Locoloki wrote:
Pro's, 700B investment into something that is failing, thus somehow resulting in profit
Con's 700B more gone down the drain if the economy fails, which it still will, because Bush is only doing this so, people who have failed mortgage loans and business loans can do what? take out another loan? fucking retarded. News flash, if you have good credit you can still take out a fucking loan. Bush is trying to build another economic bubble on top of the collapsed one. So now when it fails it will fail doubly
You clearly don't understand the root of the problem.
All the cash in the market is basically tied up in these mortgage-based securities. The bailout is intended to buy up those securities, thus injecting cash back into the market, allowing banks to lend again. But part of the package is ensuring that the lending practices that led to this aren't repeated.
The key is getting liquidity back into the market so credit can be let again, since the unfortunate truth is that the economy (not just ours, but the global economy) is based on institutions lending money to each other and consumers alike.