BF2S Forums Look Out Great Britain, Your Appeasement Is Showing!!

lowing wrote:

B.Schuss wrote:

lowing wrote:

...As far as the rest of your BS, we will agree to disagree, as usual please take note though, in all of your ramblings,  you will not find anywhere that I endorse "killing all of the Muslims". I say, Islam is intolerant and violent, Radical ISlam is bigger than you let on and has a vast network of support, and Islam does not mesh with western society, ALL FACT!! Basically, you are a fuckin' drama queen.

well, let me ask you this then, lowing.
With all you have said here, and what was discussed over those 32 pages, what exactly are you advocating, endorsing or suggesting we do about this threat that radical islam supposedly presents to us ?

Good question, first I guess I would have to insist that all nations drop the denial about radical Islam. If you are still saying "supposedly" in your questions about radical Islamic threats, then there is not much that can be done. Not until you at least acknowledge radical Islam is a real threat.


After you stop worrying about hurt feelings and pull your heads out of the sand or your asses I would say exposing the money trail that feeds terrorist networks and stopping it at its source. No country shall give safe harbor to terrorists or their money. Those that do will be forced to answer for it.

that's all ? I believe cutting off the money support and detecting and destroying cells of radical islamists is something that we are doing already.

What should we do about the millions of law-abiding Muslims who live peacefully all over Europe, for example ? A lot of those ( if not the majority ) have EU citizenship, too.

Wouldn't you agree that we should try to live together with muslims peacefully ? After all, the majority does not commit crimes, or engages in terrorist activities.
Or are you suggesting that we wipe islam off the face of the earth altogether ? would that be your ultimate "solution" ?

FatherTed wrote:

B.Schuss wrote:

... are you suggesting that we wipe islam off the face of the earth altogether ? would that be your ultimate "solution" ?

Sounds a lot like "Final Solution" to me.

honestly, I was thinking about writing "final solution", but that would have been offensive towards lowing. I am pretty sure that he doesn't plan to kill every single muslim on the face of the earth. At least I would hope he doesn't.

But he takes a very aggressive stand against islam, and because of that, I want to know what - according to his opinion - the ultimate solution for the problem he believes in so passionately should be. I mean, if he does not believe that christians and muslims can co-exist peacefully, what would be the logical alternative ?

B.Schuss wrote:

FatherTed wrote:

B.Schuss wrote:

... are you suggesting that we wipe islam off the face of the earth altogether ? would that be your ultimate "solution" ?

Sounds a lot like "Final Solution" to me.

honestly, I was thinking about writing "final solution", but that would have been offensive towards lowing. I am pretty sure that he doesn't plan to kill every single muslim on the face of the earth. At least I would hope he doesn't.

But he takes a very aggressive stand against islam, and because of that, I want to know what - according to his opinion - the ultimate solution for the problem he believes in so passionately should be. I mean, if he does not believe that christians and muslims can co-exist peacefully, what would be the logical alternative ?

The question is not whether we can co-exist with Islam, the question really is, is Islam willing to co-exist with non-Muslims. I am not speaking on an individual basis I am talking about the growing instability in the world regarding Islam itself. Muslims have been killing each other for hundreds of years and now, do to our ever shrinking world, that religious violence has found its way to the west. 

If the worlds nations were really really locking down the money trail, then the terrorists wouldn't have the money to finance their operations now. So you might think the world is shutting down the money trail but reality says it is not.

Dilbert_X wrote:

lowing wrote:

No country shall give safe harbor to terrorists or their money. Those that do will be forced to answer for it.

Do you mean like America and the IRA?

Wasn't the government. It was individuals and private organizations. And, as many of our Irish friends like to point out, there was a non-terrorist faction of the IRA.

Dilbert_X wrote:

lowing wrote:

No country shall give safe harbor to terrorists or their money. Those that do will be forced to answer for it.

Do you mean like America and the IRA?

I am sorry, which terrorist organization is funded by the USA?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jh … fit103.xml


Keep going GB yer on a role!!!!!

lowing wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

lowing wrote:

No country shall give safe harbor to terrorists or their money. Those that do will be forced to answer for it.

Do you mean like America and the IRA?

I am sorry, which terrorist organization is funded by the USA?

CIA and KLA

Last edited by blademaster (2008-02-04 18:51:38)

http://www.spiegel.de/international/ger … 23,00.html

and for our German friends.....look out the Muslims are pissed off at the nerve you have of defending yourself.....We all know what can happen when Muslims get pissed off so be prepared to start kissing ass.

lowing wrote:

http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/0302_terror.shtml

doin great keep it up, GB...

Edit button, please. Absolutely no point triple-posting like this.

@last post: It's kinda hard to tell, because presumably the organizations supported wouldn't be called 'terrorists' even though they do similar things.