any good lawyer would rip that to shredsUzique wrote:
I'm a law undergraduate, so here's your officially-correct answer : P.jord wrote:
If you start having consensual sex and then She wants stop but you carry on?
Not for me, for my friend...
In the UK, sexual intercourse in rape is treated as a 'continuing act', so that there can be liability for what might have appeared to be an omission (legal term for 'failure to act'). As decided by the doctrine of judicial precedence (earlier cases make the law for all later examples), the Privy Council has ruled previously that if a victim consented to penetration, but after penetrated they ceased to give their consent (in other words, the victim wanted to stop), a man would be committing rape if he did not comply and withdraw.
Summary: A definite 'yes', if it can be proven of course!
It's rape. No deduction on the sentence. It's rape.
They always say stop when you hit the poop shoot
Looks like "your friend" is a rapist. Congrats on having sex though.
Last edited by LaidBackNinja (2008-01-18 09:48:43)
"If you want a vision of the future, imagine SecuROM slapping your face with its dick -- forever." -George Orwell
It's rape if she says to stop & you don't, hard to prove if you've been together more than once.
Thanks I'll tell him you congratulated him...LaidBackNinja wrote:
Looks like "your friend" is a rapist. Congrats on having sex though.
Any law can be 'ripped to shreds' in a court-room environment, where the adversarial process basically boils down to a battle of witness presentation, clever theatrical dramatics and jury swaying. Besides, lawyers are nothing but egos with an agenda, dressed up in official suits. No law is 'concrete' either-- if a case arises where that precedence will create an absurd result, then our 'Supreme Court' will effectively denounce or digress from the first ruling.Marlboroman82 wrote:
any good lawyer would rip that to shredsUzique wrote:
I'm a law undergraduate, so here's your officially-correct answer : P.jord wrote:
If you start having consensual sex and then She wants stop but you carry on?
Not for me, for my friend...
In the UK, sexual intercourse in rape is treated as a 'continuing act', so that there can be liability for what might have appeared to be an omission (legal term for 'failure to act'). As decided by the doctrine of judicial precedence (earlier cases make the law for all later examples), the Privy Council has ruled previously that if a victim consented to penetration, but after penetrated they ceased to give their consent (in other words, the victim wanted to stop), a man would be committing rape if he did not comply and withdraw.
Summary: A definite 'yes', if it can be proven of course!
(If I've misinterpreted your post, and you were talking about my explanation of consent & rape, then I do apologize for not trying a little harder to utterly baffle the OP with long esoteric Latin terminologies and references to obscure statutes and cases. Wasn't aware I had to post to impress around here.)
Thanks for the great insight though!
Last edited by Uzique (2008-01-18 09:59:57)
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Of course its rape....
But then again only 5% of rape accusations actualy end in a conviction.
But then again only 5% of rape accusations actualy end in a conviction.
GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
yes.
Why did I laugh at the "Predict the name of your lover now!" ad when the topic is about rape?
I guess the same could be said about real rape.jord wrote:
But could you not just say you thought it was role-play or you couldn't hear her?Lieutenant_Jensen wrote:
I would say yes..
If the other part want's to stop, but you cary in, then if you get in court they would probably say it's rape..
+1, and, also, is that really your X fire?The Sheriff wrote:
Wear earphones, problem solved.
Anyways, i think it is.
I prefer to call it "surprise sex".liquidat0r wrote:
I guess the same could be said about real rape.jord wrote:
But could you not just say you thought it was role-play or you couldn't hear her?Lieutenant_Jensen wrote:
I would say yes..
If the other part want's to stop, but you cary in, then if you get in court they would probably say it's rape..
"If you want a vision of the future, imagine SecuROM slapping your face with its dick -- forever." -George Orwell
L.Ruckel wrote:
not if they cant find her...
M.
A.
O.
15 more years! 15 more years!
Main argument is that she already agreed to it. So it applies more to the "Carrying on rape" as opposed to "Real rape".liquidat0r wrote:
I guess the same could be said about real rape.jord wrote:
But could you not just say you thought it was role-play or you couldn't hear her?Lieutenant_Jensen wrote:
I would say yes..
If the other part want's to stop, but you cary in, then if you get in court they would probably say it's rape..
Yes Jord, it doesn't seem as severe as 'real rape' (as in, rape from the word "GO!")- but it is fundamentally the exact same act you're committing. Sex is legal when both parties are consensual (and over the minimum age, of course ). The minute that breaks down or fails, then someone is in the wrong. I'd tell your friend not to worry though... most rape cases never get into court in the first-place (25% of all complainants withdraw their complaint)- and less than 10% of all cases actually make it through to a proper conviction anyway. Proving that she 'changed her mind' halfway through the act would be incredibly hard to prove, unless there was some highly-incriminating physical evidence to suggest so (e.g. bruises, damage etc.)
Last edited by Uzique (2008-01-18 10:09:04)
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
why would you want to keep going when she says no? that would just make me feel weird and dirty and bad.
1. This needs to be in D&ST
2. Likely rape in the eyes of the law, though a bit unfair for the woman to say no once things have begun.
2. Likely rape in the eyes of the law, though a bit unfair for the woman to say no once things have begun.
blue ballsGunSlinger OIF II wrote:
why would you want to keep going when she says no? that would just make me feel weird and dirty and bad.
I don't know, maybe it was too good to end that soon?GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
why would you want to keep going when she says no? that would just make me feel weird and dirty and bad.
You gotta agree though, rape porn is one of the better categories...
palmela handerson could fix that, better than feeling like a rapist.
Last edited by GunSlinger OIF II (2008-01-18 10:14:54)
I don't have the confidence to make a thread in D+ST yet. Would do I look like, someone who's been here for 800 days+?Stingray24 wrote:
1. This needs to be in D&ST
2. Likely rape in the eyes of the law, though a bit unfair for the woman to say no once things have begun.
Haven't purchased a flamesuit yet?
I got one off the market for cheap. It only protects against idiotic general chatter insults. I don't think it could stand a full blown intelligent argument.
but then you'd get bitched out for sneaking itno the bathroom and jerking off.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
palmela handerson could fix that, better than feeling like a rapist.