Pug wrote:
Masques wrote:
Pug wrote:
I think you're overstating the facts.
This is not credible at all.
I know there are many people here who are non-plussed at comments calling for the destruction of Islam or Arabs, but MANY posters on here have been called Anti-Semites for even mild criticism of Israeli foreign policy. McCain seeks out the endorsement of a man blaming the Holocaust on Jews and another calling for the same treatment of Muslims and yet...nary a peep out of some here.
I'm not debating the endorsement's merits. Endorsements always have a dark side. I'm referring to the idea that McCain = Hitler.
I agree that McCain, though his ideas are outmoded, is probably not racist or bigoted.
But which is worse, someone who is openly bigoted or someone who, while not bigoted, panders to and stokes such sentiments to get a vote? I'm thinking of both Clinton and McCain here.