view from the open drivers hatch
my old gunner on my track
my old gunner on my track
Last edited by GunSlinger OIF II (2008-02-11 20:30:07)
Good pictures.
GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
You dont need to see his identification...bennisboy wrote:
You're PSYOP? What special mind powers do you have?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
Now that im PSYOP, im stuck on a humvee.
Seriously though, this thread has gone on long enough.
/Close.
the previous post is made of win, truth, and ability to crush armored vehicles and cars which try to fuck with it.
http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/sh … y+accident
I like the Bradley... it fits it's purpose as an IFV supporting troops... Same as the Warrior. They aren't true APCs... they have bigger guns. But the M2's auto cannon beats the shit out of the AA thing the Warrior has. lol
I like the Bradley... it fits it's purpose as an IFV supporting troops... Same as the Warrior. They aren't true APCs... they have bigger guns. But the M2's auto cannon beats the shit out of the AA thing the Warrior has. lol
Strykers are also good
But i do love the bushmaster chaingun
But i do love the bushmaster chaingun
that first picture was just slack though, they said he was stealing wood so they crushed it. but that taxi was the guys only source of money.rdx-fx wrote:
Someone order a squished car?Ashlite wrote:
the previous post is made of win, truth, and ability to crush armored vehicles and cars which try to fuck with it.
http://www.vlar.net/bf2s/A_024.jpg
And, in the interest of being Fair & Balanced
http://www.vlar.net/bf2s/A_064.jpg
HBO produced a sort of humorous movie about the Bradley's development, it's called The Pentagon Wars.
it's probably very hard to find.
it's probably very hard to find.
Last edited by Reciprocity (2008-02-12 00:25:06)
Its based on a book and real events. Very good read.Reciprocity wrote:
HBO produced a sort of humorous movie about the Bradley's development, it's called The Pentagon Wars.
it's probably very hard to find.
Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2008-02-12 00:30:05)
This thread is awesome.
How did this just suddenly appear overnight?
How did this just suddenly appear overnight?
i know, lots of cool things happen on bf2s when your away for like 10 minsLucien wrote:
This thread is awesome.
How did this just suddenly appear overnight?
I loved to drive Bradleys in BF2.
Both win tbh
About Abrams tanks,
Why does the loader need a machine gun at the top? Is it just for the sake of increasing firepower? I know sometimes they can have the bullet-resistant-window-things, and that sometimes it's radio-controlled, but it seems kinda risky letting the loader expose himself
Idonno
Why does the loader need a machine gun at the top? Is it just for the sake of increasing firepower? I know sometimes they can have the bullet-resistant-window-things, and that sometimes it's radio-controlled, but it seems kinda risky letting the loader expose himself
Idonno
.50 cal fired from these guns make quick work out of infantry in front and behind the tank. usefull for when the main gun is pointed at something else, sure there is a machinegun next to the main gun aswell, but this one points at exactly the same target as the main gun. The tank's turret can't rotate and aim at targets too quickly, so when you need some quick, good powerfull fire support; you get the machineguns on top. Also for protecting the tanks hiny, most vulnerable usually because the radars cant' sense shit behind them.Mek-Izzle wrote:
About Abrams tanks,
Why does the loader need a machine gun at the top? Is it just for the sake of increasing firepower? I know sometimes they can have the bullet-resistant-window-things, and that sometimes it's radio-controlled, but it seems kinda risky letting the loader expose himself
Idonno
inane little opines
How about a camera on the gun? So it will be like a humvee.dayarath wrote:
.50 cal fired from these guns make quick work out of infantry in front and behind the tank. usefull for when the main gun is pointed at something else, sure there is a machinegun next to the main gun aswell, but this one points at exactly the same target as the main gun. The tank's turret can't rotate and aim at targets too quickly, so when you need some quick, good powerfull fire support; you get the machineguns on top. Also for protecting the tanks hiny, most vulnerable usually because the radars cant' sense shit behind them.Mek-Izzle wrote:
About Abrams tanks,
Why does the loader need a machine gun at the top? Is it just for the sake of increasing firepower? I know sometimes they can have the bullet-resistant-window-things, and that sometimes it's radio-controlled, but it seems kinda risky letting the loader expose himself
Idonno
less view, more expensive, not as quick in reacting as humans can be.cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
How about a camera on the gun? So it will be like a humvee.dayarath wrote:
.50 cal fired from these guns make quick work out of infantry in front and behind the tank. usefull for when the main gun is pointed at something else, sure there is a machinegun next to the main gun aswell, but this one points at exactly the same target as the main gun. The tank's turret can't rotate and aim at targets too quickly, so when you need some quick, good powerfull fire support; you get the machineguns on top. Also for protecting the tanks hiny, most vulnerable usually because the radars cant' sense shit behind them.Mek-Izzle wrote:
About Abrams tanks,
Why does the loader need a machine gun at the top? Is it just for the sake of increasing firepower? I know sometimes they can have the bullet-resistant-window-things, and that sometimes it's radio-controlled, but it seems kinda risky letting the loader expose himself
Idonno
inane little opines
Yes, especially considering Asians can't drive.k30dxedle wrote:
Should I wear a cheap imitation ACU everywhere after I start driving?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
Army uniforms get you out of tickets. Yes, they do.dayarath wrote:
you're gonna be late.
Every time, EVERY single time when you drive over the speed limit there's a cop in the bushes awaiting you to give you speed tickets.
On a side note: What's the top speed of a Bradley if it goes slower than an Abrams?
slowercowami wrote:
Yes, especially considering Asians can't drive.k30dxedle wrote:
Should I wear a cheap imitation ACU everywhere after I start driving?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
Army uniforms get you out of tickets. Yes, they do.
On a side note: What's the top speed of a Bradley if it goes slower than an Abrams?
41 for the Bradley, 45 (I think), for the Abrams.
Doesn't matter to me....GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
a brad could win an engagement. there is a reason why it has such a high silhouette. a curse considered by many but I, along with most, see it as a blessing.GR34 wrote:
Of course it has a tea and crumpet maker in it. But yea Warrior has no Tow on it thats were the Bradly wins But the BMP-3 wins also, Town missle,100mm main gun, 20mm Cannon and 7.62 PKT MG. Plus an MG on the back and one on each side its a battle ship on Treadssmartdude992 wrote:
the brit's one is for tea man, i saw that one on the history channel
People buying either one means more money coming into the UK. That's all I care about.
i like the look of it
and that it is so effective
and that it is so effective
So I was reading about the BMP-3, and that's one highly armed mother fucker. 100mm Main Gun that also fires ATGM'z, and a 30mm coaxial, and a 7.62mm coaxial ontop of that. And 2x7.62mm machine guns aswell.
Can even hold a fair amount of passengers
Not a bad piece of kit. Give it a tea-maker and all that digital shit that the U.S always put in, and you'll have a winner.
Can even hold a fair amount of passengers
Not a bad piece of kit. Give it a tea-maker and all that digital shit that the U.S always put in, and you'll have a winner.
did I miss something today?
why was this closed earlier today?