Pages: 1 2
Don't what?............Say I told ya so?sergeriver wrote:
Oh, God. Pls don't Lowing.
Did you think it was ANY worse than depicting Bush as Hilter or the devil, he is a Christian ya know, and I don't remember any crying from the Bush campSpark wrote:
TBH I think he has a point. I thought that it was bad, but not that bad.
Call a spade a spade and let satire fly. Its goal is to make people laugh. If you make too much of a deal of it then you could turn off a few voters who see you as too uptight.
Are you serious? Are you basing your opinion on the BS this guy said? The same guy who talks about Obama and his friends from the left, lol?Rick Moron wrote:
But what should trouble anyone is how thin Obama's skin truly is if he can't take a little satire from his friends on the left!
Michelle Malkin puts it nicely when she headlines her post "Grow a pair, Obama" and says "So, you found this satirical New Yorker cover art “tasteless and offensive.” Welcome to public life. Guess what? In Washington, political cartoonists and caricaturists spare no one."
So Obama plays his race/cultural card against a friendly publication while many of his allies on the left dutifully follow his lead and condemn the piece because most of them fear that those of us who live out in flyover country "won't get" the satire.
Thin skinned Obama and his tone deaf, elitist allies; what a combination.
Nope I am basing my opinion on the cover of the magazine and the reaction from the Obama camp over it? SERIOUSLY!!sergeriver wrote:
Are you serious? Are you basing your opinion on the BS this guy said? The same guy who talks about Obama and his friends from the left, lol?Rick Moron wrote:
But what should trouble anyone is how thin Obama's skin truly is if he can't take a little satire from his friends on the left!
Michelle Malkin puts it nicely when she headlines her post "Grow a pair, Obama" and says "So, you found this satirical New Yorker cover art “tasteless and offensive.” Welcome to public life. Guess what? In Washington, political cartoonists and caricaturists spare no one."
So Obama plays his race/cultural card against a friendly publication while many of his allies on the left dutifully follow his lead and condemn the piece because most of them fear that those of us who live out in flyover country "won't get" the satire.
Thin skinned Obama and his tone deaf, elitist allies; what a combination.
And how'd you feel if you were depicted as a black Muslim in the DST HOF thread? Oh, wait...lowing wrote:
Nope I am basing my opinion on the cover of the magazine and the reaction from the Obama camp over it? SERIOUSLY!!sergeriver wrote:
Are you serious? Are you basing your opinion on the BS this guy said? The same guy who talks about Obama and his friends from the left, lol?Rick Moron wrote:
But what should trouble anyone is how thin Obama's skin truly is if he can't take a little satire from his friends on the left!
Michelle Malkin puts it nicely when she headlines her post "Grow a pair, Obama" and says "So, you found this satirical New Yorker cover art “tasteless and offensive.” Welcome to public life. Guess what? In Washington, political cartoonists and caricaturists spare no one."
So Obama plays his race/cultural card against a friendly publication while many of his allies on the left dutifully follow his lead and condemn the piece because most of them fear that those of us who live out in flyover country "won't get" the satire.
Thin skinned Obama and his tone deaf, elitist allies; what a combination.
Yes the difference being was that those were because of his decisions, not just because he is white. Where as in Obama's drawing was simply because he WAS Muslim at some point.lowing wrote:
Did you think it was ANY worse than depicting Bush as Hilter or the devil, he is a Christian ya know, and I don't remember any crying from the Bush campSpark wrote:
TBH I think he has a point. I thought that it was bad, but not that bad.
Call a spade a spade and let satire fly. Its goal is to make people laugh. If you make too much of a deal of it then you could turn off a few voters who see you as too uptight.
I don't, not one bit.God Save the Queen wrote:
why do you care so much about race lowing?
hes the one that originally dropped the race card, if im not mistaken. his superfluous use of it so early in the game only demonstrates what sort of campaign is to come.lowing wrote:
Everything is racist and personal when dealing with Obama, his decisions, or his image.
sorry ya think so, ut you will never find in ANY of my posts where I spout off about how superior or inferior a race is. I target individuals of any race depending on the issue.God Save the Queen wrote:
just seems you have more than a casual interest
Absolutely true. It is gunna be a long race filled 4 years if he is elected.Parker wrote:
hes the one that originally dropped the race card, if im not mistaken. his superfluous use of it so early in the game only demonstrates what sort of campaign is to come.lowing wrote:
Everything is racist and personal when dealing with Obama, his decisions, or his image.
im done voting anyway.
at this point, were fucked if we do, and fucked if we dont. one evil, or the other.
Last edited by lowing (2008-07-16 11:22:36)
who said I thats how I tranlate "sagger"?lowing wrote:
I hate saggers, I am sorry ,but that does not translate into I hate black people. No matter much you want it to for arguments sake.
thats why i said, fucked if we do, fucked we dont.lowing wrote:
Absolutely true. It is gunna be a long race filled 4 years if he is elected.
Also take note that I said this here and now.
4 years later when history judges Obama's administration, if it is judged poorly, it will be because America was not ready for a black president, and the white congress did everything it could to make him fail.
Gunslinger, please be fair, you know the point I was trying to make here.God Save the Queen wrote:
who said I thats how I tranlate "sagger"?lowing wrote:
I hate saggers, I am sorry ,but that does not translate into I hate black people. No matter much you want it to for arguments sake.
So what is your take on the OP?God Save the Queen wrote:
I think Ive got more experience being and living around blacks folks than the average person reading this.
no I was trying to use an example as to how I judge actions and not race. I used the sagging thing as an example that just because I hate that shit, does not mean that I hate black people....Gunslinger is being a bit difficult in giving me that point.Parker wrote:
are you seriously talking about the pants thing, or is this some new gang im unfamiliar with?
if its the pants thing, did someone here bring racism up about that?
Last edited by lowing (2008-07-16 11:45:26)
Pages: 1 2