its the fact they let him buy it.Poseidon wrote:
He BOUGHT IT.
How is this any indication of media bias? Just about anyone can buy a block of time on network TV if they have the money. And he does.
It's like saying "political ads indicate media bias".
Probably just insurance tbh.Hurricane2k9 wrote:
Isn't he far in the lead in the polls anyway? Seems like a waste of money tbh.
And who the fuck wants to watch a commercial for 30 minutes?
So what? I'm sure if McCan bought it, you'd have no problem with it. And frankly, being this far behind in the polls (and the state by states indicating an Obama win), McCain SHOULD.SealXo wrote:
its the fact they let him buy it.Poseidon wrote:
He BOUGHT IT.
How is this any indication of media bias? Just about anyone can buy a block of time on network TV if they have the money. And he does.
It's like saying "political ads indicate media bias".
no, neither should.Poseidon wrote:
Probably just insurance tbh.Hurricane2k9 wrote:
Isn't he far in the lead in the polls anyway? Seems like a waste of money tbh.
And who the fuck wants to watch a commercial for 30 minutes?
And nobody knows what it's going to be.So what? I'm sure if McCan bought it, you'd have no problem with it. And frankly, being this far behind in the polls (and the state by states indicating an Obama win), McCain SHOULD.SealXo wrote:
its the fact they let him buy it.Poseidon wrote:
He BOUGHT IT.
How is this any indication of media bias? Just about anyone can buy a block of time on network TV if they have the money. And he does.
It's like saying "political ads indicate media bias".
Hillary thought she was far in the lead too. And then she got spanked. The fight isn't over until Nov 4.Hurricane2k9 wrote:
Isn't he far in the lead in the polls anyway? Seems like a waste of money tbh.
Last edited by Protecus (2008-10-09 18:39:14)
And so did you.Poseidon wrote:
He BOUGHT IT.
How is this any indication of media bias? Just about anyone can buy a block of time on network TV if they have the money. And he does.
It's like saying "political ads indicate media bias".
Last edited by Deadmonkiefart (2008-10-09 18:54:51)
Oh please, divulge. I'd love to hear this one.DBBrinson1 wrote:
And so did you.Poseidon wrote:
He BOUGHT IT.
How is this any indication of media bias? Just about anyone can buy a block of time on network TV if they have the money. And he does.
It's like saying "political ads indicate media bias".
You may hear, but I doubt it will make it through...Poseidon wrote:
Oh please, divulge. I'd love to hear this one.DBBrinson1 wrote:
And so did you.Poseidon wrote:
He BOUGHT IT.
How is this any indication of media bias? Just about anyone can buy a block of time on network TV if they have the money. And he does.
It's like saying "political ads indicate media bias".
So basically what you've successfully managed to do in one post is regurgitate all the failed McCain arguments against the Obama campaign.DBBrinson1 wrote:
You may hear, but I doubt it will make it through...Poseidon wrote:
Oh please, divulge. I'd love to hear this one.DBBrinson1 wrote:
And so did you.
He's the backstreet hanna montanna of politics... He's paid for the ad time (all private) to convince the simpletons with catch phrases of "yes we can" , "McCain/Bush 8 years" and "change". And the simpletons ate it up faster than a homeless guy registered by ACORN taken to vote in multiple counties for OBAMA under the guise of god knows what. It's pathetic and for the first time in my life (unlike Michelle Obama) I'm ashamed of my fellow Americans. And you sir are part of the retardation/weakening of my country. You are about to vote for a socialist, person that has condoned leaders of genocide anarchy and radical ideology.
He learned with Hillary not to take leads for granted.Hurricane2k9 wrote:
Isn't he far in the lead in the polls anyway? Seems like a waste of money tbh.
And who the fuck wants to watch a commercial for 30 minutes?
Failed or unaddressed by the media? Could it be your die hard hatred for Republicans makes you numb to facts?Poseidon wrote:
So basically what you've successfully managed to do in one post is regurgitate all the failed McCain arguments against the Obama campaign.
Congratulations. I've never seen a failure be so successful.
Besides the Iraq war in McCain and Bush's eyes, that is.
No neither should.Poseidon wrote:
Probably just insurance tbh.Hurricane2k9 wrote:
Isn't he far in the lead in the polls anyway? Seems like a waste of money tbh.
And who the fuck wants to watch a commercial for 30 minutes?
And nobody knows what it's going to be.So what? I'm sure if McCan bought it, you'd have no problem with it. And frankly, being this far behind in the polls (and the state by states indicating an Obama win), McCain SHOULD.SealXo wrote:
its the fact they let him buy it.Poseidon wrote:
He BOUGHT IT.
How is this any indication of media bias? Just about anyone can buy a block of time on network TV if they have the money. And he does.
It's like saying "political ads indicate media bias".
If you knew anything about my posting habits, you'd know I indeed do not hate republicans. Just John McCain, Sarah Palin and the rest of the sheep giving ridiculous arguments supporting their campaigns. I'm actually a very big fan of former NY Gov. George Pataki (republican), NYC Mayor Mike Bloomerg (republican) and Nebraska Sen. Chuck Hagel (you guessed it...a republican).DBBrinson1 wrote:
Failed or unaddressed by the media? Could it be your die hard hatred for Republicans makes you numb to facts?Poseidon wrote:
So basically what you've successfully managed to do in one post is regurgitate all the failed McCain arguments against the Obama campaign.
Congratulations. I've never seen a failure be so successful.
Besides the Iraq war in McCain and Bush's eyes, that is.
What I see is you failing to recognize what our brothers and sister in arms did in name of Freedom.. You spout venom about fellow Americans. We won. Go ahead and spout defeatist shit. So tell me how is Saddam doing over there in power? How's all the new Al Quaeda terrorist attacks going? Congratulations. I've never seen free speech so protected.
so, obama is included with the sheep, yes?Poseidon wrote:
the rest of the sheep giving ridiculous arguments supporting their campaigns.
Ridiculous arguments? On character alone McCain.... Size the individuals up. You've bought into the fluff.Poseidon wrote:
If you knew anything about my posting habits, you'd know I indeed do not hate republicans. Just John McCain, Sarah Palin and the rest of the sheep giving ridiculous arguments supporting their campaigns. I'm actually a very big fan of former NY Gov. George Pataki (republican), NYC Mayor Mike Bloomerg (republican) and Nebraska Sen. Chuck Hagel (you guessed it...a republican).
In the name of FREEDOM? Yeah, just like Al Qaeda attacked us on 9/11 because they "hate us for our freedom", right?
Most of the McCain supporters provide completely baseless or untrue arguments, or support them for the most ridiculous reasons on earth. For example, the people who support Palin because "she's hot" and McCain because "he's a war hero". But yes, they're no better than the people who are voting for Obama because he's black.Parker wrote:
so, obama is included with the sheep, yes?Poseidon wrote:
the rest of the sheep giving ridiculous arguments supporting their campaigns.
for that matter, ALL politicians....seeing as they all do what you just described.
Maybe I overestimated you.Poseidon wrote:
Most of the McCain supporters provide completely baseless or untrue arguments, or support them for the most ridiculous reasons on earth. For example, the people who support Palin because "she's hot" and McCain because "he's a war hero". But yes, they're no better than the people who are voting for Obama because he's black.Parker wrote:
so, obama is included with the sheep, yes?Poseidon wrote:
the rest of the sheep giving ridiculous arguments supporting their campaigns.
for that matter, ALL politicians....seeing as they all do what you just described.
as do most obama supporters....and the people that support chief wanna doobie, or whoever the fuck NORML has trying to run for office.Poseidon wrote:
Most of the McCain supporters provide completely baseless or untrue arguments, or support them for the most ridiculous reasons on earth.
So wait, you're basically telling me now that you're not even voting for McCain based on the issues?DBBrinson1 wrote:
Ridiculous arguments? On character alone McCain.... Size the individuals up. You've bought into the fluff.Poseidon wrote:
If you knew anything about my posting habits, you'd know I indeed do not hate republicans. Just John McCain, Sarah Palin and the rest of the sheep giving ridiculous arguments supporting their campaigns. I'm actually a very big fan of former NY Gov. George Pataki (republican), NYC Mayor Mike Bloomerg (republican) and Nebraska Sen. Chuck Hagel (you guessed it...a republican).
In the name of FREEDOM? Yeah, just like Al Qaeda attacked us on 9/11 because they "hate us for our freedom", right?
I know your intelligence. That's why I bothered posting. Wake up. Al Qaeda attacked us because they were manipulated by a man motivated by US influence which was blocking his claim to leadership in a country. He used radical islam to achieve his goal. How's that been going for him?
1)Al Kinda! went into Iraq to fight trained soldiers instead of hijacking airplanes/ firebombing structures in the US. Al Kinda got their asses kicked.Poseidon wrote:
So wait, you're basically telling me now that you're not even voting for McCain based on the issues?
Nice.
Obviously the only one who's "bought into" anything here is you, my friend.
And actually, it's apparentely been going pretty good for him (OBL). He spread Al Qaeda's influence because Bush failed to stay in Afghanistan, thus allowing 1) Al Qaeda to get into Iraq and 2) him to escape.