I am pointing out that the thread title is not just misleading, but wrong. Also, that it seems most people in this thread did not even read the article USM so nicely posted before starting with their disdain.David.P wrote:
Ken why are you defending him?KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Read the article. He didn't give any aid. He was hired as a consultant to lobby the U.S. government. He is tied to the organization and lawsuit only in that he helped launder money then lied about it in legal depositions.Spark wrote:
I think it counts as treason in this case.
Money laundering and perjury does not equal treason.
How am I defending him? If you read my posts and can comprehend them, I would hope you could come to that conclusion yourself.
Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2008-01-16 19:39:24)