apollo_fi wrote:
Zimmer wrote:
Really?
123Why would I say such things without back up? I wouldn't.
And yes Jens, articulation is oral. My response didn't lack content because I thought you would have been smart enough to go search it on Google. It seems I was completely wrong.
From
1: 'But there are certainly cases where cell phones pose a definite threat, and that’s been tested and documented.'
From
2: 'Therefore, FDA recommends that clinicians and other device users ... consider preventing known sources of interference (e.g., cellular phones, hand-held transceivers) from coming too close to patient monitors and other sensitive electronic medical devices.'
3 misquotes its source.
It's not enough just to Google it, friend. Some reading comprehension is required, too.
They "posed" threats. Past tense. A long time ago, when phones were analogue, they really did pose threats. But the recent discussions about it showed that interference DID happen, but not to a dangerous enough scale. It only affected the machine slightly when the phone was in 3 feet of it.
Here is the original article. It is quite interesting. I did read those articles, and your quotes don't prove or misprove my point. "Too close to the medical devices". Exactly. I never suggested using a mobile phone in close proximity to one while there is a patient there. A. It would be rude. B. That could happen. I know all that. But mobile phones are NOT dangerous in a hopsital. Lets get some things straight, if I use my mobile phone outside the operating theater or in the hallway, I will pose NO threat to anyone.
http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.com/in … 7&UID=Now do you understand why I was posting that content? It was because I have no intentions of going into a patients room and phoning someone. Who would?