CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6971

lowing wrote:

Varegg wrote:

Believe it or not lowing but special interest groups are here to stay and i don't really mind ... it really needs to be this way also, different people have different needs ...
Yeah, some more than others apparently. Fuck that
Yeah that AIPAC is really something.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7173|Argentina

lowing wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

lowing's obsession with pointed minor news stories regarding Islam betrays an irrational lack of objectivity.
Another 30 pages Islam Appeasement thread shows...
Like I told Braddock, feel free to join in or not.......
The thread or your crusade against evil Islam?
Braddock
Agitator
+916|6706|Éire

Braddock wrote:

lowing wrote:

Both points would be well recieved if in fact these stories were far and few between and almost impossible to find with a google search. Unfortunately that is not the case. The fact is all ya gotta do is type the word Islam and there ya go. Funny how articles about how enlightening Islam is are the ones that are hard to find.   But yeah, I am making it all up.
Type 'evil america' into Google and see what happens lowing.
If you really want a giggle at your Google argument type in 'israeli heavy handedness' and see what comes up first!
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7067|USA

Braddock wrote:

lowing wrote:

Both points would be well recieved if in fact these stories were far and few between and almost impossible to find with a google search. Unfortunately that is not the case. The fact is all ya gotta do is type the word Islam and there ya go. Funny how articles about how enlightening Islam is are the ones that are hard to find.   But yeah, I am making it all up.
Type 'evil america' into Google and see what happens lowing.
a point would be made if it were EVIL Islam that was typed in. Again ya don't have to get that specific
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7173|Argentina

CameronPoe wrote:

lowing wrote:

Varegg wrote:

Believe it or not lowing but special interest groups are here to stay and i don't really mind ... it really needs to be this way also, different people have different needs ...
Yeah, some more than others apparently. Fuck that
Yeah that AIPAC is really something.
Anti-Semite!!!!!! /sarcasm
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6971
Type 'torture america' into google.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6971
It's official - reality should be interpreted in terms of google hit counts.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7173|Argentina

lowing wrote:

Braddock wrote:

lowing wrote:

Both points would be well recieved if in fact these stories were far and few between and almost impossible to find with a google search. Unfortunately that is not the case. The fact is all ya gotta do is type the word Islam and there ya go. Funny how articles about how enlightening Islam is are the ones that are hard to find.   But yeah, I am making it all up.
Type 'evil america' into Google and see what happens lowing.
a point would be made if it were EVIL Islam that was typed in. Again ya don't have to get that specific
Ah, my ole good friend Lowing.  You confuse things.  It's not appeasement to respect other people's beliefs, it's being civilized.  If some Muslims feel offended with certain things, that are NOT important to your way of life, then don't do them.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7173|Argentina

CameronPoe wrote:

It's official - reality should be interpreted in terms of google hit counts.
Type asian chicks porn.  I've been told there are thousands of pages.

/gets back to his porn
Braddock
Agitator
+916|6706|Éire

lowing wrote:

Braddock wrote:

lowing wrote:

Both points would be well recieved if in fact these stories were far and few between and almost impossible to find with a google search. Unfortunately that is not the case. The fact is all ya gotta do is type the word Islam and there ya go. Funny how articles about how enlightening Islam is are the ones that are hard to find.   But yeah, I am making it all up.
Type 'evil america' into Google and see what happens lowing.
a point would be made if it were EVIL Islam that was typed in. Again ya don't have to get that specific
A little experiment...

I just typed 'Islam' into Google and I had to go to page 5 of the search results before I got a site raising negative issues about Islam (your beloved http://www.islam-watch.org/).

I typed in 'America' and I only had to go to the third page of search results to find a website about 'the lies of the Bush administration' (www.americablog.com).

By your methodology America is more evil than Islam because it's easier to find evil stories on Google using vague searches.

Last edited by Braddock (2008-04-04 04:43:20)

lowing
Banned
+1,662|7067|USA

sergeriver wrote:

lowing wrote:

sergeriver wrote:


Another 30 pages Islam Appeasement thread shows...
Like I told Braddock, feel free to join in or not.......
The thread or your crusade against evil Islam?
Not on a crusade to do anything except point out the flaws and inconsistencies and denial in your posts. I have a much easier time proving these things with articles and facts then you do defending them, with much more than your own personal opinions.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7067|USA

sergeriver wrote:

lowing wrote:

Braddock wrote:


Type 'evil america' into Google and see what happens lowing.
a point would be made if it were EVIL Islam that was typed in. Again ya don't have to get that specific
Ah, my ole good friend Lowing.  You confuse things.  It's not appeasement to respect other people's beliefs, it's being civilized.  If some Muslims feel offended with certain things, that are NOT important to your way of life, then don't do them.
be careful Serge your back is gunna break from bending over backwards to kiss all that ass.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7173|Argentina

lowing wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

lowing wrote:


Like I told Braddock, feel free to join in or not.......
The thread or your crusade against evil Islam?
Not on a crusade to do anything except point out the flaws and inconsistencies and denial in your posts. I have a much easier time proving these things with articles and facts then you do defending them, with much more than your own personal opinions.
Not my opinion, but the opinion of billions in the world who "appease" Islam because they aren't Islamophobes.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7067|USA

Braddock wrote:

lowing wrote:

Braddock wrote:


Type 'evil america' into Google and see what happens lowing.
a point would be made if it were EVIL Islam that was typed in. Again ya don't have to get that specific
A little experiment...

I just typed 'Islam' into Google and I had to go to page 5 of the search results before I got a site raising negative issues about Islam (your beloved http://www.islam-watch.org/).

I typed in 'America' and I only had to go to the third page of search results to find a website about 'the lies of the Bush administration' (www.americablog.com).

By your methodology America is more evil than Islam because it's easier to find evil stories on Google using vague searches.
And by your logic all I have to do to defend America is accuse you of generalizing, and say all you are reading are isolated incedents, and it does not affect you so don't worry about it.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7173|Argentina

lowing wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

lowing wrote:


a point would be made if it were EVIL Islam that was typed in. Again ya don't have to get that specific
Ah, my ole good friend Lowing.  You confuse things.  It's not appeasement to respect other people's beliefs, it's being civilized.  If some Muslims feel offended with certain things, that are NOT important to your way of life, then don't do them.
be careful Serge your back is gunna break from bending over backwards to kiss all that ass.
Lol.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|7067|USA

sergeriver wrote:

lowing wrote:

sergeriver wrote:


The thread or your crusade against evil Islam?
Not on a crusade to do anything except point out the flaws and inconsistencies and denial in your posts. I have a much easier time proving these things with articles and facts then you do defending them, with much more than your own personal opinions.
Not my opinion, but the opinion of billions in the world who "appease" Islam because they aren't Islamophobes.
As long as you finally admit that they are being appeased, now it is just a matter of arguing the right or wrong of it, isn't it? You go first.
Braddock
Agitator
+916|6706|Éire

lowing wrote:

Braddock wrote:

lowing wrote:


a point would be made if it were EVIL Islam that was typed in. Again ya don't have to get that specific
A little experiment...

I just typed 'Islam' into Google and I had to go to page 5 of the search results before I got a site raising negative issues about Islam (your beloved http://www.islam-watch.org/).

I typed in 'America' and I only had to go to the third page of search results to find a website about 'the lies of the Bush administration' (www.americablog.com).

By your methodology America is more evil than Islam because it's easier to find evil stories on Google using vague searches.
And by your logic all I have to do to defend America is accuse you of generalizing, and say all you are reading are isolated incedents, and it does not affect you so don't worry about it.
So when it's stories about America misbehaving they are generalisations and to be disregarded but when it's about Islam it's a vivid and coherent portrait of the reality of Islam in everyday Western life? ...Riiiiight.

Lowing, I don't just visit anti-American sites and rush out and construct my opinions based on what I glean from them. I allow myself to be open to various forms of news, left-wing, right-wing and centre... then I apply a big dose of common sense and objectivity and then when I'm done I still hold my hand up and acknowledge that it's still only MY opinion. You claimed that the 'threat' of Islam was somehow proven by how easy it was to find negative stories about Islam on Google... I just proved that idea is preposterous and could be applied to any outlandish idea.

To further test it type in evil mother theresa
B.Schuss
I'm back, baby... ( sort of )
+664|7257|Cologne, Germany

lowing wrote:

Both points would be well recieved if in fact these stories were far and few between and almost impossible to find with a google search. Unfortunately that is not the case. The fact is all ya gotta do is type the word Islam and there ya go. Funny how articles about how enlightening Islam is are the ones that are hard to find.   But yeah, I am making it all up.
no one said that. It's the conclusions that you draw that trouble us. We simply don't think they're accurate.

Furthermore, you have offered no alternative that would be consistent with current legislation regarding freedom of religion and discrimination.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|7173|Argentina

lowing wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

lowing wrote:


Not on a crusade to do anything except point out the flaws and inconsistencies and denial in your posts. I have a much easier time proving these things with articles and facts then you do defending them, with much more than your own personal opinions.
Not my opinion, but the opinion of billions in the world who "appease" Islam because they aren't Islamophobes.
As long as you finally admit that they are being appeased, now it is just a matter of arguing the right or wrong of it, isn't it? You go first.
Ok, I'll try buddy. 

If appeasement means:
-to respect other people beliefs
-not to offend those beliefs
-to make small concessions in order to achieve a better mutual understanding
Then I'm an appeaser and I find this to be Ok.
Braddock
Agitator
+916|6706|Éire

B.Schuss wrote:

lowing wrote:

Both points would be well recieved if in fact these stories were far and few between and almost impossible to find with a google search. Unfortunately that is not the case. The fact is all ya gotta do is type the word Islam and there ya go. Funny how articles about how enlightening Islam is are the ones that are hard to find.   But yeah, I am making it all up.
no one said that. It's the conclusions that you draw that trouble us. We simply don't think they're accurate.

Furthermore, you have offered no alternative that would be consistent with current legislation regarding freedom of religion and discrimination.
I don't think there is any reasoning with lowing on this issue. Just read what he says here about Google, it's complete nonsense. I tested him on it and found five pages of pro-Islam sites before getting to a negative site (his favourite website islam-watch.org). He says 'it's "Funny how articles about how enlightening Islam is are the ones that are hard to find" when in fact you have to trawl through five pages of them before you get to get to a negative one!

He does make one true statement though... "But yeah, I am making it all up."
David.P
Banned
+649|6690
Lowing man just give up. It doesn't matter who's right or wrong here, Just who has the most people whining on their side.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6971

David.P wrote:

Lowing man just give up. It doesn't matter who's right or wrong here, Just who has the most people whining on their side.
Stop whining.
JahManRed
wank
+646|7044|IRELAND

David.P wrote:

Lowing man just give up. It doesn't matter who's right or wrong here, Just who has the most people whining on their side.
I take it your stepping up then..............
David.P
Banned
+649|6690

CameronPoe wrote:

David.P wrote:

Lowing man just give up. It doesn't matter who's right or wrong here, Just who has the most people whining on their side.
Stop whining.
About your Whining?
Varegg
Support fanatic :-)
+2,206|7226|Nårvei

Don't you find it funny lowing that the only one that supports your view on this forum is yourself ? ... doesn't that strike you at all ?
Wait behind the line ..............................................................

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard