yup, especially the videos with hidden agendas.FEOS wrote:
YouTube is credible media at this point?
FEOS wrote:
Typical McCain supporter that gets shown on the news.
So, the tv media is obviously bias.FEOS wrote:
YouTube is credible media at this point?
Last edited by TheAussieReaper (2008-10-12 07:49:03)
youtube is the cesspool of idiots around the world for this generation.Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:
yup, especially the videos with hidden agendas.FEOS wrote:
YouTube is credible media at this point?
Last edited by SealXo (2008-10-12 09:06:34)
Last edited by SealXo (2008-10-12 09:58:02)
to college kids and people who cannot think for themselves yes.FEOS wrote:
YouTube is credible media at this point?
YouTube is just the medium of showing the video. I don't see how it has anything to do with anything.FEOS wrote:
YouTube is credible media at this point?
OMG stupid people. She read that in a comic? comic=serious bussinesReciprocity wrote:
"I don't trust Obama," a woman said. "I have read about him. He's an Arab."
it is relevant skittles when people get their stupid ass "facts" from them.Mek-Stizzle wrote:
YouTube is just the medium of showing the video. I don't see how it has anything to do with anything.FEOS wrote:
YouTube is credible media at this point?
This forum, all it has turned into, is people bitching about the medium. Whether it's CNN, or Fox, or YouTube. When someone brings up the "source" card, you know that they can't think of anything else or the actual content itself.
You people would make good politicians, always changing the subject on the sly and getting around things.
"John McDoosh wants to blow our kidz up and suck oil fro miraq"usmarine wrote:
it is relevant skittles when people get their stupid ass "facts" from them.Mek-Stizzle wrote:
YouTube is just the medium of showing the video. I don't see how it has anything to do with anything.FEOS wrote:
YouTube is credible media at this point?
This forum, all it has turned into, is people bitching about the medium. Whether it's CNN, or Fox, or YouTube. When someone brings up the "source" card, you know that they can't think of anything else or the actual content itself.
You people would make good politicians, always changing the subject on the sly and getting around things.
What has that post got to do with anything?SealXo wrote:
"John McDoosh wants to blow our kidz up and suck oil fro miraq"usmarine wrote:
it is relevant skittles when people get their stupid ass "facts" from them.Mek-Stizzle wrote:
YouTube is just the medium of showing the video. I don't see how it has anything to do with anything.
This forum, all it has turned into, is people bitching about the medium. Whether it's CNN, or Fox, or YouTube. When someone brings up the "source" card, you know that they can't think of anything else or the actual content itself.
You people would make good politicians, always changing the subject on the sly and getting around things.
The problem with YouTube vids is that you don't know the provenance of them. You at least can assume you know it with news outlets.Mek-Stizzle wrote:
YouTube is just the medium of showing the video. I don't see how it has anything to do with anything.FEOS wrote:
YouTube is credible media at this point?
This forum, all it has turned into, is people bitching about the medium. Whether it's CNN, or Fox, or YouTube. When someone brings up the "source" card, you know that they can't think of anything else or the actual content itself.
You people would make good politicians, always changing the subject on the sly and getting around things.
I'd say he's the least likely to pull something illegal out of the bag.Braddock wrote:
I do enjoy watching Republicans crash and burn but don't rule anything out when it comes to US politics... McCain may pull something (possibly illegal) out of the bag.
The most likely being who?FEOS wrote:
I'd say he's the least likely to pull something illegal out of the bag.Braddock wrote:
I do enjoy watching Republicans crash and burn but don't rule anything out when it comes to US politics... McCain may pull something (possibly illegal) out of the bag.
I'm not going there, as that was not the implication I was making.Braddock wrote:
The most likely being who?FEOS wrote:
I'd say he's the least likely to pull something illegal out of the bag.Braddock wrote:
I do enjoy watching Republicans crash and burn but don't rule anything out when it comes to US politics... McCain may pull something (possibly illegal) out of the bag.
That's fair enough. The voter-related controversies of past elections have been more in connection with the Bush administration and with the private companies handling the voting systems... so McCain has no actual connection with that other than he happens to also be a member of the Republican party.FEOS wrote:
I'm not going there, as that was not the implication I was making.Braddock wrote:
The most likely being who?FEOS wrote:
I'd say he's the least likely to pull something illegal out of the bag.
McCain has a history of integrity...his defense of Obama in the face of ridiculous internet-fueled theories being just one example.
Just what illegal activity are you implying Bush participated in in previous elections? That horse has been beaten enough. The only ones who think there was illegal voting activity also believe the US government was behind 9/11.Braddock wrote:
That's fair enough. The voter-related controversies of past elections have been more in connection with the Bush administration and with the private companies handling the voting systems... so McCain has no actual connection with that other than he happens to also be a member of the Republican party.FEOS wrote:
I'm not going there, as that was not the implication I was making.Braddock wrote:
The most likely being who?
McCain has a history of integrity...his defense of Obama in the face of ridiculous internet-fueled theories being just one example.
Let's just hope no side resorts to such nefarious acts!
Bush didn't have his prints on anything at all and will never be indicted for anything relating to the controversies but he did benefit from them.FEOS wrote:
Just what illegal activity are you implying Bush participated in in previous elections? That horse has been beaten enough. The only ones who think there was illegal voting activity also believe the US government was behind 9/11.
You make it sound like bringing it to court was a bad thing... everyone I've read about the whole messy situation smacks of malpractice and corruption.usmarine wrote:
it was gores decision to bring it to the court. small fact people overlook. just thought we should make that clear.