BF2S Forums One thing I think we can all agree on that we want from BF3.

hiberNative wrote:

bf3 needs a proper an-94 with 2 round burst.

Take the M16A1 instead. It's burst is precise enough for the first two shots to hit target.
If they consider adding the AN-94 to BF3 they'd be forced to make it a non-headshot weapon just like the M16.

Tecnically it would be a weapon without any recoil.

But the G36E is already out. So no need for another one of those.

snake just sucks at karkand.

DoctaStrangelove wrote:

However on Karkand since the map is so linear and cramped there is no way you can use strategy.

of course you can use strategy @ karkand. it's just on a smaller scale.

I want them to take a long time on it & polish it, i.e no bugs. I want to have it in Dx10 with more of everything it already has. Stats that update over the weekend . Bonus points for team work like 2142 but without the gayness of 2142. I want tracker to have exclusive rights to the stats since we were burned on 2142. Nukes for the commanders or atleast more attack options. A new class; imbedded reporter with suck ass weapons i.e pen , that you are forced to take every tk. Clan support, rankings as a clan & goodie options for them. Interchangable sides with the maps, custom messaging for the game instead of having to mess with the registry i.e orange text & such. With rank ups, maybe increase abilitys by 1%. For it to be bigger than BF2 & all the expansions put together. No nerfing after release. Not much eh?

Last edited by TrollmeaT (2008-07-14 16:12:16)

I want it to play somewhat like BF2, except like CS, except like Call of Duty 18, except not, except yes, because everyone is a noob except me. Then I want discussion about BF4 to be illegal under international law. Guess which sentence is sarcastic.

Most of what was already said... But I want more city maps!

FrankieSpankie3388 wrote:

Snake wrote:

No Wake and/or karkand.

No Karkand would be nice. But seriously, why no Wake? Wake is absolutely amazing. There's a reason why it's the only map in both BF1942 and BF2, isn't it in BF2142 too?

URGH. No. It is not amazing.

Yeah, I know, Im a dirty Kark whore, though thats mainly because of hardware limitations up until 2 days ago (barable FPS on Kark, and if Im lucky, Mash), but theyre both whore fests and end up being one-sided repetitive battles.

I don't understand why TWL doesn't play in 1.2, or 1.3. You know, better versions. Or any league for that matter.

Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:

Same game minus the bugs, including fixing the hit reg and no IO mode.

Actually theres a lot of stuff they could fix. BF2 with no bugs would still be the boring and dumb 24/7 Karkand/Wake 24/7 FF off crap that it is now.

Why no IO mode?

I guess I don't understand what people have against IO. If you don't like it don't play it. I like to about 1/4 of the time when I'm not on Wake.

Guy.Buddy.Friend wrote:

I don't understand why TWL doesn't play in 1.2, or 1.3. You know, better versions. Or any league for that matter.

Probably because they want the round to last five minutes before the server crashes.

Miniman7474 wrote:

Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:

Same game minus the bugs, including fixing the hit reg and no IO mode.

Actually theres a lot of stuff they could fix. BF2 with no bugs would still be the boring and dumb 24/7 Karkand/Wake 24/7 FF off crap that it is now.

Why no IO mode?

I guess I don't understand what people have against IO. If you don't like it don't play it. I like to about 1/4 of the time when I'm not on Wake.

I don't hate IO entirely. I hate what it did to BF2. It went from lots of good rotation servers to nothing but 24/7 Karkands. I miss when it wasn't a challenge to find a map other than Karkand/Wake. It also killed the teamwork aspect of BF2. No need to ask each other what kit to play and what role they're going to fill when you can all go medic. Plus its easy to tell that the maps and the game wasn't designed for IO. Theres 100's of other games out there that focus on IO combat. I liked BF2 because it was a combination of vehicles and IO combat.

Battlefield: 2.5

G-NOT_(:0) wrote:

DoctaStrangelove wrote:

G-NOT_(:0) wrote:

snake just sucks at karkand.

Yes he does, and there's a reason for that.

Ya' see, Snake relies on having superior strategy over his foes in order to defeat them. However on Karkand since the map is so linear and cramped there is no way you can use strategy. Without being able to outsmart his enemies since the map doesn't allow for it Snake fails.

lol, so just shoot and kill eh? no strategical plan, just shoot and kill...

obviously u never played 5 v 5 or 8 v 8, or just pub fo realz in a server without having some sort of plan...?

sure its all about getting the kills without planning it out, but thats if only you're a nub. it's all about securing which area you are in, and how to maneuver yourself without getting owned. But if your pub'n with a friend or a clan, its like a pack, you don't mess with one another without getting bagged or raped.

"you dont just 'charge in' and starting shooting randomly".../sarcasm

but w/eva, you play your way and i'll do the same. cya on the field...

But really you do. On Karkand the map is to thin, to linear, to mined-up to effectively flank, and with everyone spawning at the same two points there is no way to really get anywhere unless one team is ridiculously better than the other. With Karkand the only tactic is charge the Hotel flag and get blown up by a mine.

I don't have anything against small maps, Mass Destruction is my favorite map and it's the smallest in the game. I do however have a problem with poorly designed maps like Karkand. It is the only map were from at the beginning of the round there is no room for tactics. It's just bum-rush the hotel.

Compare that to some other inf maps. On Sharqi MEC can take RIBs to the Hotel, take the APC and Vondiks and the APC to the alley way or do simply bum-rush the city entrance as normal. On Jalalabad the US can go for the city entrance, or flank and try and take the Hotel, junk yard or fountain. Karkand has no room for flanking and no room for strategy.

Wake with an osprey troop transport would be good.

More Vehicle classes.

Better Physics. (Hate it when I jump a ramp in a jeep; at speed; and it just smacks straight down into the ground).

Sounds improvements.

Limit jumping like COD to avoid manic bunny hoppers.

Smoke nades need improving.

Claymores should be destroyed when shot. (Its up to the sniper to hide them better).