lowing
Banned
+1,662|6653|USA

RoosterCantrell wrote:

lowing wrote:

RoosterCantrell wrote:

No religeon is evil. A religeon it's texts, its structure, alone can harm NO ONE.  It's the people who wield it, and thier interpretations of it.

Lowing, you constantly say that you have Nothing against muslims, just the islamic religeon itself.  But, really, to me, that makes no sense.  The people are what make a religeon bad.

You have to acknowledge the fact that there are many, quite possibly the majority of muslims, that are peaceful good natured people, and its the fringe extremists, do extreme things that grab the headlines.    Stoning a person to death will create headlines, a charity drive, or the like doesn't get much attention.

You can offer up one thousand articles of horrible shit done in the name of Islam, and that is a large chunk of horrible things.  But if you were able to do the impossible, and take every single instance of good or bad something was done in the name of Islam, add them up; I think its pretty safe to say that the horrible things attributed to Islam would be shadowed by the overall good and well intentions of the Many followers of Islam.

TBH, I don't see your point in dragging this up over and over,  in the last thread, not many agreed with you, and you are unwilling to consider any opinion but  the one you currently have, it's just gonna be the same debate over and over.

I have considered everything you said, and I see some valid points, I just disagree with you, and everyone that does, according to you, has thier head in the sand.  Impossible to actually debate with someone like that.  You are unwilling to give an inch to anything anyone says.  Good luck with it anyway i guess .
I can give an inch as soon as what I say is responded to or disproved instead of being dismissed as racist, generalizing, Hitleresque, or any other number of bullshit responses that dances around what is actually posted.

In other words, prove to me that the teachings of Islam is NOT violent and intolerant then I will concede. Prove to me that the Prophet Muhammad was not violent and intolerant. and I will concede.
I see your point.  Muhammed may very well have been preaching violence and intolerance.  What we ARE trying to say, is that many Muslims do not follow that certain aspect of of his teachings.  So you shouldn't say that the Islamic faith is evil or intolerant.  Because a faith is what people make it, and most Muslims do not preach such things.  Just because the "founder" or what have you spoke of those things, anyone has the right to interpret it in thier own way, and many simply do not follow that aspect.

IF that means they are no longer following "true" islam then fine.  But they are still called muslims.  So, yes, what you are saying makes total sense, it's sick and twisted what many do in the name of Islam.  Totally true.  But There is so many more that do not adhere to those tachings who do believe in Islam.  Maybe if they had a different name for the muslims that are just good people, it would be easier to agree with you.

You keep getting told that you are generalizing.  It's just that you are, plain and simple.  There really is no debate in my opinion.

Like I said, I see your point.  Islam had its base in violence, barbarianism, chauvanism, and other things.  Some people still follow that to a T.  But you just can't say "there it is, that's how it started, Muhammed said it".  It's unfair.  Can't religeons evolve, change thier ideas and methods?  I think they can, I think they do.  Just because some of the followers refuse to evolve with it, doesn't mean you can blame the religeon.  Once again, it's not the religeon that causes harm, it's the people who wield the religeous idealogy.
If you do not follow the teachings of Christ you are not Christian............If you do not follow the teachings of Muhammad you are not Muslim.

Religions can evolve. The teachings of Christ are timeless, no evolution required. You follow it or you do not. Calling yourself Christian does not make it so. Same with Islam except those that are following this religion are doing so per the teachings therefore ARE Muslims. What people are doing that are not following the teachings of Muhammad is not PRACTICING Islam. So call it something else, and detach yourself from those that are practicing their faith which dictates the killing of all non-believers if they refuse to convert.


By the way I am not a Christian. I do recognize the difference between his teachings and words and those of his Islamic counterpart.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6653|USA

CameronPoe wrote:

lowing wrote:

Like I said before, our world is getting smaller and this religion is finding its way into our society more and more. I am not convinced that exploitation will not be taken advantage of.

I do not want a country who's city skylines are dottted with mosques and foot washing stations, or doctors covered up in burkas. I do not want special laws governing this group instead of the laws of the land....... etc.

Now please stop telling me I am paranoid and shit. I am not. Our landscape has already been affected by the Mexican invasion. Do not tell me that Islam can not or will attempt the same shit. They already have done it in Europe and if you don't give a shit, or you find it a refreshing change, that is fine. I do not want that change here. We are at war with the radical elements of this religion and they have support. With increased immigration, those elements and/or their support have an increased chance of finding their way into our country.

I tie the US and Saudi together because Islam is what is discussed and it is Islam that is growing throughout the world.
Here's a map of the world.

http://www.convertit.com/Global/World_T … _Small.JPG

Notice where Mexico is. Now notice where the middle east is. The US isn't in the least bit affected by 'the spread of Islam'. Over 95% of the US is Christian or secular. 96,000 Muslim immigrants became legal citizens of the US in 2006 out of a total of 1.27 million. That's only 7.6% of the total influx and 0.03% of the entire population of the US of which 0.6% in total were Muslims in 2001. A grand total of zero terrorist attacks perpetrated by US Muslim citizens have occurred in the last couple of centuries. The US public, due mainly to terrorism and the Mexican question, are pro 'closed borders' it seems to me and it should only be a matter of time before your government takes action. These cold hard facts thoroughly back up my claim that you are a paranoid Cold War nostalgist who misses a readily definable adversary on which to pin your problems and against which the US can propagate its global hegemony through its spread of 'democracy and freedom' (even if they don't want it or aren't ready for it).

PS You talk about Muslims not speaking out against these things. Why do you not speak out against the US Republican Party and the US Democrat Party and every US President since WWII for staunchly supporting, arming and aiding the Saudi regime? Shouldn't you be on a street corner somewhere with a placard? lol
Nope, the enemy of my enemy is my friend. .............. and they have oil.
sergeriver
Cowboy from Hell
+1,928|6759|Argentina

usmarine wrote:

sergeriver wrote:

Yawn!
I have looked at two threads so far, and these are your responses in both.  Very nice.
I prefer your "Lulz".
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6557

lowing wrote:

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/1039
Wow. Some Muslims wrote a letter. I wonder which bin that got thrown into.

Excerpt from your well researched story: "Jens Orback, the Swedish minister for Integration and Equality, however, categorically rejected the Muslim demands for separate laws."

You do love countering your own arguments don't you!!! lol

lowing wrote:

http://www.eursoc.com/news/fullstory.php/aid/1655/Malaysia_Edges_Towards_Islamic_Law.html
You mean the almost totally Muslim nation of Malaysia are edging towards Islamic law? How unexpected and strange? It better not seep across the entire length of the Asian continent over here to Europe....

To reiterate: Malaysia is in beside Thailand. OK?

lowing wrote:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/6190080.stm
"What they mustn't do - and this must never happen - is to stray into the field of criminal matters."
Gerald Butler QC

British Law > All Britain. The Jews and Muslims are playing pretend courts to make themselves feel important. Their decisions have no legal standing and cannot contravene secular British law in any way, shape or form. Keep stretching lowing.

lowing wrote:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=432075&in_page_id=1770&ico=Homepage&icl=TabModule&icc=NEWS&ct=5
Daily Mail (a.k.a Fox Britain) providing lowing with another article that doesn't show European institutions budging one iota for some demand made by a minority of a minority - not again! You seem to care a lot for our well-being lowing...

lowing wrote:

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/2927
Oh noes! A mufti (whatever that is) wants France to do something. He'd better not hold his breath for France to do anything!!! Another pointless article that fails to demonstrate erosion of European secularity. You need to try harder my old man.

lowing wrote:

^^^ hey it is your continent for all I give a shit all of your Irish babies can come out black haired and sporting beard for all I give a shit. I just don't want it here.
To reiterate: Malaysia is in South-east Asia.

lowing wrote:

The mexican invasion is a separate issue. It is also one that needs dealt with.
How's the placard coming along?
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6557

lowing wrote:

Nope, the enemy of my enemy is my friend. .............. and they have oil.
You are hypocritical, unprincipled and that comment indefinitely suspends all rights you ever had to criticise anyone else about turning a blind eye to anything ever again! That is unbelievable. How brazenly hypocritical. I can't believe you just typed those words....!!!!

https://www.bongonews.com/StoryImages/bush_saudi.jpg

Not to mention the fact that they are also the enemy of your friend Israel

Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-02-07 16:02:19)

lowing
Banned
+1,662|6653|USA

Pierre wrote:

lowing wrote:

I am worried about this, it is the same thing Islam is doing to all of us ( or trying to do) I do not like illegal immigration nor d oI like suicide bombings. What is your point?
WTF are you talking about? Is Islam invading the US? Did I miss anything? If I were you I would stop worrying about a hypothetical threat and start worrying about a real one. Get my point now?

lowing wrote:

As far as me " making Money in Iraq" I will say this.........I have always supported our troops and our efforts in Iraq. Long before I went there. The project I am proudly working on has been proven to us that it has saved American lives. I am getting paid to go over there and work on this project to improve our equipment. getting paid is exactly why I learned my trade. I am not a liberal, I know EARNING a living is grotesque to you, but I am a firm believer in EARNING A LIVING and not getting one handed to me or better yet ASSIGNED to by my socialist govt.
LOL. You're so predictable. Had to take the opportunity to take a cheap shot at what Europe - in your eyes - must be: a big collective handing out lots of money to all sorts pf people who are sitting on their ass. Good for you. FYI, I have to earn a living too, as the majority in Europe do. The only difference is that we take care of the ones who can't. In Europe, our society, through our governments, gives a helping hand, not the finger.

My point wasn't about you making money on the war - hell, I like you for being on this forum, so I would love to see some of those billions of dollars being spent on the war in Iraq going your way - my point was that you, as a US citizen and seemingly proud republican, don't worry about the fact that your republican government has been selling out your country for the last seven years while making a profit. Just one example: did you know your government gave the Taliban $ 43 million in 2001, months before 9/11? BUSH'S FAUSTIAN DEAL WITH THE TALIBAN.



Sweet dreams, Lowing, look out for 'the big bad wolf muslim' while your country gets sold.
I have no problem taking care of those that can not. As I say constantly but is conviently ignored when I get bombarded with racial and bigotry accusations I do not support taking care of those that WON'T work. I also did not say a word about Europe.....Guilty conscience I guess.

Well, holy shit Bush does not have a crystal ball and gave the taliban money to assist the starving farmers who no longer have an opium crop to sell. Yeah we are real assholes aren't we? Next time tell the whole truth.

Last edited by lowing (2008-02-07 16:03:05)

lowing
Banned
+1,662|6653|USA

CameronPoe wrote:

lowing wrote:

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/1039
Wow. Some Muslims wrote a letter. I wonder which bin that got thrown into.

Excerpt from your well researched story: "Jens Orback, the Swedish minister for Integration and Equality, however, categorically rejected the Muslim demands for separate laws."

You do love countering your own arguments don't you!!! lol

lowing wrote:

http://www.eursoc.com/news/fullstory.php/aid/1655/Malaysia_Edges_Towards_Islamic_Law.html
You mean the almost totally Muslim nation of Malaysia are edging towards Islamic law? How unexpected and strange? It better not seep across the entire length of the Asian continent over here to Europe....

To reiterate: Malaysia is in beside Thailand. OK?

lowing wrote:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/6190080.stm
"What they mustn't do - and this must never happen - is to stray into the field of criminal matters."
Gerald Butler QC

British Law > All Britain. The Jews and Muslims are playing pretend courts to make themselves feel important. Their decisions have no legal standing and cannot contravene secular British law in any way, shape or form. Keep stretching lowing.

lowing wrote:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=432075&in_page_id=1770&ico=Homepage&icl=TabModule&icc=NEWS&ct=5
Daily Mail (a.k.a Fox Britain) providing lowing with another article that doesn't show European institutions budging one iota for some demand made by a minority of a minority - not again! You seem to care a lot for our well-being lowing...

lowing wrote:

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/2927
Oh noes! A mufti (whatever that is) wants France to do something. He'd better not hold his breath for France to do anything!!! Another pointless article that fails to demonstrate erosion of European secularity. You need to try harder my old man.

lowing wrote:

^^^ hey it is your continent for all I give a shit all of your Irish babies can come out black haired and sporting beard for all I give a shit. I just don't want it here.
To reiterate: Malaysia is in South-east Asia.

lowing wrote:

The mexican invasion is a separate issue. It is also one that needs dealt with.
How's the placard coming along?
Wow more dismisals from Cam, you are saying no way, no how, and I am saying they are trying and one day will get the right people in office. If you do not think Islam is growing all over the world the nyou need to start googling. If you do not think Mosques are not rising all over the world then you need to start googling. If you think this immigration will not lead to greater radicalism then you are blind.

As far as your placard comment goes. It is not the individual I have ever spoken of Cam, it is the leaders of thie peaceful and tolerant religion that I am looking to hear from.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6653|USA

CameronPoe wrote:

lowing wrote:

Nope, the enemy of my enemy is my friend. .............. and they have oil.
You are hypocritical, unprincipled and that comment indefinitely suspends all rights you ever had to criticise anyone else about turning a blind eye to anything ever again! That is unbelievable. How brazenly hypocritical. I can't believe you just typed those words....!!!!

http://www.bongonews.com/StoryImages/bush_saudi.jpg

Not to mention the fact that they are also the enemy of your friend Israel
LOL, ya like that Cam,  I said that especially for you to get exactly the reaction I got. Thank you, I was not disappointed
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6557

lowing wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

lowing wrote:

Nope, the enemy of my enemy is my friend. .............. and they have oil.
You are hypocritical, unprincipled and that comment indefinitely suspends all rights you ever had to criticise anyone else about turning a blind eye to anything ever again! That is unbelievable. How brazenly hypocritical. I can't believe you just typed those words....!!!!

http://www.bongonews.com/StoryImages/bush_saudi.jpg

Not to mention the fact that they are also the enemy of your friend Israel
LOL, ya like that Cam,  I said that especially for you to get exactly the reaction I got. Thank you, I was not disappointed
What do you expect, it's been like talking to the Rain Man for the past couple of weeks.

"Yah, Islam bad, everyone else good. Yah."

"Islam, definitely bad, definitely bad, yah."

Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-02-07 16:14:33)

lowing
Banned
+1,662|6653|USA

CameronPoe wrote:

lowing wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:


You are hypocritical, unprincipled and that comment indefinitely suspends all rights you ever had to criticise anyone else about turning a blind eye to anything ever again! That is unbelievable. How brazenly hypocritical. I can't believe you just typed those words....!!!!

http://www.bongonews.com/StoryImages/bush_saudi.jpg

Not to mention the fact that they are also the enemy of your friend Israel
LOL, ya like that Cam,  I said that especially for you to get exactly the reaction I got. Thank you, I was not disappointed
What do you expect, it's been like talking to the Rain Man for the past couple of weeks.

"Yah, Islam bad, everyone else good. Yah."

"Islam, definitely bad, definitely bad, yah."
Then stop dismissing Islam as a inert force in society that does not or can not affect anyone or anything. Or worse yet, actually defend it.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6557

lowing wrote:

Wow more dismisals from Cam, you are saying no way, no how, and I am saying they are trying and one day will get the right people in office. If you do not think Islam is growing all over the world the nyou need to start googling. If you do not think Mosques are not rising all over the world then you need to start googling. If you think this immigration will not lead to greater radicalism then you are blind.

As far as your placard comment goes. It is not the individual I have ever spoken of Cam, it is the leaders of thie peaceful and tolerant religion that I am looking to hear from.
That's kind of improbable given the overwhelmingly secular/Christian nature of Europe as it stands, the cold hard constitutions that each constituent country has (which demand secularity) and the fact that we make our best attempt to practice proper immigration control, unlike some others I know of. Even if Muslim women had ten wombs each there wouldn't be a sniff of a threat to our political and legal systems. You are getting unbelievably "Cold War" on us lowing, chill the beans.

OK who is the leader of Islam? There isn't one. The post of Caliph was abolished centuries ago. Nobody speaks for any significant tranche of Muslims. Individual Imams preach to their individual communities, many of which in western and middle eastern countries do speak out and have spoken out. You just steadfastly refuse to listen to them.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-02-07 16:32:36)

lowing
Banned
+1,662|6653|USA

CameronPoe wrote:

lowing wrote:

Wow more dismisals from Cam, you are saying no way, no how, and I am saying they are trying and one day will get the right people in office. If you do not think Islam is growing all over the world the nyou need to start googling. If you do not think Mosques are not rising all over the world then you need to start googling. If you think this immigration will not lead to greater radicalism then you are blind.

As far as your placard comment goes. It is not the individual I have ever spoken of Cam, it is the leaders of thie peaceful and tolerant religion that I am looking to hear from.
That's kind of improbable given the overwhelmingly secular/Christian nature of Europe as it stands, the cold hard constitutions that each constituent country has (which demand secularity) and the fact that we make our best attempt to practice proper immigration control, unlike some others I know of. Even if Muslim women had ten wombs each there wouldn't be a sniff of a threat to our political and legal systems. You are getting unbelievably "Cold War" on us lowing, chill the beans.

OK who is the leader of Islam? There isn't one. The post of Caliph was abolished centuries ago. Nobody speaks for any significant tranche of Muslims. Individual Imams preach to their individual communities, many of which in western and middle eastern countries do speak out and have spoken out. You just steadfastly refuse to listen to them.

Actually I miss the cold war..........The US babysat this hemosphere and the Soviet Union babysat the other.Ahhhhhhh  The good ole' days.

Sorry Cam, 1 guy don't count remember? It is hereby dismissed as insignificant and folly
PureFodder
Member
+225|6287

lowing wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

lowing wrote:

Wow more dismisals from Cam, you are saying no way, no how, and I am saying they are trying and one day will get the right people in office. If you do not think Islam is growing all over the world the nyou need to start googling. If you do not think Mosques are not rising all over the world then you need to start googling. If you think this immigration will not lead to greater radicalism then you are blind.

As far as your placard comment goes. It is not the individual I have ever spoken of Cam, it is the leaders of thie peaceful and tolerant religion that I am looking to hear from.
That's kind of improbable given the overwhelmingly secular/Christian nature of Europe as it stands, the cold hard constitutions that each constituent country has (which demand secularity) and the fact that we make our best attempt to practice proper immigration control, unlike some others I know of. Even if Muslim women had ten wombs each there wouldn't be a sniff of a threat to our political and legal systems. You are getting unbelievably "Cold War" on us lowing, chill the beans.

OK who is the leader of Islam? There isn't one. The post of Caliph was abolished centuries ago. Nobody speaks for any significant tranche of Muslims. Individual Imams preach to their individual communities, many of which in western and middle eastern countries do speak out and have spoken out. You just steadfastly refuse to listen to them.

Actually I miss the cold war..........The US babysat this hemosphere and the Soviet Union babysat the other.Ahhhhhhh  The good ole' days.

Sorry Cam, 1 guy don't count remember? It is hereby dismissed as insignificant and folly
Ah, the cold war, the days when we were commiting all the terrorism, before we started getting some of it back.
AAFCptKabbom
Member
+127|6660|WPB, FL. USA
You got my respect Lowing for standing your ground on the facts and harsh reality of what is truly happening in the world.  Some find it easy to spew massive amounts of emotional opinions or worse yet they search for quotes that they use to support their own ignorance.  Here's one for those types...  "It is a good thing for an uneducated man to read books of quotations." [Winston Churchill].

I really think that Cam and his crack research team are well versed in distortion and distraction when they find a topic they don't emotionally agree with.

Why is it expected that we leave violent actions and words of future violent actions unchallenged?  We get blamed for taking action and get blamed for not taking action - then when we take action that needs to be taken we get second guessed - make up your minds. 

Here's a quote for your consistent message Lowing or should it be a motto - "One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger. But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will reduce the danger by half. Never run away from anything. Never!"  [Winston Churchill].
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6653|USA

PureFodder wrote:

lowing wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:


That's kind of improbable given the overwhelmingly secular/Christian nature of Europe as it stands, the cold hard constitutions that each constituent country has (which demand secularity) and the fact that we make our best attempt to practice proper immigration control, unlike some others I know of. Even if Muslim women had ten wombs each there wouldn't be a sniff of a threat to our political and legal systems. You are getting unbelievably "Cold War" on us lowing, chill the beans.

OK who is the leader of Islam? There isn't one. The post of Caliph was abolished centuries ago. Nobody speaks for any significant tranche of Muslims. Individual Imams preach to their individual communities, many of which in western and middle eastern countries do speak out and have spoken out. You just steadfastly refuse to listen to them.

Actually I miss the cold war..........The US babysat this hemosphere and the Soviet Union babysat the other.Ahhhhhhh  The good ole' days.

Sorry Cam, 1 guy don't count remember? It is hereby dismissed as insignificant and folly
Ah, the cold war, the days when we were commiting all the terrorism, before we started getting some of it back.
I am sorry, can you give me a year where the west never experienced terrorism??
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6557

AAFCptKabbom wrote:

You got my respect Lowing for standing your ground on the facts and harsh reality of what is truly happening in the world.  Some find it easy to spew massive amounts of emotional opinions or worse yet they search for quotes that they use to support their own ignorance.  Here's one for those types...  "It is a good thing for an uneducated man to read books of quotations." [Winston Churchill].

I really think that Cam and his crack research team are well versed in distortion and distraction when they find a topic they don't emotionally agree with.

Why is it expected that we leave violent actions and words of future violent actions unchallenged?  We get blamed for taking action and get blamed for not taking action - then when we take action that needs to be taken we get second guessed - make up your minds. 

Here's a quote for your consistent message Lowing or should it be a motto - "One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger. But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will reduce the danger by half. Never run away from anything. Never!"  [Winston Churchill].
Kind of ironic that you're backing up the arguments of a man who is just doing random google searches for incidents where an unspecified number of Muslims send letters to branches of government only to have their letter laughed at. It is also ironic and quite frankly hilarious that you quote Winston Churchill's quote about how "uneducated man" resorts to the "quotations" of others. lol. You might find on further reading that it is you who are the emotive one, we here in the real world are actually looking at hard statistics, personal experience and various other facts. You can go back to sleep now.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-02-08 00:47:06)

Catbox
forgiveness
+505|6718

CameronPoe wrote:

AAFCptKabbom wrote:

You got my respect Lowing for standing your ground on the facts and harsh reality of what is truly happening in the world.  Some find it easy to spew massive amounts of emotional opinions or worse yet they search for quotes that they use to support their own ignorance.  Here's one for those types...  "It is a good thing for an uneducated man to read books of quotations." [Winston Churchill].

I really think that Cam and his crack research team are well versed in distortion and distraction when they find a topic they don't emotionally agree with.

Why is it expected that we leave violent actions and words of future violent actions unchallenged?  We get blamed for taking action and get blamed for not taking action - then when we take action that needs to be taken we get second guessed - make up your minds. 

Here's a quote for your consistent message Lowing or should it be a motto - "One ought never to turn one's back on a threatened danger and try to run away from it. If you do that, you will double the danger. But if you meet it promptly and without flinching, you will reduce the danger by half. Never run away from anything. Never!"  [Winston Churchill].
Kind of ironic that you're backing up the arguments of a man who is just doing random google searches for incidents where an unspecified number of Muslims send letters to branches of government only to have their letter laughed at. It is also ironic and quite frankly hilarious that you quote Winston Churchill's quote about how "uneducated man" resorts to the "quotations" of others. lol. You might find on further reading that it is you who are the emotive one, we here in the real world are actually looking at hard statistics, personal experience and various other facts. You can go back to sleep now.
what are you going to do when they move in to Ireland... ?
Love is the answer
Catbox
forgiveness
+505|6718
keep wishing it away...
Love is the answer
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6557

[TUF]Catbox wrote:

what are you going to do when they move in to Ireland... ?
I have a couple of Muslim colleagues where I work. They fit in very well. One is from Pakistan, one is from UAE. The guy from Pakistan is a quiet, mild-mannered man in IT. The guy from the UAE, who works in Settlement & Trading, is fairly moderate - e.g. he drinks alcohol (hard not to if you want to fit in in Ireland) - and is very much a proper Irish person at this stage. He has cousins in Baghdad and to put it mildly is not exactly 'pro-US'.

In Ireland we have something called immigration control. You may have heard of it. It happens in most countries. When someone arrives illegally in the country we ship them back out again. You should try it. As for the existing Muslim populations impact on Ireland? Precisely none.

You seem to be as paranoid as lowing. Look at a map and relax.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-02-08 01:24:58)

PureFodder
Member
+225|6287

lowing wrote:

PureFodder wrote:

lowing wrote:


Actually I miss the cold war..........The US babysat this hemosphere and the Soviet Union babysat the other.Ahhhhhhh  The good ole' days.

Sorry Cam, 1 guy don't count remember? It is hereby dismissed as insignificant and folly
Ah, the cold war, the days when we were commiting all the terrorism, before we started getting some of it back.
I am sorry, can you give me a year where the west never experienced terrorism??
Can you give me a year when we never comitted terrorism?
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|6763

PureFodder wrote:

Can you give me a year when we never comitted terrorism?
Name the last American to blow himself in a starbucks or a nightclub in the name of God?

Go ahead...I'll wait.
Catbox
forgiveness
+505|6718
the biggest enemy of moderate muslims are the radical islamists... I hope and pray that the moderates win...  My ancestor Daniel O'Connell  would have fought to keep Ireland free of people like this... you're a smart dude... you must see this troubling influence...?
Love is the answer
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6557

[TUF]Catbox wrote:

the biggest enemy of moderate muslims are the radical islamists... I hope and pray that the moderates win...  My ancestor Daniel O'Connell  would have fought to keep Ireland free of people like this... you're a smart dude... you must see this troubling influence...?
In Ireland the kind of things you speak are just not happening. The number of muslims in every nation in Europe outside the big 3 (UK, France and Germany) is tiny. The big 3 have more sizeable (but still small) populations are because their colonialism in the past meant that people in their colonies were entitled to easier citizenship, which no longer applies. We are protected by immigration control, the nigh on unchangeable provisions of our firm constitutions and the fact that those Muslims that do immigrate legally are generally fine upstanding people with skills we need and who are more interested in making a buck than blowing up a starbucks.

Daniel O'Connell would not endorse discriminating against a minority on tenuous grounds.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-02-08 01:29:28)

PureFodder
Member
+225|6287

usmarine wrote:

PureFodder wrote:

Can you give me a year when we never comitted terrorism?
Name the last American to blow himself in a starbucks or a nightclub in the name of God?

Go ahead...I'll wait.
Westerners don't need to blow themselves up, economic sanctons, blockades, training funding and supporting local death squads, bombing places using aircraft and missiles are all much more effective forms of terrorism and have killed simply vastly more people than suicide bombing. If radical Muslims had access to cruise missiles you can be fairly sure they'd use them instead.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard