BF2S Forums McCain/Palin 08!!!!

Coronado, there's a difference between being experienced and being inexperienced.  There's also a difference between being inexperienced and knowing what you're talking about and being inexperienced and not knowing what you're talking about.

That made absolutely no sense.  Saying "the questions didnt make any sense" is a crap excuse, if any other of the candidates, hell, if any senator or representative in the country had been asked the same question they could've come up with a better answer than that.  It's pretty solid evidence she doesn't know jack shit and they've been spoonfeeding her stuff to say to the press.

Last edited by Spearhead (2008-09-28 16:41:50)

She did a poor job of explaining something.

Almost as bad as clearly saying something that is 180 degrees out from what your running mate says.

No wait...

Spearhead wrote:

Saying "the questions didnt make any sense" is a crap excuse, if any other of the candidates, hell, if any senator or representative in the country had been asked the same question they could've come up with a better answer than that.  It's pretty solid evidence she doesn't know jack shit and they've been spoonfeeding her stuff to say to the press.

Not really a crap excuse. The question she asked made no sense. It was run-on jiberish.

Most politicians would come up with a better response. Mostly because they never even address the questions they are asked. They simply say what they've practiced over and over in response to such questions. Palin's got some work to do in that area.

Braddock wrote:

lowing wrote:

Braddock wrote:

I'm no politician but the question seemed pretty clear to me... Basically why not put the $700,000,000,000 into programs that help middle class families directly rather than giving it to the companies who's careless activities caused the financial crisis in the first place? Palin just panics and goes off into a tangential rant, naming as many important-sounding things as she can think of.

Also, I'm no defender of CNN but to be fair Blitzer does play devil's advocate at the end of that clip and tries to explain what was going on with her answer.

I got an idea because I agree with you Braddock. Let the people of America have the money back and not the big companies.

So lets do this, I get back ALL of my tax dollars that paid, for the past, lets say 5 years, the rich get ALL of their tax dollars back and the poor get ALL of their tax dollars backs. Does this sound fair enough to you?

Sounds a little like the PRSI system of welfare benefit to me lowing i.e. getting back PRSI tax you have paid in the past when you are currently unemployed... are you turning socialist in your old age?

Hell no!, but everyone seems to think the 700 billion should go to the people instead of the corporations, I tend to agree, so if money is to be dispersed to the masses, let everyone get back EXACTLY what they put in, including the poor. this should be acceptable to you, but somehow I think it will not be.

Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:

Spearhead wrote:

Saying "the questions didnt make any sense" is a crap excuse, if any other of the candidates, hell, if any senator or representative in the country had been asked the same question they could've come up with a better answer than that.  It's pretty solid evidence she doesn't know jack shit and they've been spoonfeeding her stuff to say to the press.

Not really a crap excuse. The question she asked made no sense. It was run-on jiberish.

Most politicians would come up with a better response. Mostly because they never even address the questions they are asked. They simply say what they've practiced over and over in response to such questions. Palin's got some work to do in that area.

Ya, really a crap excuse.  The question she was asked made some sense.  It was not run on jibberish.  Unless English is your second language. 

Nice little twist in your second paragraph.  lol.  As if my words are set in stone explanations and your words are full on invincible fact.  You are tripping over yourself making excuses for something which was, quite frankly, pretty inexcusable.

The only alternative is if they're doing this intentionally.  They're making her seem as dumb as possible.  That way people will want to have a beer with her.

maybe if she had 400 advisors she wold be set

shes still better than biden for sure

Last edited by SealXo (2008-09-28 17:23:58)

McCainamaniacs are still hanging onto that "57 states" comment?

Guess that explains why they still hang onto that chain letter originated "doesn't hold his hand over his heart for the pledge" too...

SealXo wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

McCainamaniacs are still hanging onto that "57 states" comment?

Guess that explains why they still hang onto that chain letter originated "doesn't hold his hand over his heart for the pledge" too...

I just find it funny how Palin is attacked so much because she is a real threat.


Biden has a COUNTLESS amount of racist, sexist, and just mean videos and if that was Palin, holy shit would her life be over.

Lemme guess...

you think it's sexism?

Ya..holy cow, she is seriously a fucking scary person. She has no fucking clue about anything but passion and will be a heartbeat away from the Offal Office.

I think this Dave Mustaine imitator delivers more coherent sentences:

Biden goes off of what Obama says but still manages to make sense.

She went from a bail out topic to creating jobs under an umbrella. Clearly she knows what she is talking about.

But I do think she has a brain. Sadly for her she isn't good at lying yet. She simply isn't able to spit out what she is being told to say in a coherent manner.

But yeah its still quite scary.

What are you talking about?

FEOS wrote:

She did a poor job of explaining something.

Almost as bad as clearly saying something that is 180 degrees out from what your running mate says.

No wait...

That is not the topic.

I know you are a reasonable guy, the question you should ask yourself, as a military officer, is: would I like to have that woman as my commander in chief?