The Dolphins had a 1-15 season. They almost went winless, but clipped the Baltimore Ravens by a touchdown in Overtime in Week 15. Are they the worst team in the NFL History and can Bill Parcells turn this team around like he did with the Cowboys? Discuss.
Poll
Are the 2007 Miami Dolphins the worst team in NFL history?
| Yes | 40% | 40% - 31 | ||||
| No | 25% | 25% - 19 | ||||
| I don't watch football | 34% | 34% - 26 | ||||
| Total: 76 | ||||||
Can't be worse than Stockport County.
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Worst? Maybe.
Can Bill Parcells turn them around? Possibly. He's definately a miracle worker.
Can Bill Parcells turn them around? Possibly. He's definately a miracle worker.
FixedFatherTed wrote:
Can't be worse than Leeds United.
Who the feck are Stockport County, for Ted's sake use real teams
Leeds are doing pretty well tbh, if they hadn't have had points taken away at the start, they'd be kicking total arse.Mek-Izzle wrote:
FixedFatherTed wrote:
Can't be worse than Leeds United.
Who the feck are Stockport County, for Ted's sake use real teams
and just fucking google it dikhead
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
no. falcons were hardly better this season. along w/ the rams.
No. The 1976 Tampa Bay Yuccaneers are the worst team in NFL history. They didn't win a game and they looked very bad doing it. The Cowboys went 1-15 in 1989 but they aren't considered the worst team in history so I can't see how the Dolphins should be considered that given they were in the majority of the games they lost.
Accrinton Stanley are far worse.Mek-Izzle wrote:
FixedFatherTed wrote:
Can't be worse than Leeds United.
Who the feck are Stockport County, for Ted's sake use real teams
It doesn't even matter that Miami finished last. They don't get relagated or punished, infact don't they get rewarded by getting first picks on that draft shizzle you guys do.
the bucs were a brand new team then so its believable that they sucked then but the dolphins have a team that should win they just suck with good players.
i would'nt know. ive never been able to get into Baseball.
'76 Bucs, 'nuff said.
good points, but Miami had a solid team that was projected to do well (especially the defense with thomas and taylor). 1976 Bucs were a new team, so they had an excuse. the 1989 cowboys were also a new team with troy aikman's nfl premier and jimmy Johnson's arrival.killer21 wrote:
No. The 1976 Tampa Bay Yuccaneers are the worst team in NFL history. They didn't win a game and they looked very bad doing it. The Cowboys went 1-15 in 1989 but they aren't considered the worst team in history so I can't see how the Dolphins should be considered that given they were in the majority of the games they lost.
They were brand new, though.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
'76 Bucs, 'nuff said.
I only wish the Dolphins would be the anti-New England and be 0-16. A losing record of 0-16 is just as hard to "achieve" as winning 16-0. It would be in the NFL history books as a first: two teams in the same division with records of 16-0 & 0-16.
thomas got injured early in the season and didnt play.Yellowman03 wrote:
good points, but Miami had a solid team that was projected to do well (especially the defense with thomas and taylor). 1976 Bucs were a new team, so they had an excuse. the 1989 cowboys were also a new team with troy aikman's nfl premier and jimmy Johnson's arrival.killer21 wrote:
No. The 1976 Tampa Bay Yuccaneers are the worst team in NFL history. They didn't win a game and they looked very bad doing it. The Cowboys went 1-15 in 1989 but they aren't considered the worst team in history so I can't see how the Dolphins should be considered that given they were in the majority of the games they lost.
Does being a brand-new team automatically disqualify you from being the worst? I don't think so.Spearhead wrote:
They were brand new, though.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
'76 Bucs, 'nuff said.
I hope for ur sake ur kiddingdave_the_rave23 wrote:
i would'nt know. ive never been able to get into Baseball.
Not living up to preseason hype != a bad team.Yellowman03 wrote:
good points, but Miami had a solid team that was projected to do well (especially the defense with thomas and taylor). 1976 Bucs were a new team, so they had an excuse. the 1989 cowboys were also a new team with troy aikman's nfl premier and jimmy Johnson's arrival.killer21 wrote:
No. The 1976 Tampa Bay Yuccaneers are the worst team in NFL history. They didn't win a game and they looked very bad doing it. The Cowboys went 1-15 in 1989 but they aren't considered the worst team in history so I can't see how the Dolphins should be considered that given they were in the majority of the games they lost.
The Dolphins certainly are not the worst team in the NFL. I think six of their games were within three points? Yeah, it was six. So, while their ability to close and execute at the end is absolutely lacking, they were in many games.
LSgtSlauther wrote:
I hope for ur sake ur kiddingdave_the_rave23 wrote:
i would'nt know. ive never been able to get into Baseball.
O
L
What's so funny?cowami wrote:
LSgtSlauther wrote:
I hope for ur sake ur kiddingdave_the_rave23 wrote:
i would'nt know. ive never been able to get into Baseball.
O
L
u serial right now?Ryan wrote:
What's so funny?cowami wrote:
LSgtSlauther wrote:
I hope for ur sake ur kidding
O
L
No, I'm joking.SgtSlauther wrote:
u serial right now?Ryan wrote:
What's so funny?cowami wrote:
L
O
L
Ryan wrote:
No, I'm joking.SgtSlauther wrote:
u serial right now?Ryan wrote:
What's so funny?
SgtSlauther wrote:
Ryan wrote:
No, I'm joking.SgtSlauther wrote:
u serial right now?