds a "BF" style. I think the reason that COD4 is so popular is because a lot of my mates have got it and just have a quick go when they get in from work, and they're not even gamers it's just an easy game to pick up and play for a laugh, but maybe people just haven't got the patience for BF2 as it has a much longer learning curve, but if they did have the time and patience I think BF2 would be the most popular game, don't see why not, the ONLY slightly bad thing to me about BF is the graphics but they don't even look bad they look neat- I like Battlefield 2
H3RB4L ABU53
+45|5868|123 | 456 | 789 | Δ
I used to like BF:MC on the 360 but it's so nooby I could get about 20/30 chopper snipes in 1 round and when you're in a chopper its so easy you can get about 100 kills in 5 minutes, and no jets, less weapons, worse maps, dodgy servers and it's xbox live full of pricks
User007Gamer
???
+21|5983|Dubai, UAE

H3RB4L ABU53 wrote:

I've always hated COD4 I bought it because of all the hype, played single player for a few missions and thought yea it's good, but I hate single player against bots who pretend to not know where you are, multiplayer is the ONLY way to play any game in my opinion, so I went into MP and was shocked at grenade spams, puny levels, and the speed of the whole game is just unrealistic, and when I see the choppers it just frustrates me that I can't get in 1, let alone a jet. Everything, apart from the graphics, makes me want to play BF2- COD4= sniper rifles are pointless, no vehicles (apart from the stupid choppers that the player racks up kills for but doesn't have to do anything), controls are stupid because you move around fast and arcadey, and then when you want to go prone you can't because it's blocked it's so random I haven't got time to figure out if my prone is going to be blocked or not with all the bullets flying through the walls, I think that if you want a run and gunner like COD4, then you might as well play UT3, UT3 has pretty much the same speed controls, more game modes, more gore, good weapons, better graphics, bigger and better maps, better mods, vehicles etc... And BF2 IMO is better than all because the maps are huge, vehicles to suit all tastes, good weapon set and there is a good learning curve (bullet drop, different guns and vehicles etc) that isn't in many games (and you don't rank up every second like COD), and because of the big maps, 64 player servers, vehicles, and noobs and pros, so much random stuff happens in every game that it's always funny and obviously it's not always a joke you can play the game how you like and work with your team/squad or on your own you can do what you like, that's why I like BF2 and I will probably play it until I get bored of games because I know full well that it won't be beat by any other shooter (in my opinion), even with some of the glitches and that, when you get used to it it just becomes a part of the game and for some reason I think it makes it better lol it sort of adds a "BF" style. I think the reason that COD4 is so popular is because a lot of my mates have got it and just have a quick go when they get in from work, and they're not even gamers it's just an easy game to pick up and play for a laugh, but maybe people just haven't got the patience for BF2 as it has a much longer learning curve, but if they did have the time and patience I think BF2 would be the most popular game, don't see why not, the ONLY slightly bad thing to me about BF is the graphics but they don't even look bad they look neat- I like Battlefield 2
Well said mate thats exactly my opinion. BF2 is the best shooter i have ever played and NOTHING is going to change that.
JoshP
Banned
+176|5690|Notts, UK

Mint Sauce wrote:

MrAnderson wrote:

Wasn't attacking you, I was attacking the POS that is CoD4 multiplayer, which so many people rave about
Meh, I don't think it's shit. Take time to learn about it and get into it properly and it's pretty good, still not as good as BF2 though.

It's also more popular than BF2. #_#
yeah... but WoW is also more popular....

popular isn't better
Mint Sauce
Frighteningly average
+780|6287|eng

JoshP wrote:

Mint Sauce wrote:

MrAnderson wrote:

Wasn't attacking you, I was attacking the POS that is CoD4 multiplayer, which so many people rave about
Meh, I don't think it's shit. Take time to learn about it and get into it properly and it's pretty good, still not as good as BF2 though.

It's also more popular than BF2. #_#
yeah... but WoW is also more popular....

popular isn't better
Never said it was.

Icleos wrote:

Mint Sauce wrote:

MrAnderson wrote:

Yeah, it's not shit really, I just got bored of it quickly

It has to be more popular being a newer game too...
On PS3 alone, there are over 3 million accounts. Not even 1 million on BF2.
BF2 on the console is a very different game compared to the PC.

It's shit.  Almost as bad a fuel for war...  And that game was a crap in a nice looking box.

Where did I comment about BF2: Modern Warfare just out of curiosity? I was comparing the PS3 version of CoD4 against the PC version on BF2. Active (i.e. has points) accounts on CoD4 PS3 are about 3m vs about 1m for PC BF2.. -.~

H3RB4L ABU53 wrote:

I've always hated COD4 I bought it because of all the hype, played single player for a few missions and thought yea it's good, but I hate single player against bots who pretend to not know where you are, multiplayer is the ONLY way to play any game in my opinion, so I went into MP and was shocked at grenade spams, puny levels, and the speed of the whole game is just unrealistic, and when I see the choppers it just frustrates me that I can't get in 1, let alone a jet. Everything, apart from the graphics, makes me want to play BF2- COD4= sniper rifles are pointless, no vehicles (apart from the stupid choppers that the player racks up kills for but doesn't have to do anything), controls are stupid because you move around fast and arcadey, and then when you want to go prone you can't because it's blocked it's so random I haven't got time to figure out if my prone is going to be blocked or not with all the bullets flying through the walls, I think that if you want a run and gunner like COD4, then you might as well play UT3, UT3 has pretty much the same speed controls, more game modes, more gore, good weapons, better graphics, bigger and better maps, better mods, vehicles etc... And BF2 IMO is better than all because the maps are huge, vehicles to suit all tastes, good weapon set and there is a good learning curve (bullet drop, different guns and vehicles etc) that isn't in many games (and you don't rank up every second like COD), and because of the big maps, 64 player servers, vehicles, and noobs and pros, so much random stuff happens in every game that it's always funny and obviously it's not always a joke you can play the game how you like and work with your team/squad or on your own you can do what you like, that's why I like BF2 and I will probably play it until I get bored of games because I know full well that it won't be beat by any other shooter (in my opinion), even with some of the glitches and that, when you get used to it it just becomes a part of the game and for some reason I think it makes it better lol it sort of adds a "BF" style. I think the reason that COD4 is so popular is because a lot of my mates have got it and just have a quick go when they get in from work, and they're not even gamers it's just an easy game to pick up and play for a laugh, but maybe people just haven't got the patience for BF2 as it has a much longer learning curve, but if they did have the time and patience I think BF2 would be the most popular game, don't see why not, the ONLY slightly bad thing to me about BF is the graphics but they don't even look bad they look neat- I like Battlefield 2
Holy wall of text batman!

Last edited by Mint Sauce (2008-10-21 12:30:15)

#rekt
Icleos
Member
+101|6743

Mint Sauce wrote:

Icleos wrote:

Mint Sauce wrote:

On PS3 alone, there are over 3 million accounts. Not even 1 million on BF2.
BF2 on the console is a very different game compared to the PC.

It's shit.  Almost as bad a fuel for war...  And that game was a crap in a nice looking box.

Where did I comment about BF2: Modern Warfare just out of curiosity? I was comparing the PS3 version of CoD4 against the PC version on BF2. Active (i.e. has points) accounts on CoD4 PS3 are about 3m vs about 1m for PC BF2.. -.~
Well I logically assumed you were comparing console to console instead of one verses overall.
If you want to understand why cod4 pulled a larger audience then you should look at what separates it from bf2.

Cod4 got a lot of publicity especially coming off as Game of The Year.  Bf2 did not.
Cod4 offers an incredible story mode and a multiplayer.  Bf2 or the Battlefield series for that matter was intended to only offer a multiplayer.
Cod4 has three years worth of technology, if not more ahead, than Bf2 does.  Graphics, original game design, physics engine, programed code, etc...
Cod4 was designed across the PC and consoles with very little differences.  BF2 was originally designed for only the PC and then eventually made into a different/lesser version for PS2.
Cod4 packs a lot of resemblance and fundamental gameplay aspects close to that of CSS.  Pulling in interest from the competitive and large fan base of that from counterstrike.  Bf2 does not, even with the introduced "infantry only" option.
This may explain why the competition play is also much larger than bf2 ever was for both CAL and TWL.

Last edited by Icleos (2008-10-21 15:19:20)

MrAnderson
Ghost Town T90/Apache Whore
+99|6000|Aberdeen, Scotland
Good points there Icleos.

BF2 and CoD4 are totally different styles of game, tbh
JoshP
Banned
+176|5690|Notts, UK

MrAnderson wrote:

Good points there Icleos.

BF2 and CoD4 are totally different styles of game, tbh
bf2 =

but COD isn't amirite?


specialistx2324
hahahahahhaa
+244|6690|arica harbour

MrAnderson wrote:

Good points there Icleos.

BF2 and CoD4 are totally different styles of game, tbh
doest take that many brain cells to figure that out.
Longbow
Member
+163|6647|Odessa, Ukraine

specialistx2324 wrote:

MrAnderson wrote:

Good points there Icleos.

BF2 and CoD4 are totally different styles of game, tbh
doest take that many brain cells to figure that out.
true, and BF2 is simply the best of two.
N00bkilla55404
Voices are calling...
+136|5932|Somewhere out in Space

Icleos wrote:

Mint Sauce wrote:

Icleos wrote:


BF2 on the console is a very different game compared to the PC.

It's shit.  Almost as bad a fuel for war...  And that game was a crap in a nice looking box.

Where did I comment about BF2: Modern Warfare just out of curiosity? I was comparing the PS3 version of CoD4 against the PC version on BF2. Active (i.e. has points) accounts on CoD4 PS3 are about 3m vs about 1m for PC BF2.. -.~
Well I logically assumed you were comparing console to console instead of one verses overall.
If you want to understand why cod4 pulled a larger audience then you should look at what separates it from bf2.

Cod4 got a lot of publicity especially coming off as Game of The Year.  Bf2 did not.
Cod4 offers an incredible story mode and a multiplayer.  Bf2 or the Battlefield series for that matter was intended to only offer a multiplayer.
Cod4 has three years worth of technology, if not more ahead, than Bf2 does.  Graphics, original game design, physics engine, programed code, etc...
Cod4 was designed across the PC and consoles with very little differences.  BF2 was originally designed for only the PC and then eventually made into a different/lesser version for PS2.
Cod4 packs a lot of resemblance and fundamental gameplay aspects close to that of CSS.  Pulling in interest from the competitive and large fan base of that from counterstrike.  Bf2 does not, even with the introduced "infantry only" option.
This may explain why the competition play is also much larger than bf2 ever was for both CAL and TWL.
PC fo nubs we gots a 360 cause that makes us 1337 wait wats this red ring shit my god it wont work anymore reeeeeeeeh
specialistx2324
hahahahahhaa
+244|6690|arica harbour

Longbow wrote:

specialistx2324 wrote:

MrAnderson wrote:

Good points there Icleos.

BF2 and CoD4 are totally different styles of game, tbh
doest take that many brain cells to figure that out.
true, and BF2 is simply the best of two.
id say bf2 has more "objective" stuff than COD4 and BF2 excells in vehicle combat. COD4 does one thing well if not better than BF2 and that is infantry combat. when i used to play BF2 it felt like the dude with a crap load of points and kills is someone who

a) is a commander
b) someone who vehicle hogs every round
c) some dickhead support/ medic player who spams health kits/ nades

there is obviously no spamming in COD4 except having at leat the FragX3 perk.
Longbow
Member
+163|6647|Odessa, Ukraine

specialistx2324 wrote:

COD4 does one thing well if not better than BF2 and that is infantry combat
Infantry combat without squads = shit. I agree mostly agree on other points though.
Cute.Nemean^inf
Member
+70|6326|The Netherlands
Well I heard other news about the BF3 subject.
Zee.OMGits a54
name sucks kthnx
+6|5916|Earth
if you could add bf2 and cod4 together, it would be perfect.

eg the graphics on bf2 are crap, while cod4 has great gfx.
and the hit rego on bf2 SUCKS, while cod4 has pretty good hit rego boxes (or so i've heard)
Scorpion0x17
can detect anyone's visible post count...
+691|6767|Cambridge (UK)
What's "rego"?
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6501|so randum

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

What's "rego"?
some nerd shit.
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Mint Sauce
Frighteningly average
+780|6287|eng

FatherTed wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

What's "rego"?
some nerd shit.
Hit registration. E.g BF2 has shit reg because maybe 1/2 the bullets that should hit actually do. CoD4, i'd say most bullets hit unless you've got a ping of 300+ or have down syndrome.
#rekt
100% Irishpride
Banned
+81|6160|Dublin

Mint Sauce wrote:

FatherTed wrote:

Scorpion0x17 wrote:

What's "rego"?
some nerd shit.
Hit registration. E.g BF2 has shit reg because maybe 1/2 the bullets that should hit actually do. CoD4, i'd say most bullets hit unless you've got a ping of 300+ or have down syndrome.
We don't want the reg cartoon like like CSS, Somewhere in-between BF2, CoD4 and CSS would be nice, with smoother movement.
HSG
Member
+23|6475|British Columbia, Canada

jord wrote:

BL4CKL10N wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

If that's enough to ruin one's day, one should look into taking a walk outside.

It's fucking DICE. Get used to it.
Don't tell me you don't feel disappointed right now, we've all waited for BF3...
Not rly
YES RLY!

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard