seals would probably have like 3 casualties
Poll
100 seals vs 100 sas. who would win?
| seals | 51% | 51% - 58 | ||||
| sas | 48% | 48% - 54 | ||||
| Total: 112 | ||||||
Seals, SAS are nothing compared to them.
ban
no uMek-Izzle wrote:
ban
Three seal casualties? Poor seals
ThaReaper wrote:
no uMek-Izzle wrote:
ban
...way to hijack...firebolt5 wrote:
Three seal casualties? Poor seals
http://www.hickerphoto.com/data/media/4 … _T3542.jpg
smartdude992 wrote:
...way to hijack...firebolt5 wrote:
Three seal casualties? Poor seals
http://www.hickerphoto.com/data/media/4 … _T3542.jpg
SEALS vs SBS would be been better. They're more similar.
SBS would have like no casualties.
SBS would have like no casualties.
I'm not qualified to make that decision, not even a guess tbh
This is too hard, and I'm getting tired of the topics . (I say they both exterminate eachother!)
This is too hard, and I'm getting tired of the topics . (I say they both exterminate eachother!)
inane little opines
sas
As usual, another biased thread.
I don't see what's so funny about people killing helpless seals. Can you stay on topic.Mek-Izzle wrote:
http://babyseals.ytmnd.com/
Would be close. Depends on the situation. SAS are more leaned towards Hostage situations, in close quarters environments, while SEALs are trained for... just fighting, without as much skill in the way of protecting the lives of innocents. Both are very well trained, but SEALs are more adapted for a force vs. force battle, not as much hostage situations.
Anyone in UK now turn TV to ITV4. SAS the soldiers story is on.
what he said.specops10-4 wrote:
Would be close. Depends on the situation. SAS are more leaned towards Hostage situations, in close quarters environments, while SEALs are trained for... just fighting, without as much skill in the way of protecting the lives of innocents. Both are very well trained, but SEALs are more adapted for a force vs. force battle, not as much hostage situations.
I made a question on yahoo answers. Lets see what the people of yahoo think.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index … gr_status=
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index … gr_status=
are you kidding? seals are trained for EVERYTHING. no?specops10-4 wrote:
Would be close. Depends on the situation. SAS are more leaned towards Hostage situations, in close quarters environments, while SEALs are trained for... just fighting, without as much skill in the way of protecting the lives of innocents. Both are very well trained, but SEALs are more adapted for a force vs. force battle, not as much hostage situations.
do they cook foodz good?ig wrote:
are you kidding? seals are trained for EVERYTHING. no?specops10-4 wrote:
Would be close. Depends on the situation. SAS are more leaned towards Hostage situations, in close quarters environments, while SEALs are trained for... just fighting, without as much skill in the way of protecting the lives of innocents. Both are very well trained, but SEALs are more adapted for a force vs. force battle, not as much hostage situations.
So's pretty much every special forces. If anyone actually knows shit all about the SAS they know they do all sorts of missions.ig wrote:
are you kidding? seals are trained for EVERYTHING. no?specops10-4 wrote:
Would be close. Depends on the situation. SAS are more leaned towards Hostage situations, in close quarters environments, while SEALs are trained for... just fighting, without as much skill in the way of protecting the lives of innocents. Both are very well trained, but SEALs are more adapted for a force vs. force battle, not as much hostage situations.
i hate when people compare SF units. it is too situational.
who would win, spiderman or superman?
who would win, spiderman or superman?
Superman, because he can fly and is super strong.CoronadoSEAL wrote:
i hate when people compare SF units. it is too situational.
who would win, spiderman or superman?
No, SAS are trained on combat missions in the open aswell, just generally for tight situations or missions with small groups.specops10-4 wrote:
Would be close. Depends on the situation. SAS are more leaned towards Hostage situations, in close quarters environments, while SEALs are trained for... just fighting, without as much skill in the way of protecting the lives of innocents. Both are very well trained, but SEALs are more adapted for a force vs. force battle, not as much hostage situations.
inane little opines
superman no contestCoronadoSEAL wrote:
i hate when people compare SF units. it is too situational.
who would win, spiderman or superman?