If they have the permits, its ok. If they don't, shoot them when the cross the border.Vax wrote:
Brainy reply.MGS3_GrayFox wrote:
The US troops were about to cross the border without a permit? Good reaction from the Pakistani troops. I say the next person to cross the border without a permit should get shot.
So should Al Qaeda or Taliban continue to be allowed to have a safe haven over there?
I guess they must have the right 'permits' to come into Afghanistan attack US /nato troops and then run back over the border.
How the hell would U.S troops even know who to attack if they invaded Pakistan? Anybody that shoots at them? It's a little absurd, what exactly were U.S troops looking for again when they crossed during the instance?
Anyway, isn't it well known that the Taliban and Al Qaida, including Osama bin Laden are in Pakistan? So, maybe the U.S are planning an invasion, and are just...Testing the waters for the moment with their recent crossing of the border?
Anyway, isn't it well known that the Taliban and Al Qaida, including Osama bin Laden are in Pakistan? So, maybe the U.S are planning an invasion, and are just...Testing the waters for the moment with their recent crossing of the border?
Nature is a powerful force. Those who seek to subdue nature, never do so permanently.
Whoever is carrying a gun and is pointing at them. Hope the rules of engagement is just a/an suggestion/precaution/option, or we will receive more casualties.Im_Dooomed wrote:
How the hell would U.S troops even know who to attack if they invaded Pakistan? Anybody that shoots at them? It's a little absurd, what exactly were U.S troops looking for again when they crossed during the instance?
Anyway, isn't it well known that the Taliban and Al Qaida, including Osama bin Laden are in Pakistan? So, maybe the U.S are planning an invasion, and are just...Testing the waters for the moment with their recent crossing of the border?
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
...War Man wrote:
Whoever is carrying a gun and is pointing at them. Hope the rules of engagement is just a/an suggestion/precaution/option, or we will receive more casualties.Im_Dooomed wrote:
How the hell would U.S troops even know who to attack if they invaded Pakistan? Anybody that shoots at them? It's a little absurd, what exactly were U.S troops looking for again when they crossed during the instance?
Anyway, isn't it well known that the Taliban and Al Qaida, including Osama bin Laden are in Pakistan? So, maybe the U.S are planning an invasion, and are just...Testing the waters for the moment with their recent crossing of the border?
...
...
Seriously... shush.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
Could be because they don't just say "let's cross the border and see what happens". They go after specific objectives for specific reasons.Im_Dooomed wrote:
How the hell would U.S troops even know who to attack if they invaded Pakistan? Anybody that shoots at them? It's a little absurd, what exactly were U.S troops looking for again when they crossed during the instance?
Anyway, isn't it well known that the Taliban and Al Qaida, including Osama bin Laden are in Pakistan? So, maybe the U.S are planning an invasion, and are just...Testing the waters for the moment with their recent crossing of the border?
And no...sorry. There isn't some big invasion plan for Pakistan. We're not doing anything that the Pak Army isn't also doing in the FATA and NWT.
Last edited by FEOS (2008-09-16 02:12:19)
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
But it could easily escalate out of nothing, esp if the radicals gain power.And no...sorry. There isn't some big invasion plan for Pakistan. We're not doing anything that the Pak Army isn't also doing in the FATA and NWT.
Gulf of Tonkin anyone?
Fuck Israel
How many years of bombings from AQ will it take for them to realize that AQ should be destroyed? If AQ plays their cards right they could get the U.S. and Pakistan to fight it out. Unfortunately the Nuke issue will be a huge problem.
With a McCain administration I think we would be more aggressive (moving troops from Iraq to Afghanistan), and forcing the Pakistanis with heavy diplomatic demands.
With a Obama administration I think we would parlay for years while the AQ attacks into Afghanistan continue until the "War on Terror" is won and we withdraw.
With a McCain administration I think we would be more aggressive (moving troops from Iraq to Afghanistan), and forcing the Pakistanis with heavy diplomatic demands.
With a Obama administration I think we would parlay for years while the AQ attacks into Afghanistan continue until the "War on Terror" is won and we withdraw.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/7627791.stm
well Pakistan needs to decide exactly what its going to do, whether to allow Coalition border crossings to hit AQ targets or get their own men in their to actually do something because if they don't they're just going to pay with more situations like the Marriot bombing.
well Pakistan needs to decide exactly what its going to do, whether to allow Coalition border crossings to hit AQ targets or get their own men in their to actually do something because if they don't they're just going to pay with more situations like the Marriot bombing.
m3thod wrote:
:idontknowhowyoudothatboggleemoticon:
Code:
:wtf
The Taliban/AQ could bomb Pakistan 24/7 but they'll still hate the US/the West more than the Taliban/AQ. That's the problem with them. What's also bad is that they think that it's the USA's fault this is all happening. They blame the US when the Taliban/AQ bomb something, or do something bad.
Erm, Hello, it was you who supported all this Jihad shit against the Soviets in Afghanistan (and then supporting the Taliban after that), and against the Indians in India. It's typical stupidity on their behalf. Also it's easy to blame a country half way around the world for all your problems (they were also blaming the Indians for everything too) and not to blame yourself.
Even the Iraqi's eventually got pissed off at all the terrorist attacks and started doing something about it (working with the US and getting rid of them) Even when the terrorist problem really was the USA's fault in that case.. I doubt you can hold the Pakistani's to the same level of...decency?
Erm, Hello, it was you who supported all this Jihad shit against the Soviets in Afghanistan (and then supporting the Taliban after that), and against the Indians in India. It's typical stupidity on their behalf. Also it's easy to blame a country half way around the world for all your problems (they were also blaming the Indians for everything too) and not to blame yourself.
Even the Iraqi's eventually got pissed off at all the terrorist attacks and started doing something about it (working with the US and getting rid of them) Even when the terrorist problem really was the USA's fault in that case.. I doubt you can hold the Pakistani's to the same level of...decency?
Last edited by Mek-Stizzle (2008-09-21 09:48:59)
Add North Korea to complete the Axis of Evil.Dilbert_X wrote:
The spiral is getting wider, AQ, Taleban, Iraq, Pakistan, Iran and Syria next - Is there a game plan or is it being made up as they go along?
