wrong. in typical youtube fashion, you never see the WHOLE show, just little bits of an entire show.Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
THe videos outline what the article talks about. Conservative reporteers attacking Michelle Obama. There is a video to go with your post. Sorry for contributing big guy.
Are you seriously that arrogant?
EDIT: I mean about the original post. This is debate and serious talk; not let-you're-random-thoughts-out thread.
EDIT: I mean about the original post. This is debate and serious talk; not let-you're-random-thoughts-out thread.
Last edited by xBlackPantherx (2008-07-18 23:27:12)
what? his wife goes on shows and talks about politics to get her man elected yet should not be subject to criticism is not worth discussing? k then. who the fuck is the arrogant one now stupid.xBlackPantherx wrote:
Are you seriously that arrogant?
EDIT: I mean about the original post. This is debate and serious talk; not let-you're-random-thoughts-out thread.
I'm with USMarine on this one. She can't actually expect not to be questioned and attacked on political grounds if she is going to get so involved in the campaign. She's entered politics.
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
Calm down. Shit. All I'm saying is that your OP was poorly put and wasn't criticism. More like a I-say-fuck-you-Obama-and-I-want-the-world-to-know. Calm down a bit buddy. You cussing and retaliating at me with immature comments just makes you seem all the less...articulate, to put it kindly.usmarine2 wrote:
what? his wife goes on shows and talks about politics to get her man elected yet should not be subject to criticism is not worth discussing? k then. who the fuck is the arrogant one now stupid.xBlackPantherx wrote:
Are you seriously that arrogant?
EDIT: I mean about the original post. This is debate and serious talk; not let-you're-random-thoughts-out thread.
Try more like:
usmarine2 wrote:
Well, his wife goes on shows and talks about politics to help get Obama elected, yet her subject to criticism is not worth discussing? Ok then. What do you think then?xBlackPantherx wrote:
Are you seriously that arrogant?
EDIT: I mean about the original post. This is debate and serious talk; not let-you're-random-thoughts-out thread.
Last edited by xBlackPantherx (2008-07-19 20:57:55)
i am not here to write a book report. shove it.
Clearly you don't know marine too wellxBlackPantherx wrote:
Calm down. Shit. All I'm saying is that your OP was poorly put and wasn't criticism. More like a I-say-fuck-you-Obama-and-I-want-the-world-to-know. Calm down a bit buddy. You cussing and retaliating at me with immature comments just makes you seem all the less...articulate, to put it kindly.usmarine2 wrote:
what? his wife goes on shows and talks about politics to get her man elected yet should not be subject to criticism is not worth discussing? k then. who the fuck is the arrogant one now stupid.xBlackPantherx wrote:
Are you seriously that arrogant?
EDIT: I mean about the original post. This is debate and serious talk; not let-you're-random-thoughts-out thread.
Try more like:usmarine2 wrote:
Well, his wife goes on shows and talks about politics to help get Obama elected, yet her subject to criticism is not worth discussing? Ok then. What do you think then?xBlackPantherx wrote:
Are you seriously that arrogant?
EDIT: I mean about the original post. This is debate and serious talk; not let-you're-random-thoughts-out thread.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
usmarine's standard line when asked for more detail:usmarine2 wrote:
i am not here to write a book report. shove it.
"More than one line is three lines too many!"
I may not be a fan of obama, BUT he is better than this.
Occasionally, he'll come up with a zinger, like the one in my sig. I don't see any of note in this thread though.ZombieVampire! wrote:
usmarine's standard line when asked for more detail:usmarine2 wrote:
i am not here to write a book report. shove it.
"More than one line is three lines too many!"
That vid was hot, moar...Lynx14 wrote:
I may not be a fan of obama, BUT he is better than this.
what does mccain have to do with it? this is about whether his wife should be subject to the same criticism.
And this is why I do not post more than a couple lines, it aint worth it. nobody sticks to the topic anyway, as you can see on this page, and most threads last a couple days at best. so, short and sweet makes more sense to me.
And this is why I do not post more than a couple lines, it aint worth it. nobody sticks to the topic anyway, as you can see on this page, and most threads last a couple days at best. so, short and sweet makes more sense to me.
damn straightusmarine2 wrote:
what does mccain have to do with it? this is about whether his wife should be subject to the same criticism.
And this is why I do not post more than a couple lines, it aint worth it. nobody sticks to the topic anyway, as you can see on this page, and most threads last a couple days at best. so, short and sweet makes more sense to me.
Ah, so you don't discuss the issue becuase if you do the discussion might grow and evolve. Right.usmarine2 wrote:
what does mccain have to do with it? this is about whether his wife should be subject to the same criticism.
And this is why I do not post more than a couple lines, it aint worth it. nobody sticks to the topic anyway, as you can see on this page, and most threads last a couple days at best. so, short and sweet makes more sense to me.
It's called a derail, don't do it.ZombieVampire! wrote:
Ah, so you don't discuss the issue becuase if you do the discussion might grow and evolve. Right.usmarine2 wrote:
what does mccain have to do with it? this is about whether his wife should be subject to the same criticism.
And this is why I do not post more than a couple lines, it aint worth it. nobody sticks to the topic anyway, as you can see on this page, and most threads last a couple days at best. so, short and sweet makes more sense to me.
Whereas your damn straight is perfectly allowable?
I never said I was perfect.
Nice assumption.
Nice assumption.
So then the damn straight wasn't allowable? Yet in your very next post you criticise me for a post that at least added something to the conversation.
And you don't see an issue with this?
And you don't see an issue with this?
Quite the contrary I agreed with a very valid point marine made that your derail was infact a derail, so in answer to your query, no, I don't see an issue with it.
Ah, so my criticising another poster for refusing to go into detail is a derail. Right. That makes perfect sense. I should, of course, have called a sub-commitee to look into creating a new thread instead.
Is it possible that no one sticks to the topic because, as a rule of thumb, you (and a few others) post complete shit, which then drags the thread away from the original topic?usmarine2 wrote:
what does mccain have to do with it? this is about whether his wife should be subject to the same criticism.
And this is why I do not post more than a couple lines, it aint worth it. nobody sticks to the topic anyway, as you can see on this page, and most threads last a couple days at best. so, short and sweet makes more sense to me.
*awaits the witty response of a 'fuck you' type post*
*awaits nothing to contribute* oh wait, same as always from some of you.ghettoperson wrote:
Is it possible that no one sticks to the topic because, as a rule of thumb, you (and a few others) post complete shit, which then drags the thread away from the original topic?usmarine2 wrote:
what does mccain have to do with it? this is about whether his wife should be subject to the same criticism.
And this is why I do not post more than a couple lines, it aint worth it. nobody sticks to the topic anyway, as you can see on this page, and most threads last a couple days at best. so, short and sweet makes more sense to me.
*awaits the witty response of a 'fuck you' type post*
If you dont like the OP, go fuck right off for all I care. god you are such a retard sometimes.
OMG, What an idiot.Lynx14 wrote:
I may not be a fan of obama, BUT he is better than this.
@OP.
She has made herself a public figure and has campaigned with and for her Husband. She is fair game. Don't like the heat................gtfo.
I agree.JahManRed wrote:
@OP.
She has made herself a public figure and has campaigned with and for her Husband. She is fair game. Don't like the heat................gtfo.
what the fuck is your problem? go piss up a rope.xBlackPantherx wrote:
Or you could stop posting senseless shit.
nice myspace pic gansta.....god I wish I was good at photoshop.
Last edited by usmarine2 (2008-07-20 20:49:52)