I find it funny how they are trying to compete against WoW, then they hire/access Blizzard. Didn't Blizzard make WoW? ...
Pages: 1 2
- Index »
- Games »
- Call of Duty Series »
- Activision May Be Considering A Massively Multiplayer Call Of Duty
It doesn't matter which era the game is going to be set in, at least for me.
As long as the game combines the aspect of Call of Duty for its weapons platform and hit-regs, combined with BF style vehicles and objective oriented gameplay.
As long as the game combines the aspect of Call of Duty for its weapons platform and hit-regs, combined with BF style vehicles and objective oriented gameplay.
it will be tried with a game called Huxley.
Korean developers.Reciprocity wrote:
it will be tried with a game called Huxley.
I felt bad that I didn't know anything about this game until now, since I am Korean myself.
wtf is a MMOFPS? is it a server with hundreds of people instead of say 32 or 64 players?
i dont see why everyone hates modern warfare
personally i think WWII is over played
id like to see a pacific campaign
personally i think WWII is over played
id like to see a pacific campaign
lagg party here i comeB00MH3ADSH0T wrote:
wtf is a MMOFPS? is it a server with hundreds of people instead of say 32 or 64 players?
Last edited by henno13 (2008-03-07 09:23:07)
Fuck MMORPG (or is it FPS) games. Actually an MMORPG that is FOR ONCE not about Wizards/Sci-Fi and shit would be nice
Last edited by Mek-Izzle (2008-03-07 09:46:10)
what about WWI
?!?!! trench fight ftw
?!?!! trench fight ftw
Very interesting concept, but I dont see how it will work out... 4 teams or 2 teams each 10000people on one big map?
Yeah seriously, can someone make a MMO that isnt fucking retarded for once? Im tired of sci fi and retarded shit.
..I'm glad I'm not the only one thinking that.B00MH3ADSH0T wrote:
wtf is a MMOFPS? is it a server with hundreds of people instead of say 32 or 64 players?
I don't see how this'll work.
Call of War
EDIT: i think that kinda sounds like a good game really
EDIT: i think that kinda sounds like a good game really
Last edited by elite3444 (2008-03-07 13:46:43)
I'd have some of that. There is a WW2 MMPORPG Battleground Europe or WW2 On-line. I've got a copy somehere, hardly played it but you could spend half a day in a truck just to get 2 sections of action before being shot by a sniper or something. It paid close attention to historic detail, and required significant investment.
Bah, didn't they say the developers were thinking about canceling it? Only game to "compete" with a FPS/RPG game is Borderlands, which looks pretty cool...Reciprocity wrote:
it will be tried with a game called Huxley.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borderlands_(video_game)
http://borderlandsthegame.com/home.htm
It'd probably be like Battlefield Heroes.
There's a virtual map of the large scale war, and its broken down into tiny matches between 30 players or something.
There's a virtual map of the large scale war, and its broken down into tiny matches between 30 players or something.
World of War two
Warcraft of DutyYmon wrote:
World of War two
Ever DutyLittle BaBy JESUS wrote:
Warcraft of DutyYmon wrote:
World of War two
It's either going to be CoD with a better character system, or complete shit. FPSs dont make good MMO foundations.
Pages: 1 2
- Index »
- Games »
- Call of Duty Series »
- Activision May Be Considering A Massively Multiplayer Call Of Duty