Pages: 1 2
None of which have been elected to office.Lotta_Drool wrote:
Cease Fire = Hamas ran out of rockets, money, and people. Don't worry kiddies, it usually only takes a year for them to get reloaded and reorganized.
Besides, there are more groups than hamas that want Israel destroyed.
Oh how I long for the days of Yassar Arafat, now there was a terrorist you could make peace with.Spark wrote:
None of which have been elected to office.Lotta_Drool wrote:
Cease Fire = Hamas ran out of rockets, money, and people. Don't worry kiddies, it usually only takes a year for them to get reloaded and reorganized.
Besides, there are more groups than hamas that want Israel destroyed.
This is Israel acknowledging that the game has changed.
its known as RETALIATION, maybe the Zio-Nazi's shouldn't have killed the 2 "Militants" in the west bank, again the Zio-Nazi's wants to be seen as the "victim"Lotta_Drool wrote:
JERUSALEM — Palestinian militants on Tuesday fired three homemade rockets into southern Israel, the first such attack since a cease-fire between Israel and Gaza militants took effect last week.
Israel condemned the attack as a "gross violation" of the truce, but did not say whether it would retaliate.
The barrage wounded two people and capped a day of violence that presented the truce with its first serious test.
Just before midnight, Palestinian militants fired a mortar shell into an empty area in southern Israel. And in a pre-dawn raid, Israeli troops killed two Palestinians in the West Bank city of Nablus.
Islamic Jihad, a small armed group backed by Syria and Iran, claimed responsibility for the rocket fire. Although the West Bank is not included in the truce, the group said the Nablus raid had soured the atmosphere of calm.
According to what he wrote it's because the Palestinians fired a mortar shell. So in essence they started it. So the 2 militants is infact the retaliation, and then the rocket fire is retaliation to the retaliation.rammunition wrote:
its known as RETALIATION, maybe the Zio-Nazi's shouldn't have killed the 2 "Militants" in the west bank, again the Zio-Nazi's wants to be seen as the "victim"Lotta_Drool wrote:
JERUSALEM — Palestinian militants on Tuesday fired three homemade rockets into southern Israel, the first such attack since a cease-fire between Israel and Gaza militants took effect last week.
Israel condemned the attack as a "gross violation" of the truce, but did not say whether it would retaliate.
The barrage wounded two people and capped a day of violence that presented the truce with its first serious test.
Just before midnight, Palestinian militants fired a mortar shell into an empty area in southern Israel. And in a pre-dawn raid, Israeli troops killed two Palestinians in the West Bank city of Nablus.
Islamic Jihad, a small armed group backed by Syria and Iran, claimed responsibility for the rocket fire. Although the West Bank is not included in the truce, the group said the Nablus raid had soured the atmosphere of calm.
Hamas, the main Palestinian faction in Gaza, has urged all sides to respect the ceasefire, hopefully all will ands its just the one isolated caseMek-Stizzle wrote:
According to what he wrote it's because the Palestinians fired a mortar shell. So in essence they started it. So the 2 militants is infact the retaliation, and then the rocket fire is retaliation to the retaliation.rammunition wrote:
its known as RETALIATION, maybe the Zio-Nazi's shouldn't have killed the 2 "Militants" in the west bank, again the Zio-Nazi's wants to be seen as the "victim"Lotta_Drool wrote:
JERUSALEM — Palestinian militants on Tuesday fired three homemade rockets into southern Israel, the first such attack since a cease-fire between Israel and Gaza militants took effect last week.
Israel condemned the attack as a "gross violation" of the truce, but did not say whether it would retaliate.
The barrage wounded two people and capped a day of violence that presented the truce with its first serious test.
Just before midnight, Palestinian militants fired a mortar shell into an empty area in southern Israel. And in a pre-dawn raid, Israeli troops killed two Palestinians in the West Bank city of Nablus.
Islamic Jihad, a small armed group backed by Syria and Iran, claimed responsibility for the rocket fire. Although the West Bank is not included in the truce, the group said the Nablus raid had soured the atmosphere of calm.
So how long did it last then? How many days was that?
Or, maybe, just maybe it'll be an isolated incident.
Last edited by rammunition (2008-06-24 10:56:15)
The truce involved Gaza not the West Bank. Its hard to find diplomatic solution when one side has no idea/control of what their own members do.rammunition wrote:
its known as RETALIATION, maybe the Zio-Nazi's shouldn't have killed the 2 "Militants" in the west bank, again the Zio-Nazi's wants to be seen as the "victim"Lotta_Drool wrote:
JERUSALEM — Palestinian militants on Tuesday fired three homemade rockets into southern Israel, the first such attack since a cease-fire between Israel and Gaza militants took effect last week.
Israel condemned the attack as a "gross violation" of the truce, but did not say whether it would retaliate.
The barrage wounded two people and capped a day of violence that presented the truce with its first serious test.
Just before midnight, Palestinian militants fired a mortar shell into an empty area in southern Israel. And in a pre-dawn raid, Israeli troops killed two Palestinians in the West Bank city of Nablus.
Islamic Jihad, a small armed group backed by Syria and Iran, claimed responsibility for the rocket fire. Although the West Bank is not included in the truce, the group said the Nablus raid had soured the atmosphere of calm.
we know it was the west bank but "Islamc Jihad" members were killed in the west bank, some are located in Gaza and they said they fired back as retaliationrawls2 wrote:
The truce involved Gaza not the West Bank. Its hard to find diplomatic solution when one side has no idea/control of what their own members do.rammunition wrote:
its known as RETALIATION, maybe the Zio-Nazi's shouldn't have killed the 2 "Militants" in the west bank, again the Zio-Nazi's wants to be seen as the "victim"Lotta_Drool wrote:
JERUSALEM — Palestinian militants on Tuesday fired three homemade rockets into southern Israel, the first such attack since a cease-fire between Israel and Gaza militants took effect last week.
Israel condemned the attack as a "gross violation" of the truce, but did not say whether it would retaliate.
The barrage wounded two people and capped a day of violence that presented the truce with its first serious test.
Just before midnight, Palestinian militants fired a mortar shell into an empty area in southern Israel. And in a pre-dawn raid, Israeli troops killed two Palestinians in the West Bank city of Nablus.
Islamic Jihad, a small armed group backed by Syria and Iran, claimed responsibility for the rocket fire. Although the West Bank is not included in the truce, the group said the Nablus raid had soured the atmosphere of calm.
And you see nothing wrong with this?rammunition wrote:
we know it was the west bank but "Islamc Jihad" members were killed in the west bank, some are located in Gaza and they said they fired back as retaliationrawls2 wrote:
The truce involved Gaza not the West Bank. Its hard to find diplomatic solution when one side has no idea/control of what their own members do.rammunition wrote:
its known as RETALIATION, maybe the Zio-Nazi's shouldn't have killed the 2 "Militants" in the west bank, again the Zio-Nazi's wants to be seen as the "victim"
Considering the phrasing in your sentence, do you really want or expect anyone to take you seriously? I mean, I never have, but wouldn't you want someone to?rammunition wrote:
its known as RETALIATION, maybe the Zio-Nazi's shouldn't have killed the 2 "Militants" in the west bank, again the Zio-Nazi's wants to be seen as the "victim"Lotta_Drool wrote:
JERUSALEM — Palestinian militants on Tuesday fired three homemade rockets into southern Israel, the first such attack since a cease-fire between Israel and Gaza militants took effect last week.
Israel condemned the attack as a "gross violation" of the truce, but did not say whether it would retaliate.
The barrage wounded two people and capped a day of violence that presented the truce with its first serious test.
Just before midnight, Palestinian militants fired a mortar shell into an empty area in southern Israel. And in a pre-dawn raid, Israeli troops killed two Palestinians in the West Bank city of Nablus.
Islamic Jihad, a small armed group backed by Syria and Iran, claimed responsibility for the rocket fire. Although the West Bank is not included in the truce, the group said the Nablus raid had soured the atmosphere of calm.
And why didn't they retaliate in the West Bank...where the "offense" occurred? And, BTW, where there isn't a brand-new truce to violate...rammunition wrote:
we know it was the west bank but "Islamc Jihad" members were killed in the west bank, some are located in Gaza and they said they fired back as retaliationrawls2 wrote:
The truce involved Gaza not the West Bank. Its hard to find diplomatic solution when one side has no idea/control of what their own members do.rammunition wrote:
its known as RETALIATION, maybe the Zio-Nazi's shouldn't have killed the 2 "Militants" in the west bank, again the Zio-Nazi's wants to be seen as the "victim"
Pages: 1 2