What guns do SAS use HK G3 G36 family and MP family?
Last edited by †[AøT]§tèálth† (2008-03-16 14:10:37)
Engineers mate...we tunnel faster than them spec ops can catch us rofl!Magpie wrote:
Bet you guys liked itdaddyofdeath wrote:
No, we didn't mate. They fucked us up!Mek-Izzle wrote:
You kicked their arse right!
get in there
well, since you have a book.†[AøT]§tèálth† wrote:
No i have a book that they give the Spetznas it tells you all the tactics, combat manuvers etc etc.
Ah, I see. Thanks for clarifying.dayarath wrote:
I ment, that how it was supposed to be hadn't come into effect just there, the people in the SS at that time were just regular grown ups with SF training, not the kids raised to be soldiers idea - that would've come about 10 years later.Poseidon wrote:
What? There were 39 divisions of Waffen-SS troops fighting in battle.
Why do you think when the SS "surrendered", our soldiers just shot them on sight most of the time? They knew nothing else besides how to kill. They were trained not to give up no matter what and if they tried to make them POWs...well, it wouldn't go too good.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
I wouldnt say the SS were incredible soldiers. They were just pretty well trained and disciplined. Our regular army units were defeating them in WW2.
I read hustler earlier. I am a pornstar......? **HIGH 5**jord wrote:
So that equals being in the Spetnaz?†[AøT]§tèálth† wrote:
No i have a book that they give the Spetznas it tells you all the tactics, combat manuvers etc etc.
So lets see then.
I'm Richard Hammond, A former SBS soldier, an SAS soldier, A comedian, British and American going by the books I've read.
Well you're the expert you tell us!†[AøT]§tèálth† wrote:
What guns do SAS use HK G3 G36 family and MP family?
needs moar kitty02fxnmaurer wrote:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=%2Fnews%2F2003%2F12%2F16%2Fwshoot16.xml
tlkin of guns ...check tht out !
†[AøT]§tèálth† wrote:
What guns do SAS use HK G3 G36 family and MP family?
these are but a few, for anti-terror missions in buildings.
inane little opines
Yeah but if you look at maps between 1700's to 2000's you'll seen almost every country was atleast controlled by a European country mostly France, Germany, Britain, and Belgium. Germany, Britain, and France even had parts of China once.
I also read FHM. I am Hillary Duff as well as all the above.daddyofdeath wrote:
I read hustler earlier. I am a pornstar......? **HIGH 5**jord wrote:
So that equals being in the Spetnaz?†[AøT]§tèálth† wrote:
No i have a book that they give the Spetznas it tells you all the tactics, combat manuvers etc etc.
So lets see then.
I'm Richard Hammond, A former SBS soldier, an SAS soldier, A comedian, British and American going by the books I've read.
thats not the reason. The SS were the military arm behind the holocaust. They were also notorious for killing POW's. Its not because they were considered super duper. They were better equipped with a different TOE (Table of Organization and Equipment) compared to their wermacht counter parts
Belgium?†[AøT]§tèálth† wrote:
Yeah but if you look at maps between 1700's to 2000's you'll seen almost every country was atleast controlled by a European country mostly France, Germany, Britain, and Belgium. Germany, Britain, and France even had parts of China once.
read some more books.
Belgium controlled Rwanda and some Africa countries.^*AlphA*^ wrote:
Belgium?†[AøT]§tèálth† wrote:
Yeah but if you look at maps between 1700's to 2000's you'll seen almost every country was atleast controlled by a European country mostly France, Germany, Britain, and Belgium. Germany, Britain, and France even had parts of China once.
read some more books.
Not that it matters or has anything to do with anything said. Other than his pathetic Europe rant post.^*AlphA*^ wrote:
Belgium?†[AøT]§tèálth† wrote:
Yeah but if you look at maps between 1700's to 2000's you'll seen almost every country was atleast controlled by a European country mostly France, Germany, Britain, and Belgium. Germany, Britain, and France even had parts of China once.
read some more books.
lol...wonder what it's like being the opposition to the SAS, even if its just an excercise...daddyofdeath wrote:
Engineers mate...we tunnel faster than them spec ops can catch us rofl!Magpie wrote:
Bet you guys liked itdaddyofdeath wrote:
No, we didn't mate. They fucked us up!
indeed, poseidon what you're saying is what they would theoretically become if nazi germany lasted a few years longer.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
thats not the reason. The SS were the military arm behind the holocaust. They were also notorious for killing POW's. Its not because they were considered super duper. They were better equipped with a different TOE (Table of Organization and Equipment) compared to their wermacht counter parts
inane little opines
uh...^*AlphA*^ wrote:
Belgium?†[AøT]§tèálth† wrote:
Yeah but if you look at maps between 1700's to 2000's you'll seen almost every country was atleast controlled by a European country mostly France, Germany, Britain, and Belgium. Germany, Britain, and France even had parts of China once.
read some more books.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belgian_colonial_empire
We're lacking some vital information here, but considering it's about an area the size of Birma, we shall assume it IS Birma. That means lots'O jungle to hide in. I think the SAS are far better trained for such an environment and would also be more able in utilizing the available resources, not taken into account that the marines would deplete their given resources much much much faster as well (nothing was said about unlimited food). On top of that, finding 100 men in the jungle of Birma is alot harder than finding an entire (famished) Marine Corps. The SAS just waits and harasses, while the Marines see their morale drop and will eventually be forced to eat eachother
Must be an awesome sight to see you try, too bad I can't find a million SAS soldiers, especially not a million that would find you worth wasting their time.†[AøT]§tèálth† wrote:
SAS is just wannabes i could take out 1million SAS soldiers with my bare hands...
He has that Spetsnaz handbook so he does not need any other books its frekkin l33t^*AlphA*^ wrote:
Belgium?†[AøT]§tèálth† wrote:
Yeah but if you look at maps between 1700's to 2000's you'll seen almost every country was atleast controlled by a European country mostly France, Germany, Britain, and Belgium. Germany, Britain, and France even had parts of China once.
read some more books.
Ruthlessness in combat as well I supposeGunSlinger OIF II wrote:
thats not the reason. The SS were the military arm behind the holocaust. They were also notorious for killing POW's. Its not because they were considered super duper. They were better equipped with a different TOE (Table of Organization and Equipment) compared to their wermacht counter parts
I happen to believe that Japanese soldiers were more to fear than the SS during WW2dayarath wrote:
indeed, poseidon what you're saying is what they would theoretically become if nazi germany lasted a few years longer.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
thats not the reason. The SS were the military arm behind the holocaust. They were also notorious for killing POW's. Its not because they were considered super duper. They were better equipped with a different TOE (Table of Organization and Equipment) compared to their wermacht counter parts
if your not ruthless in modern warfare, you end up losing.M.O.A.B wrote:
Ruthlessness in combat as well I supposeGunSlinger OIF II wrote:
thats not the reason. The SS were the military arm behind the holocaust. They were also notorious for killing POW's. Its not because they were considered super duper. They were better equipped with a different TOE (Table of Organization and Equipment) compared to their wermacht counter parts
Thanks to indoctrination from boyhood, yes. those japanese were crazy, lunatics.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
I happen to believe that Japanese soldiers were more to fear than the SS during WW2dayarath wrote:
indeed, poseidon what you're saying is what they would theoretically become if nazi germany lasted a few years longer.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
thats not the reason. The SS were the military arm behind the holocaust. They were also notorious for killing POW's. Its not because they were considered super duper. They were better equipped with a different TOE (Table of Organization and Equipment) compared to their wermacht counter parts
inane little opines
I think their ORBAT meant that some of the SS were front line assault units and also rear elements of einsatzgruppen (basically killing squads). So they were fighting at the front and murdering innocent civilians at the rear. They definitely rotated during R&R periods so at some stage its fair to say that at some point each SS division had a good hand in combat and murdering duties.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
thats not the reason. The SS were the military arm behind the holocaust. They were also notorious for killing POW's. Its not because they were considered super duper. They were better equipped with a different TOE (Table of Organization and Equipment) compared to their wermacht counter parts