Ya, I read the books too, and there really isn't a comparison between the movies and books, like what the heck, where is the Jackal in the movies? That probably would have been better than making basically the first Bourne book into three movies.CapnNismo wrote:
To be honest, I may have to disagree with you. But only on the contention point that the books and the films are so different you cannot really compare the two. The only thing the two share are the character names and the general premise that in the first installment, Bourne works for the CIA and loses his memory. From there on, they go an entirely different path in character background and development. Not just Bourne, but all the characters. I still have to read the last book. It's on my shelf ... but I got distracted because of a new Legacy of the Force book among others.The Sheriff wrote:
Great books tbqfh, The Bourne series of books are better than the films aswell.
And Harry Potter is good reading. You can understand why they freaking sold like hot cakes*
*I have never actually seen hotcakes being sold rapidly, and use this expression merely as an idiom.