What would you do?
Serious replies only, kthnx.
Serious replies only, kthnx.
Middle East.
No Joke.
No Joke.
Probably do nothing with it. Why would I want to nuke anyone?
So, you'd fire it at the middle east? Assume it has 6 MIRVs. What targets would you choose?Airwolf wrote:
Middle East.
No Joke.
sell it to the US government
I would use it to make Belgium finally get a government the people actually voted for
mmmm i would lie and say i have 1 thousand and say im going to let one off every hour unless my demands are met, would ask for 100million then mmm prove i had it then mmm sell it to the taliban for protection hahaha my plan will work see you on CNN
nothing
So, you would dismantle it?SenorToenails wrote:
Probably do nothing with it. Why would I want to nuke anyone?
i would keep it and threaten the world saying play fair or i bomb you!
I love the ad on this thread. Lol. (The gov't fraud one)
Last edited by fermatx (2008-01-21 08:36:25)
If I had a nuclear missile, I would not want to keep it around. So yes, I would dismantle it.fermatx wrote:
So, you would dismantle it?SenorToenails wrote:
Probably do nothing with it. Why would I want to nuke anyone?
Nuclear weapons are not something that should be in the hands of one man.
That's a hard one. However assuming all armed forces pulled out...fermatx wrote:
So, you'd fire it at the middle east? Assume it has 6 MIRVs. What targets would you choose?Airwolf wrote:
Middle East.
No Joke.
Somewhere roundabout here
Last edited by Airwolf (2008-01-21 08:41:30)
mecca
The middle east becomes glass
Austria - those fuckers are going down ...
once upon a midnight dreary, while i pron surfed, weak and weary, over many a strange and spurious site of ' hot xxx galore'. While i clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning, and my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour, " 'Tis not possible!", i muttered, " give me back my free hardcore!"..... quoth the server, 404.
If I had one already I could get more I'm guessing.
I'd wait until the next real war, then fire them at the enemy I suppose. Then my government could say I was acting alone and they don't condone a Nuclear war. So that's 2-3 Nuke hits without retaliation.
England prevails.
I'd wait until the next real war, then fire them at the enemy I suppose. Then my government could say I was acting alone and they don't condone a Nuclear war. So that's 2-3 Nuke hits without retaliation.
England prevails.
right on tehran.Aapje wrote:
Iran..
inane little opines
Sell it, of course.
Looking at above replies, however, I'd nuke whoever nukes Iran. That's right, bitches.
(Oh crap it was two dutchies... looks like I had better emigrate first )
Looking at above replies, however, I'd nuke whoever nukes Iran. That's right, bitches.
(Oh crap it was two dutchies... looks like I had better emigrate first )
"If you want a vision of the future, imagine SecuROM slapping your face with its dick -- forever." -George Orwell
fixed
(sorry Canada if you get harmed)
Africa
Get rid of Aids
Get rid of Aids
exactly my thoughts, but I wouldn't sell it to some terrorist.LaidBackNinja wrote:
Sell it, of course.
Whatever I damn well please with it, because once you have one, you just nobody will do a damn thing about it.
nuke the grammy awards
Not Kansas!Kurazoo wrote:
fixed
http://img206.imageshack.us/img206/7442 … ap2hk6.png
(sorry Canada if you get harmed)
