I thought the purpose of advertising was to get noticed. Then why would Sony run a campaign that people literally walk on top of?
its just being comicalDoctaStrangelove wrote:
I thought the purpose of advertising was to get noticed. Then why would Sony run a campaign that people literally walk on top of?
_______________________________________________________________________________________________ 
Little is the new big? Little, big...you know.DoctaStrangelove wrote:
I thought the purpose of advertising was to get noticed. Then why would Sony run a campaign that people literally walk on top of?
they going to start advertising on mars now?sergeriver wrote:
Little is the new big? Little, big...you know.DoctaStrangelove wrote:
I thought the purpose of advertising was to get noticed. Then why would Sony run a campaign that people literally walk on top of?
Lawl. I giggled.
I was about to say "Usually bill boards are quite a bit bigger then that...."
Then I was like "oh, right..."
Clever.
Then I was like "oh, right..."
Clever.
People will notice it...Anyways it's probably >$20 to make it..DoctaStrangelove wrote:
I thought the purpose of advertising was to get noticed. Then why would Sony run a campaign that people literally walk on top of?
Anyways clever.
Sony should be prepared to receive a mandate asking them to remove all billboards since they're going to be strewn about parks because people keep kicking them over, be it on accident or on purpose (hacky sack(boy) anyone?)
NO, WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY THIS BLASPHEMOUS STATEMENT?sergeriver wrote:
Little is the new big? Little, big...you know.DoctaStrangelove wrote:
I thought the purpose of advertising was to get noticed. Then why would Sony run a campaign that people literally walk on top of?
Interesting idea though..
lewl advert a video game in front of santa monica bums. lol, what a world we live in.